Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civilization 4 Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence (Part 1/2)

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Civilization 4 Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence (Part 1/2)

    Author Profile
    Chris Hartpence
    a.k.a. Velociryx

    Velociryx is an economist, helpdesk analyst, and author. It is in the latter capacity that he may be best known to Alpha Centauri fans as author of what has been widely described as a definitive guide to for the game's expansion pack, Alien Crossfire.

    His other writing credits include Five Days in May, a horror fiction novel favourably reviewed by The New York Times.

    Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence

    The fourth direct incarnation of the Civilization series in hand, this Civer wants to believe in a brighter future for the franchise after what he calls the disaster that was Civilization III.

    This is his detailed report. (ACS)


    PART 1: First Impressions (Page 1/2)

    First impressions are important in most things, and computer games are no exception. Make a solid first impression on me, and I'm vastly more inclined to overlook weak spots or contradictions in your design.

    Give me choices, and make them mean something (or at least have the good graces to make me feel like they do), and it'll do a lot to soothe the savage beast that tends to rear his evil head when there's just something wonky or rediculous woven into the fabric of the game. Give me attention to detail and don't skimp on the small stuff, and I'll be far less likely to bite your head off when the game engine does something absurdly unexpected.

    I, with my less-than-optimal desktop rig, dodged a great many of the initial setup bullets I've read in the "horror stories" section of the Apolyton CivIV forums (much to my relief!). The installation ran smoothly, and the game started without a hitch, upon the completion of the customary system restart, so we were off and running in that regard. The Intro Movie was impressive, even if it would only run in two-second intervals, before pausing for perhaps half a second. A minor gripe, which could be at least partly the fault of my less-than-maxed-out system. I'm willing to chalk it up to that and let it go, for one reason alone.

    I want to believe.

    Once we were through that, the game start menu came up beautifully, and the music had the same effect on me that [Alpha Centauri (SMAC)]'s introductary scene still has on me, to this day....I'm not sure there are words to describe it, but I assure you that it's a good feeling, and this makes only the second computer game to ever have that impact.

    Good sign. Equally good was the fact that before the game even begins, you're greeted with a staggering array of choices. I like choices.

    Choices are good things, and I get to make a number of them before I even start playing. Once again, the types of choices and the manner in which they're presented to me remind me of SMAC, and my fondness grows.

    At first I am taken somewhat aback by the cartoonishness of the leaders who stand and greet me in various ways as I scroll through the list of nations I can opt to lead, but despite that--and perhaps in part, because of it--I find myself laughing at some of their antics (note to game designers everywhere: This is a perfect example of something I didn't like at first glance winning me over on account of the attention to detail!)

    Selected my world type, and the various parameters I wanted to play in, and got treated to a monologue by none other than Mr. Spock! Nice touch, and interesting enough that I kept right on listening, even though the world was ready to greet me before his speech was even half done....and I'll probably do that again, too, cos the artwork is great!

    And then, one little click, and I am transported to Earth, 4000 BC, and the dawning of the Egyptian civilization....


    PART 1: Rinse and Repeat (Page 2/2)

    I did not finish my first game, and I'll tell you why.

    I was charged with the task of writing a review of CivIV. To do that, and to do it in a timely manner, I do not have the luxury of sitting down for hours on end and playing fifty or so games through to completion (not if I want to keep my job, get some sleep now and then, and stay sufficiently on my new wife's good side that she will continue to indulge me some Civ-Time, in any case!). So...my first "minigame" of Civ lasted up until the dawning of the Classical Era, and what a blast it was!

    I found myself on a continent, hemmed in by two strong rivals (the Japanese to my west, and the Rus to my east), having to contend with that, and without fully understanding how the various sub-systems in the game all worked together. It made for one nailbiting experience, I can assure you, culminating in my decision to attack the Japanese to gain additional lands. I didn't fully appreciate the mechanics of the new combat system, and so divided my attack force, hitting two of their cities in the same turn (with approximately six units each). This was an unmitigated disaster, and I found myself scrambling to fend them off after I lost my entire army in a pair of attacks which did scant damage.

    The A[rtifical] I[ntelligence (AI)] responded well (better than any AI I've seen in this type of game, kudos to Soren!), invading my territory with all manner of units, keeping enough of them together to present a credible threat in the south, and stripping my terrain enhancements away like vultures. It took decades to recover, but in the end, we beat them back, fought them to a stalemate, and eventually, took the two cities I had my sights set on. Due to our relative positions on the continent, this put me in the driver's seat, and when the first minigame ended, I was ranked second (of seven) in the world. Not bad, and I enjoyed being taken by surprise at the new combat system!

    All through the first minigame, I found myself arriving at branches in the decision tree, selecting one, and thinking to myself, "oh, oh! next time around, I'll try it this way!" and that's a very good feeling. Choice again, and there's plenty of it. Want an example of what I mean? Try this on for size:

    By now, most everybody is aware that the tech tree in CivIV is...not exactly non-linear, but rather....multi-linear, with a variety of paths to get to the same end result. This is an excellent design decision, and it spawns a variety of interesting choices and decisions, which is truly what lies at the heart and soul of games of this type.

    Now, I'm certain that as I get more games under my belt, I'll begin to drift toward one or two of the tech routes as "favorites" and begin to discern various strengths and weaknesses among them, but the point is...they exist. This, in and of itself is an enormous departure from all other Civ variants, and does an even better job than SMAC at providing interesting tech beelines and strategic choicies.

    I like it, but that's not really where I was going. My original intent was to give you an example of the ways in which that array of choices expresses itself throughout the fabric of the game. Take Wonders, for example. Big, powerful, impressive wonders (complete with Wonder Movies, yay!)...everybody likes 'em, right? So you'd think that, at first glance, the Industrious Civ Trait is at a huge advantage with regards to their construction, given their whopping 50% bonus when constructing such things.

    And...you would be wrong. Yes, they get a healthy bonus when building wonders, but it's not insurmountable, by any means! That's because there are a whole host of alternate methodologies of getting a bonus for yourself, even if your Civ-of-Choice doesn't have an industrious bone in its body!

    For example:

    • A city founded in the heart of a forest can chop its way to greatness (remove forest, gain 30 hammers)...careful with this...forests provide health benefits to your people, and once they're gone, there's no replanting...still, if you need to speed build something big...it's an option.
    • Slavery Civic - hearkens back to despotism in CivIII....need a build boost? Get a city with good food production and a Grainary, choose this Civic, and sacrifice some of the natives to the cause.
    • Certain wonders see their costs reduced by virtue of access to various natural resources (stone, marble, etc). Very handy, if you stumble across the needed resource.
    • Great People - Industrious Civs might be good at big building projects, but all it takes is one single Great Engineer to pull the rug right out from under them...and there are other Civ Traits (and civics) out there that increase the probability of your getting one of these.

    So what's that? Five completely different methodologies outlined for building Wonders...that's fantastic! (and there are probably more lurking about, but c'mon...give me a break here...this is only my first day with the game!) If the choice only ran as deep as building wonders and winding your way up the tech tree, I would say that it wasn't enough to make the game truly great, but that does not appear to be the case. My "first impression" (hearkening back to the first few lines of this review, and bringing this segment full circle) is that the game is deep, and subtle, and full of challenge and promise. This impression is counter-balanced somewhat by my experiences with CivIII. I recall that when I first began playing that title, I was bedazzled for about a week, and then the bloom was off the rose, and I was bitterly disappointed.

    So much so, in fact, that [developer] Firaxis [Games] lost me as a customer. Not that this fact kept them up late at night with worry, I am sure, but it is true nonetheless....after CivIII, I was done with them. The franchise was headed in the wrong direction, the game was deeply, perhaps even fatally flawed, and there was no band-aid fix that was going to pass muster.

    A top-to-bottom redesign was in order. Half measures just weren't getting it done. Now, I grant you...I'm still in the honeymoon phase with this game, but two things are true so far:

    1. What I've seen so far, I like very much, and I'm excited about the possibilities.
    2. All day long at work today, I've been watching the clock...counting down the hours until I can get in my car, get home, and go play some more Civ.

    From a guy who had sworn off of Firaxis games after the disaster that was CivIII, I'd say that's a fairly dramatic turnaround. Again, we're still on the honeymoon, as it were, but so far, color me impressed.

    Check out Part 2 of Velociryx' Civ4 Review.

      Posting comments is disabled.

    Article Tags

    Collapse

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword Review by Solver
      by Solver

      The second expansion to Civilization IV, Beyond the Sword, has been released. In this article, Solver, a long-time Apolyton staff member, reviews the game.
      You can buy Beyond the Sword from Amazon US or Amazon UK.

      Beyond Civ4

      Civ4: Beyond the Sword is finally about to be released worldwide, to the excitement of the Civ community. I have had the pleasure of contributing to this expansion and will now give my thoughts on the finished project.

      Before saying anything else, it’s important to say that Beyond the Sword is easily the most ambitious expansion the Civ series has ever seen. It does not limit itself to the addition of new civilizations and some big feature. There are numerous new features with a significant gameplay impact, and then there’s a really high amount of minor tweaks and additions. BtS is very much unlike the Warlords expansion. Playing Warlords felt just like Civ4 with a bunch of new civilizations and some smaller stuff thrown in. Playing BtS is really different from playing Civ4 or Warlords, and player strategies will also reflect that.

      Still, no matter how many features there are, new civilizations are the most visible addition to many players. This time, we’re given ten whole new civilizations to enjoy playing with, and they’re really a mixed bag. Personally, I’m very glad to see the Mayans and Ethiopians make it, as well as the first ever Southeast Asian representatives, the Khmer. The lineup is not perfect, and on the more disappointing side there is the generic Native American civilization and the Holy Roman Empire, for which it’s fairly doubtful whether they were a civilization. Don’t forget that you can easily rename the latter into Franks, for example.

      BtS does not include any new civilization traits, and is probably the better for it. Including even one new trait would create a large number of unused trait combinations – now, on the contrary, almost all trait combinations are filled. With Boudica having Aggressive/Charismatic, bright red hair and a mean look, who would want to cross her?

      My own favorite new civ is probably the Khmer Empire. They strike me as the best civ for expansion and growth. Suryavarman is Expansive for cheaper Workers and Granaries, and also Creative. It means that you can probably get your second city up quicker (assuming you build a Worker before your Settler, so the Worker completes quicker) and you can immediately build a cheap Granary in the new city, without needing to spend time on a Monument for cultural expansion. The Baray, replacing Aqueduct, adds +1 food to the city. It may not seem like much, but while your cities are still small, that will be a useful boost to their growth.

      ...
      August 4, 2012, 20:38
    • Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver
      by Solver

      Civilization IV: Warlords Review by Solver

      Warlords, the first expansion pack for the highly-successful Civilization IV has just been released. I am going to take a look at how the gameplay has changed with the expansion's release, and at how the new major features blend in.


      Civer, Meet Warlords!

      Most of you probably already know what's new in Warlords at a glance. Other than six new scenarios, the expansion pack offers six new civs and a total of ten new leaders. These would be the Ottomans (led by Mehmed II), the Koreans (Wang Kon), the Celts (Brennus), the Vikings (Ragnar), the Carthaginians (Hannibal) and the Zulus (Shaka). Additionally, some of the old civs received new leaders – Ramesses II, Stalin, Winston Churchill and Augustus Caesar.

      More interesting than the leaders themselves are the new traits. There's whole three of them, not two, as had been originally said. They are:

      ...
      August 3, 2012, 18:30
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 3/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Yin

      Finally we come to the most subjective part of the review wherein I share with you bits of some games that I found interesting. The first is a large Pangaea map, and I'm playing a Kublai Khan, who is aggressive and creative. I chose him because for this game, I was trying to focus on FEWER cities to see if I could still win, and his creative rating helps push out my borders (though really there are much better options for the “fewer cities strategy” than Kublai Khan, but I like the guy). I also turned off space race and timed victories.

      GAME 1: "No Real Focus"


      As you can see, I started off with the most vital resource in life: wine (which I also include to mean beer or any other intoxicating drink). No matter what, my people's outlook on my rule will be helped by having them too sloshed to care.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:36
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 2/3)
      by yin26

      CivIV According to Soren

      Another rarely used method of reviewing a game is to judge it against the developer's stated goals. Perhaps this is hard in many cases because developer's goals aren't always there in anything more than marketing hype. Soren, however, wrote one of the best Afterwords I have read in a gaming manual, and I think his view of CivIV deserves some discussion. First, he acknowledges that “there are a thousand ways to make a great game about all of civilization – we only get to make one of them.” What does he think he made with CivIV, and what do I, Mr. Random Reviewer, think of the results?

      NOTE: The “dialogue” here is made up. I'm sure the real Soren would say things far more brilliantly.


      1. SOREN: Sticking with turn-based allows for “a series of overlapping mini-goals".

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:29
    • Civilization 4 Review by "Yin26" (Part 1/3)
      by yin26
      Author Profile
      Yin26

      A long-time "on" and "off" poster on Apolyton Civilization Site's forums and strategy gamer, he has been notably vocal and critical in the past of Alpha Centauri, Civilization: Call to Power and more recently Civilization III.

      The 34-year-old lives in New Haven, Connecticut with his wife and two young daughters. He is working on funding for university students to study East Asian languages in China, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan.

      Civilization 4 Review by 'yin26'

      CivIV tries to do more with less (fewer units, fewer cities, etc.) -– and often succeeds, at least through an engaging early game. New twists, such as Great People and battlefield promotions, also allow for some wonderfully fresh strategic possibilities, even if these take some time to learn and appreciate. This approach solves many old Civ problems while introducing some novel gameplay, and any serious Civer should try CivIV just to see these elements in action.

      But an overly rapid progression up the tech tree and what seems to be a shallow menu of available units (again, in part, because the tech progression is too fast?) quickly pushes aside the wonderful early game and the subtle nuance, giving way to a late game bogged down in the repetitive tedium that many Civ fans have long hoped would be put to bed. Not helping the situation is an interface that hinders more than inspires and a host of performance issues that threaten to push some players to relegate CivIV to the shelf until help arrives. In short, CivIV is best approached as a promising work in progress.

      ...
      August 1, 2012, 18:17
    • Civilization 4 Review by Chris "Velociryx" Hartpence (Part 2/2)
      by Velociryx
      PART 2: After Several Days of Non-Stop Playing... (Page 1/3) The only way to write a review worth reading is to play the hell out of the game in question, so that's what I've been doing for the last several days. I've played quick, standard, epic, and accelerated start games, some through to completion and a whole bunch of "mini-games" to test certain theories out, attempt to stress or break the game, and experiment in general. Let me break it down for you. CivIV is divided into six basic areas that require player input and management at the city level. These areas are: Population Growth (food production) Productivity (hammer production, formerly shields) Money (to be used to either line your pockets or pay for research) Nothing new there....that's standard fare 4X [(eXploration, eXpansion, eXploitation, and eXtermination)] stuff. Now add the following: Health (unhealthy cities are less productive cities) Happiness (unhappy cities are less productive cities) G-Man Rate (The rate at which your city generates "Great People" of different types) NOTE: None of these three are early game concerns....they are introduced gradually, as cities grow, and as technological research continues to develop. With the inclusion of these three areas, now we're starting to get somewhere! Now we're starting to get some interesting choices and tradeoffs! Ahhh, but there's more. In addition to these six basic areas, which are entirely "city centric," there are six additional areas that overlay the basic city-oriented structure of Civ IV, and tie it all together into a cohesive (Imperial) whole, and these are: Civ Traits/Starting Techs (each civ in the game comes with two traits and two starting techs, giving each a different set of opening abilities out the gate, and leading to a staggering variety of possible playing styles and strategies). Diplomacy/Espionage (flip sides of the same basic coin, and all about your relations/dealings with rival civs) Religion Overlay (seven different religions in all, with the option to found one or more of them, and a variety of compelling in-game benefits for doing so. Religion stands on its own, and also modifies Diplomacy (above) and Culture (below). Cultural Overlay (a measure of the overall strength, vitality, and enduring value that your civilization is creating, most prominently expressed in terms of how far your borders extend from your cities, and quite powerful in this regard, as it can allow cultural absorption of nearby rival cities, and/or bring in wholly new resources into your sphere of influence). Civics Overlay (governmental choices in the same vein as SMAC's Social Engineering Table, with effects that modify existing in-game conditions, and at time, open up wholly new possibilities (ie, slavery allowing population to be sacrificed to the completion of a building you're working on)). Empire Overlay (increasing maintenance costs for founding additional cities, based on the number you have, and their distance from your capitol. This tends to put the brakes on rampant expansion (at least on higher difficulty levels), as you will reach a point where the maintenance costs for a newly founded city are not worth what it generates each turn in gold. At that point, your treasury goes negative, and must be offset by slowing down research, which is the kiss of death...thus, measured growth is the new key to success). By now, we're getting verging on genuine complexity, and that's a good thing, but there's even more! Added to all of that is the fact that we've got a good (largish), robust tech tree with and/or branches (multi-linear...multiple possible paths to the same end-point, new territory for Civ, and very dynamic and exciting!). Even better, gone is the notion of "speedbump" techs...techs you HAVE TO research, but that don't do anything for you in the way of providing some kind of in-game benefit. The tech tree, how to attack it, and what your strategic goals are is really a mini-game all by itself, with the rewards for playing that particular game well being manifold, and range from being the father of one or more religions, to being the first to be in a position to afford another round of expansion, or being an early era production titan by reaching Forges first, making choices about what wonders to build, and what you may have to give up in the attempt... In short, the tech tree alone opens up enormous avenues of experimentation, and it is but a single element of the whole! Combat in Civ is somewhat weak (which keeps with tradition, in this regard, because combat in Civ has always been somewhat weak), but as I have argued many times in the past, at its core, Civ is NOT a war game, but an empire building game, and its aim is to allow the player to experience the whole width and bredth of human history. As such, combat has its place and ...
      July 28, 2012, 17:41
    Working...
    X