Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  
  • New Trait Ratings

  • Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver

    New Trait Ratings

    My opinion is that all of the new traits are fairly well balanced, although Charismatic is a very powerful trait which, just like Financial, is useful in any situation. Here's my look on the trait trio.

    Charismatic

    Charismatic is a universally useful powerful trait. I'm hard-pressed to imagine a situation where extra happiness is not useful. A free +1 happiness bonus equals what you would get from founding a religion and having it in all your cities. The second +1 from Monuments (which replace Obelisks from the original game) is equivalent to having a Temple from a religion. Those Monuments are a pretty high priority building in many starts, to expand your borders, and having them double as happiness boosters is certainly a positive thing.

    Most of the time, you are going to think of this bonus as a nice boost. However, sometimes it makes the difference between having a good start and a poor one. This is true in situations where you have no immediately accessible luxury resources in the vicinity of your starting positions. In that case, Charismatic makes the start survivable. The bonus from BroadcastTowers is, as you would expect, not very useful – it's a late-game building, by which time you should generally have more than enough happiness unless you are at war.

    The other bonus of Charismatic is also very useful. -25% XP needed for promotions means that you can promote your units earlier. You still need 2 and 4 XP for the first and second promotions respectively (second promotion needing one less XP is hardly relevant) , but the third promotion comes at 8 XP instead of 10, and the fourth one comes at 14 instead of 17. Over time, I've grown to have a lot of respect for this bonus.

    As I see it, the real bonus isn't that 8 XP promotion. Sure, it's nice. For mounted units with a Barracks and Stable, you get 5 XP upon production, and after two victories it's probably going to promote. The real bonus, to me, is the greater ease of getting highly promoted units. Units with four and five promotions become really good – you can specialize them to be uber city takers, or just the best all-round combat units for the battlefields. With the Charismatic trait, you are going to have more of such elites, which is only a good thing.

    Of course, this also makes one trick that everyone loves easier. Specifically, having City Raider III Macemen to upgrade to Grenadiers later. With Charismatic, such Macemen should not be in short supply, and many players have learnt their might when upgraded to Grenadiers.

    Finally, the cheaper promotions are also useful for builders on the defense. In this case, there's a lot of pleasure to be derived from the ability to have City Garrison III promoted units with only 8 XP. And I'm not even going to mention what the combination of Protective/Charismatic can do defensively.

    Charismatic, undoubtedly, is going to become one of the favourites of the Civ4 community.

    Imperialistic

    Imperialistic is this is a rather interesting trait as well. It gives you a rather interesting ability to shoot yourself in the foot. +50% Settler production sounds pretty good, and it is. Note that it doesn't mean you build Settlers in half as many turns as non-Imperialistic civs. It's actually about one third faster. In the early game this means that you will be able to expand a little bit faster, getting your second and third city in place sooner. Sometimes, this will make you lucky enough to grab a spot before an enemy would. But, of course, there's a little drawback - you found cities earlier, you pay maintenance earlier. Get too excited about faster Settler production, and you will build more cities than you can afford at that point in time, which in Civ4 is a sure way to each an all-out economic crisis.

    +100% Great General emergence means that you gain twice as many Great General points from all battles. It means that you'll be getting your first General (Normal speed assumed) after 15 victorious battles at most, though more likely 10 or even less. Of course, the usefulness of this is tied directly to the usefulness of Great Generals themselves. Given that Generals are a nice boost to your military situation, overall, this bonus results in a better military. A couple of extra Military Academies for more units produced, or a couple more Military Instructors for a better trained army is pretty good.

    I also see this as a good builder bonus. Builders will typically fight few battles - hence, they also tend to have fewer Great Generals. An Imperialistic builder is much more likely to get a second General, even from fighting just defensive wars, and even a third General isn't entirely out of the question. Then again, most Imperialistic leaders (with the exception of Victoria) make damn good warmongers. Don't underestimate the ability of going on a Praetorian-induced rampage as Julius Caesar, bringing in numerous Great Generals as you do that.

    Protective – I think this is a trait which has the potential to cause a lot of debate. As the name would indicate, it's a rather useful trait for defence. The AI, however, has always had issues at this specific part of the game, mounting a strong offensive vs. cities (although admittedly, there have been improvements in Warlords). Hence, the boosted city defence is going to be useful in some games, but not all. Builders are probably going to benefit more, as they are more likely to be attacked on their own turf. In multiplayer, it's going to be a nice boost for city defenders, as attacks in online games tend to be more brutal.

    However, the part of the Protective bonus that gives Drill I is noteworthy. Drill I, for archery units, is a considerable bonus. It immediately opens up the possibility of further promotions along the same line, allowing you to have Drill II or even Drill III units upon production. Also, Drill I now gives access to the unit-type-specific promotions: Shock and Cover. That means you can promote a Protective Archer, with its free Drill I, immediately to Shock.

    In single player games, you're going to notice that Protective civilizations are a bit of a pain to attack early on. The AI doesn't hesitate to build Barracks, so it will have City Garrison II promoted Archers soon, with Drill I at that. As you'd expect, these cities are slightly harder to attack.

    Protective

    My favourite part of the Protective trait, though, is the Crossbowman unit. With a free Drill I, it becomes very potent when promoted along the Drill line. First strikes generally give a greater advantage if otherwise the combat odds are in favour of your unit or even. Crossbowmen have odds well in favour of them vs. melee units, and generally good odds out in the field. Promoting them with further Drill promotions makes Protective Crossbowmen very good field units indeed.

    On defence, Protective becomes even more powerful if coupled with Charismatic. It can mean City Garrison III + Drill I at 5 XP, and, say, Drill II at 8 XP. Those are some wickedly good defenders. Churchill has this trait combination, and if he's your selected target for an early expansion war, be sure to bring more troops!

    Gunpowder units also receive these two free promotions. City Garrison doesn't hurt, of course, particularly if you are actually going to use some Musketmen or Riflemen to defend cities. I find that it happens often enough, even if only for a few turns in a newly conquered city. Drill I, though, only gives gunpowder units a chance at one first strike, without access to further Drill promotions. Not really a significant bonus then, but still gives your units a slight edge.

    Cheaper Walls and Castles is no groundbreaking bonus. Walls are already pretty cheap, but they are more useful in Warlords, too. Walls are required to build Castles, and Castles now give +1 trade route. Depending on the city and the general situation, it can be a fairly good boost of commerce. In the original Civ4, I would rarely build Walls, only in cities I was sure would be attacked, and almost never built Castles, particularly given how soon the arrival of gunpowder units made them obsolete. In Warlords, however, I will build Walls more often, to gain access to a Castle later. After all, having one in each city provides a bonus to economy equivalent to running Free Market. If you are Protective, you should probably take the time to build those Walls and Castles now.

    My bottom line for Protective is, it's a fairly situational trait, and one that you actually have to try to make the most use of. The rewards are worth it in the end, though.

      Posting comments is disabled.

    Article Tags

    Collapse

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword Review by Solver
      by Solver

      The second expansion to Civilization IV, Beyond the Sword, has been released. In this article, Solver, a long-time Apolyton staff member, reviews the game.
      You can buy Beyond the Sword from Amazon US or Amazon UK.

      Beyond Civ4

      Civ4: Beyond the Sword is finally about to be released worldwide, to the excitement of the Civ community. I have had the pleasure of contributing to this expansion and will now give my thoughts on the finished project.

      Before saying anything else, it’s important to say that Beyond the Sword is easily the most ambitious expansion the Civ series has ever seen. It does not limit itself to the addition of new civilizations and some big feature. There are numerous new features with a significant gameplay impact, and then there’s a really high amount of minor tweaks and additions. BtS is very much unlike the Warlords expansion. Playing Warlords felt just like Civ4 with a bunch of new civilizations and some smaller stuff thrown in. Playing BtS is really different from playing Civ4 or Warlords, and player strategies will also reflect that.

      Still, no matter how many features there are, new civilizations are the most visible addition to many players. This time, we’re given ten whole new civilizations to enjoy playing with, and they’re really a mixed bag. Personally, I’m very glad to see the Mayans and Ethiopians make it, as well as the first ever Southeast Asian representatives, the Khmer. The lineup is not perfect, and on the more disappointing side there is the generic Native American civilization and the Holy Roman Empire, for which it’s fairly doubtful whether they were a civilization. Don’t forget that you can easily rename the latter into Franks, for example.

      BtS does not include any new civilization traits, and is probably the better for it. Including even one new trait would create a large number of unused trait combinations – now, on the contrary, almost all trait combinations are filled. With Boudica having Aggressive/Charismatic, bright red hair and a mean look, who would want to cross her?

      My own favorite new civ is probably the Khmer Empire. They strike me as the best civ for expansion and growth. Suryavarman is Expansive for cheaper Workers and Granaries, and also Creative. It means that you can probably get your second city up quicker (assuming you build a Worker before your Settler, so the Worker completes quicker) and you can immediately build a cheap Granary in the new city, without needing to spend time on a Monument for cultural expansion. The Baray, replacing Aqueduct, adds +1 food to the city. It may not seem like much, but while your cities are still small, that will be a useful boost to their growth.

      ...
      August 4, 2012, 20:38
    • Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver
      by Solver

      Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver

      Warlords, the first expansion pack for the highly-successful Civilization IV has just been released. I am going to take a look at how the gameplay has changed with the expansion's release, and at how the new major features blend in.


      Civer, Meet Warlords!

      Most of you probably already know what's new in Warlords at a glance. Other than six new scenarios, the expansion pack offers six new civs and a total of ten new leaders. These would be the Ottomans (led by Mehmed II), the Koreans (Wang Kon), the Celts (Brennus), the Vikings (Ragnar), the Carthaginians (Hannibal) and the Zulus (Shaka). Additionally, some of the old civs received new leaders – Ramesses II, Stalin, Winston Churchill and Augustus Caesar.

      More interesting than the leaders themselves are the new traits. There's whole three of them, not two, as had been originally said. They are:

      ...
      August 3, 2012, 18:30
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 3/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Yin

      Finally we come to the most subjective part of the review wherein I share with you bits of some games that I found interesting. The first is a large Pangaea map, and I'm playing a Kublai Khan, who is aggressive and creative. I chose him because for this game, I was trying to focus on FEWER cities to see if I could still win, and his creative rating helps push out my borders (though really there are much better options for the “fewer cities strategy” than Kublai Khan, but I like the guy). I also turned off space race and timed victories.

      GAME 1: "No Real Focus"


      As you can see, I started off with the most vital resource in life: wine (which I also include to mean beer or any other intoxicating drink). No matter what, my people's outlook on my rule will be helped by having them too sloshed to care.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:36
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 2/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Soren

      Another rarely used method of reviewing a game is to judge it against the developer's stated goals. Perhaps this is hard in many cases because developer's goals aren't always there in anything more than marketing hype. Soren, however, wrote one of the best Afterwords I have read in a gaming manual, and I think his view of CivIV deserves some discussion. First, he acknowledges that “there are a thousand ways to make a great game about all of civilization – we only get to make one of them.” What does he think he made with CivIV, and what do I, Mr. Random Reviewer, think of the results?

      NOTE: The “dialogue” here is made up. I'm sure the real Soren would say things far more brilliantly.


      1. SOREN: Sticking with turn-based allows for “a series of overlapping mini-goals".

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:29
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 1/3)
      by yin26
      Author Profile
      Yin26

      A long-time "on" and "off" poster on Apolyton Civilization Site's forums and strategy gamer, he has been notably vocal and critical in the past of Alpha Centauri, Civilization: Call to Power and more recently Civilization III.

      The 34-year-old lives in New Haven, Connecticut with his wife and two young daughters. He is working on funding for university students to study East Asian languages in China, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan.

      Civilization 4 Review by 'yin26'

      CivIV tries to do more with less (fewer units, fewer cities, etc.) -– and often succeeds, at least through an engaging early game. New twists, such as Great People and battlefield promotions, also allow for some wonderfully fresh strategic possibilities, even if these take some time to learn and appreciate. This approach solves many old Civ problems while introducing some novel gameplay, and any serious Civer should try CivIV just to see these elements in action.

      But an overly rapid progression up the tech tree and what seems to be a shallow menu of available units (again, in part, because the tech progression is too fast?) quickly pushes aside the wonderful early game and the subtle nuance, giving way to a late game bogged down in the repetitive tedium that many Civ fans have long hoped would be put to bed. Not helping the situation is an interface that hinders more than inspires and a host of performance issues that threaten to push some players to relegate CivIV to the shelf until help arrives. In short, CivIV is best approached as a promising work in progress.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:17
    • Civilization 4 Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence (Part 2/2)
      by Velociryx
      PART 2: After Several Days of Non-Stop Playing... (Page 1/3) The only way to write a review worth reading is to play the hell out of the game in question, so that's what I've been doing for the last several days. I've played quick, standard, epic, and accelerated start games, some through to completion and a whole bunch of "mini-games" to test certain theories out, attempt to stress or break the game, and experiment in general. Let me break it down for you. CivIV is divided into six basic areas that require player input and management at the city level. These areas are: Population Growth (food production) Productivity (hammer production, formerly shields) Money (to be used to either line your pockets or pay for research) Nothing new there....that's standard fare 4X [(eXploration, eXpansion, eXploitation, and eXtermination)] stuff. Now add the following: Health (unhealthy cities are less productive cities) Happiness (unhappy cities are less productive cities) G-Man Rate (The rate at which your city generates "Great People" of different types) NOTE: None of these three are early game concerns....they are introduced gradually, as cities grow, and as technological research continues to develop. With the inclusion of these three areas, now we're starting to get somewhere! Now we're starting to get some interesting choices and tradeoffs! Ahhh, but there's more. In addition to these six basic areas, which are entirely "city centric," there are six additional areas that overlay the basic city-oriented structure of Civ IV, and tie it all together into a cohesive (Imperial) whole, and these are: Civ Traits/Starting Techs (each civ in the game comes with two traits and two starting techs, giving each a different set of opening abilities out the gate, and leading to a staggering variety of possible playing styles and strategies). Diplomacy/Espionage (flip sides of the same basic coin, and all about your relations/dealings with rival civs) Religion Overlay (seven different religions in all, with the option to found one or more of them, and a variety of compelling in-game benefits for doing so. Religion stands on its own, and also modifies Diplomacy (above) and Culture (below). Cultural Overlay (a measure of the overall strength, vitality, and enduring value that your civilization is creating, most prominently expressed in terms of how far your borders extend from your cities, and quite powerful in this regard, as it can allow cultural absorption of nearby rival cities, and/or bring in wholly new resources into your sphere of influence). Civics Overlay (governmental choices in the same vein as SMAC's Social Engineering Table, with effects that modify existing in-game conditions, and at time, open up wholly new possibilities (ie, slavery allowing population to be sacrificed to the completion of a building you're working on)). Empire Overlay (increasing maintenance costs for founding additional cities, based on the number you have, and their distance from your capitol. This tends to put the brakes on rampant expansion (at least on higher difficulty levels), as you will reach a point where the maintenance costs for a newly founded city are not worth what it generates each turn in gold. At that point, your treasury goes negative, and must be offset by slowing down research, which is the kiss of death...thus, measured growth is the new key to success). By now, we're getting verging on genuine complexity, and that's a good thing, but there's even more! Added to all of that is the fact that we've got a good (largish), robust tech tree with and/or branches (multi-linear...multiple possible paths to the same end-point, new territory for Civ, and very dynamic and exciting!). Even better, gone is the notion of "speedbump" techs...techs you HAVE TO research, but that don't do anything for you in the way of providing some kind of in-game benefit. The tech tree, how to attack it, and what your strategic goals are is really a mini-game all by itself, with the rewards for playing that particular game well being manifold, and range from being the father of one or more religions, to being the first to be in a position to afford another round of expansion, or being an early era production titan by reaching Forges first, making choices about what wonders to build, and what you may have to give up in the attempt... In short, the tech tree alone opens up enormous avenues of experimentation, and it is but a single element of the whole! Combat in Civ is somewhat weak (which keeps with tradition, in this regard, because combat in Civ has always been somewhat weak), but as I have argued many times in the past, at its core, Civ is NOT a war game, but an empire building game, and its aim is to allow the player to experience the whole width and bredth of human history. As such, combat has its place and ...
      July 28, 2012, 17:41
    Working...
    X