Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword Review by Solver

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Taking over the world, one franchise at a time

  • Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword Review by Solver

    Taking over the world, one franchise at a time

    BtS Corporation Pros: Add an extra layer of strategy and some peaceful stuff to do in the Industrial Age. Corporations can spawn numerous strategies.

    BtS Corporation Cons: Overall, favour warmongers more than builders. Make the balance of State Property questionable.

    BtS Corporation Tips: Set your sights on corporations early. You should know if you want to found one well before you get the chance. You may want to save a GP from earlier to found a corporation.

    Corporations are another major addition to Beyond the Sword. As it has been mentioned many times, you can think of them as late-game religions. There are seven of those, each is an investment to found and provides benefits. As you probably know, corporations provide benefits in exchange for resources. For every city in the world that has the corporation, its headquarters gains 4 gold. The other benefits depend on the corporation.

    Corporations are founded with Great People. To do so, you need the Corporation technology, another technology specific to the particular corporation and a Great Person of the relevant type. For example, to found Sid’s Sushi, you’ll need Corporation, Medicine and a Great Merchant. In addition, to found a corporation, you must have at least one source of any of the resources consumed by the corporation (so for Sushi, that’d be Fish, Clams, Rice or Crabs).

    The best thing about corporations is that they have an excellent tradeoff mechanism. All corporations provide good benefits that would always be nice to have. Other than the challenge of founding a corporation (and if you want to found the right corporation at the right time, it is quite a challenge indeed), there is the aspect of maintenance costs. When a corporation expands to a city, the city’s maintenance costs go up – it’s a considerable increase, too. At Headquarters, you get 4 gold when it expands to a new city, and assuming you have a Market, a Grocer, a Bank and the Wall Street in your HQ city (and you should!), that’s 16 gold. This will usually let you break even with the increased maintenance costs, but that won’t always be the case, either. At any rate, expanding a corporation (which is done via Executive units) also costs a lump sum of gold in the first place, so expanding corporations will drain your treasury – at least at first, they may start paying for themselves some time later.

    The benefits of corporations are really nice, though. Extra food? Yummy! Extra hammers? Prepare the war machine! Extra science? Onwards to the final frontier! Extra gold? Buy some oil grease for our Tanks!

    Really, corporation benefits are quite good. They do, of course, scale with the size of your empire – the more resources you have, the more you gain. Therefore, corporations aren’t good if you happen to have a small empire with huge cities and a specialist economy, but if you’re an extensive civilization, corporations are good. Also, note that corporation maintenance and benefits scale with map size, which is required to make them balanced across all maps.

    Corporations offer many possibilities for strategic variations, and this is one area where I am really looking forward to see what the community can come up with. Personally, I love boosting a specialist economy with either food-producing corporation. If you can get the corporation to provide you +6 food, that is 3 free specialists! You can just use these corporations to boost your city growth, of course – probably the best thing you can do with those tundra cities that otherwise get stuck at size 6 for the entire game.

    Further enhancing the dynamics of corporation, their maintenance scales with the amount of relevant resources you have. So if you have Mining Inc., the more metals you have, the higher your maintenance costs will be. This is done to prevent a "breaking point" where having X resources would give benefits so huge that maintenance becomes irrelevant. Also, you can now trade for resources you already have, so you can try and buy extra resources for your corporations to consume. It plays well with scaling maintenance, because such trades will increase the effectiveness of your corporations, while also upping maintenance.

    If you have a lot of money, you can try to increase the maintenance of a rival. Use your Executives to spread corporations to a rival’s city - you will get increased headquarters income, whereas the other civ will not be facing increased maintenance. It’s rarely worth it, given the costs of spreading a corporation, but it can be fun sometimes. This is something I’ve actually had the AI do to me – Ramesses had spread his corporation to all cities on a small secondary continent of mine. The cities weren’t good enough to benefit much from the corporation, however, my maintenance costs did skyrocket and I was forced to adopt Mercantilism in the end.

    One of the most interesting strategic questions with corporations is whether to save Great People for it. Say you get a Great Engineer in the Renaissance age – do you go ahead and use it, or do you wait until Railroad to found Mining Inc.? Of course, you don’t have to found corporations even when you have the technology. So, use an Engineer on Creative Constructions or rush the Pentagon?

    Allowing you to, essentially, get some benefits in exchange for money, corporations are a very good feature in terms of adding strategic depth to the game. They allow you to further emphasize something your civ is already good at (like founding a beaker-producing corporation for a civ that leads in technology), or to, on the contrary, compensate for something you don’t have, such as using a hammer corporation to offset low-production terrain, all of this while creating more strategic dilemmas.

    Economic civics have been changed to affect corporations. Free Market decreases corporation maintenance by 25%, which is usually enough of a bonus to make you break even with corporation costs. Mercantilism disables foreign corporations, while leaving yours intact. Disabled corporations have absolutely no effect – provide no bonuses and incur no maintenance costs. That is the best thing to do if a rival is spreading his corporation to you and you do not want that to be the case. Environmentalism has the opposite effect to Free Market – it increases corporation maintenance by 25%.

    State Property is a whole different issue. I have reliable sources telling me that it was last seen in the vicinity of Hunt Valley, loudly screaming for help, when it was brutally tackled by BtS designers before being hit on the head with something heavy. State Property disables all corporations in your civ, whether they are yours or foreign. It is my opinion that this change makes State Property too weak and generally ruins the economy column civic. State Property remains as useful as ever if you don’t/can’t have corporations, but as soon as you found a corporation, you can no longer switch to State Property, as the results will be bad. While you will probably gain in gold overall by switching to State Property, you will lose benefits of your corporations, which is simply unacceptable in many situations.

    Consider the food corporations. You’ve spread them to your cities and are enjoying the benefits. Now, you switch to State Property… what happens? Mass starvation in your cities! While accurate historically, it’s not really optimal gameplay. Flexibility is thus lost, as you’re essentially forced into Free Market if you are using corporations.

    I should note that not everyone agrees with me on this issue. And, if I am proven wrong about the imbalance of State Property, I will be extremely happy.

    Of course, I cannot finish commenting any feature without saying something about the AI. Corporation AI is quite solid – specifically, it is well capable of judging whether a specific corporation would benefit it or not, basing its decision on whether to found a corporation on that. What’s more, AI evaluation of which cities would benefit from a corporation is fairly solid. If it has a corporation, it will wisely choose which cities to spread it to first, making sure to first spread to cities which would benefit from it the most – and perhaps ignoring cities where the corporation would be a liability. It’s also capable of spreading the corporation to foreign cities for extra headquarters income, assuming it doesn’t mind its rivals having the corporation.

    Another positive aspect of corporations is that they give you something to do in the late game. With all available land normally already taken and the space race not yet started, the Industrial Age could sometimes have the problem of not giving you enough to do, unless you were fighting a war or actively preparing for one. With corporations to aim for, you can have another set of goals as well as a means of taking your economy to another level – not necessarily getting richer or more of everything but rather re-allocating the different yields throughout your empire.

    It is fitting to also end my comments about corporations with a complaint. My main complaint with the system is that corporations favour warmongers more than builders. Specifically, they tend to favour players who spent the first half of the game warmongering. How much you gain from corporations is directly related to how many resources you have – if you have a couple sources of Iron and Copper each, Mining Inc. is okay. But if you conquered a lot and now have a total of 10 sources of these metals, along with 2 Coals and 1 Silver, the corporation becomes a powerhouse. On the other hand, this is partially counterbalanced by the fact that warmongers may find it harder to pop a Great Person in time, and may thus simply lose the corporation to some smaller builder empire. That, needless to say, is a good casus belli.

      Posting comments is disabled.

    Article Tags

    Collapse

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword Review by Solver
      by Solver

      The second expansion to Civilization IV, Beyond the Sword, has been released. In this article, Solver, a long-time Apolyton staff member, reviews the game.
      You can buy Beyond the Sword from Amazon US or Amazon UK.

      Beyond Civ4

      Civ4: Beyond the Sword is finally about to be released worldwide, to the excitement of the Civ community. I have had the pleasure of contributing to this expansion and will now give my thoughts on the finished project.

      Before saying anything else, it’s important to say that Beyond the Sword is easily the most ambitious expansion the Civ series has ever seen. It does not limit itself to the addition of new civilizations and some big feature. There are numerous new features with a significant gameplay impact, and then there’s a really high amount of minor tweaks and additions. BtS is very much unlike the Warlords expansion. Playing Warlords felt just like Civ4 with a bunch of new civilizations and some smaller stuff thrown in. Playing BtS is really different from playing Civ4 or Warlords, and player strategies will also reflect that.

      Still, no matter how many features there are, new civilizations are the most visible addition to many players. This time, we’re given ten whole new civilizations to enjoy playing with, and they’re really a mixed bag. Personally, I’m very glad to see the Mayans and Ethiopians make it, as well as the first ever Southeast Asian representatives, the Khmer. The lineup is not perfect, and on the more disappointing side there is the generic Native American civilization and the Holy Roman Empire, for which it’s fairly doubtful whether they were a civilization. Don’t forget that you can easily rename the latter into Franks, for example.

      BtS does not include any new civilization traits, and is probably the better for it. Including even one new trait would create a large number of unused trait combinations – now, on the contrary, almost all trait combinations are filled. With Boudica having Aggressive/Charismatic, bright red hair and a mean look, who would want to cross her?

      My own favorite new civ is probably the Khmer Empire. They strike me as the best civ for expansion and growth. Suryavarman is Expansive for cheaper Workers and Granaries, and also Creative. It means that you can probably get your second city up quicker (assuming you build a Worker before your Settler, so the Worker completes quicker) and you can immediately build a cheap Granary in the new city, without needing to spend time on a Monument for cultural expansion. The Baray, replacing Aqueduct, adds +1 food to the city. It may not seem like much, but while your cities are still small, that will be a useful boost to their growth.

      ...
      August 4, 2012, 20:38
    • Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver
      by Solver

      Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver

      Warlords, the first expansion pack for the highly-successful Civilization IV has just been released. I am going to take a look at how the gameplay has changed with the expansion's release, and at how the new major features blend in.


      Civer, Meet Warlords!

      Most of you probably already know what's new in Warlords at a glance. Other than six new scenarios, the expansion pack offers six new civs and a total of ten new leaders. These would be the Ottomans (led by Mehmed II), the Koreans (Wang Kon), the Celts (Brennus), the Vikings (Ragnar), the Carthaginians (Hannibal) and the Zulus (Shaka). Additionally, some of the old civs received new leaders – Ramesses II, Stalin, Winston Churchill and Augustus Caesar.

      More interesting than the leaders themselves are the new traits. There's whole three of them, not two, as had been originally said. They are:

      ...
      August 3, 2012, 18:30
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 3/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Yin

      Finally we come to the most subjective part of the review wherein I share with you bits of some games that I found interesting. The first is a large Pangaea map, and I'm playing a Kublai Khan, who is aggressive and creative. I chose him because for this game, I was trying to focus on FEWER cities to see if I could still win, and his creative rating helps push out my borders (though really there are much better options for the “fewer cities strategy” than Kublai Khan, but I like the guy). I also turned off space race and timed victories.

      GAME 1: "No Real Focus"


      As you can see, I started off with the most vital resource in life: wine (which I also include to mean beer or any other intoxicating drink). No matter what, my people's outlook on my rule will be helped by having them too sloshed to care.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:36
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 2/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Soren

      Another rarely used method of reviewing a game is to judge it against the developer's stated goals. Perhaps this is hard in many cases because developer's goals aren't always there in anything more than marketing hype. Soren, however, wrote one of the best Afterwords I have read in a gaming manual, and I think his view of CivIV deserves some discussion. First, he acknowledges that “there are a thousand ways to make a great game about all of civilization – we only get to make one of them.” What does he think he made with CivIV, and what do I, Mr. Random Reviewer, think of the results?

      NOTE: The “dialogue” here is made up. I'm sure the real Soren would say things far more brilliantly.


      1. SOREN: Sticking with turn-based allows for “a series of overlapping mini-goals".

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:29
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 1/3)
      by yin26
      Author Profile
      Yin26

      A long-time "on" and "off" poster on Apolyton Civilization Site's forums and strategy gamer, he has been notably vocal and critical in the past of Alpha Centauri, Civilization: Call to Power and more recently Civilization III.

      The 34-year-old lives in New Haven, Connecticut with his wife and two young daughters. He is working on funding for university students to study East Asian languages in China, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan.

      Civilization 4 Review by 'yin26'

      CivIV tries to do more with less (fewer units, fewer cities, etc.) -– and often succeeds, at least through an engaging early game. New twists, such as Great People and battlefield promotions, also allow for some wonderfully fresh strategic possibilities, even if these take some time to learn and appreciate. This approach solves many old Civ problems while introducing some novel gameplay, and any serious Civer should try CivIV just to see these elements in action.

      But an overly rapid progression up the tech tree and what seems to be a shallow menu of available units (again, in part, because the tech progression is too fast?) quickly pushes aside the wonderful early game and the subtle nuance, giving way to a late game bogged down in the repetitive tedium that many Civ fans have long hoped would be put to bed. Not helping the situation is an interface that hinders more than inspires and a host of performance issues that threaten to push some players to relegate CivIV to the shelf until help arrives. In short, CivIV is best approached as a promising work in progress.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:17
    • Civilization 4 Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence (Part 2/2)
      by Velociryx
      PART 2: After Several Days of Non-Stop Playing... (Page 1/3) The only way to write a review worth reading is to play the hell out of the game in question, so that's what I've been doing for the last several days. I've played quick, standard, epic, and accelerated start games, some through to completion and a whole bunch of "mini-games" to test certain theories out, attempt to stress or break the game, and experiment in general. Let me break it down for you. CivIV is divided into six basic areas that require player input and management at the city level. These areas are: Population Growth (food production) Productivity (hammer production, formerly shields) Money (to be used to either line your pockets or pay for research) Nothing new there....that's standard fare 4X [(eXploration, eXpansion, eXploitation, and eXtermination)] stuff. Now add the following: Health (unhealthy cities are less productive cities) Happiness (unhappy cities are less productive cities) G-Man Rate (The rate at which your city generates "Great People" of different types) NOTE: None of these three are early game concerns....they are introduced gradually, as cities grow, and as technological research continues to develop. With the inclusion of these three areas, now we're starting to get somewhere! Now we're starting to get some interesting choices and tradeoffs! Ahhh, but there's more. In addition to these six basic areas, which are entirely "city centric," there are six additional areas that overlay the basic city-oriented structure of Civ IV, and tie it all together into a cohesive (Imperial) whole, and these are: Civ Traits/Starting Techs (each civ in the game comes with two traits and two starting techs, giving each a different set of opening abilities out the gate, and leading to a staggering variety of possible playing styles and strategies). Diplomacy/Espionage (flip sides of the same basic coin, and all about your relations/dealings with rival civs) Religion Overlay (seven different religions in all, with the option to found one or more of them, and a variety of compelling in-game benefits for doing so. Religion stands on its own, and also modifies Diplomacy (above) and Culture (below). Cultural Overlay (a measure of the overall strength, vitality, and enduring value that your civilization is creating, most prominently expressed in terms of how far your borders extend from your cities, and quite powerful in this regard, as it can allow cultural absorption of nearby rival cities, and/or bring in wholly new resources into your sphere of influence). Civics Overlay (governmental choices in the same vein as SMAC's Social Engineering Table, with effects that modify existing in-game conditions, and at time, open up wholly new possibilities (ie, slavery allowing population to be sacrificed to the completion of a building you're working on)). Empire Overlay (increasing maintenance costs for founding additional cities, based on the number you have, and their distance from your capitol. This tends to put the brakes on rampant expansion (at least on higher difficulty levels), as you will reach a point where the maintenance costs for a newly founded city are not worth what it generates each turn in gold. At that point, your treasury goes negative, and must be offset by slowing down research, which is the kiss of death...thus, measured growth is the new key to success). By now, we're getting verging on genuine complexity, and that's a good thing, but there's even more! Added to all of that is the fact that we've got a good (largish), robust tech tree with and/or branches (multi-linear...multiple possible paths to the same end-point, new territory for Civ, and very dynamic and exciting!). Even better, gone is the notion of "speedbump" techs...techs you HAVE TO research, but that don't do anything for you in the way of providing some kind of in-game benefit. The tech tree, how to attack it, and what your strategic goals are is really a mini-game all by itself, with the rewards for playing that particular game well being manifold, and range from being the father of one or more religions, to being the first to be in a position to afford another round of expansion, or being an early era production titan by reaching Forges first, making choices about what wonders to build, and what you may have to give up in the attempt... In short, the tech tree alone opens up enormous avenues of experimentation, and it is but a single element of the whole! Combat in Civ is somewhat weak (which keeps with tradition, in this regard, because combat in Civ has always been somewhat weak), but as I have argued many times in the past, at its core, Civ is NOT a war game, but an empire building game, and its aim is to allow the player to experience the whole width and bredth of human history. As such, combat has its place and ...
      July 28, 2012, 17:41
    Working...
    X