Announcement

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:31

You read my summary, GP? It's a page ago or so...

**Asher** · January 20, 2003, 22:32

Originally posted by Willem
I'd say it has more to do with a lack of a viable alternative.

PCs are more viable than Chretien and his cronies.

**Ben Kenobi** · January 20, 2003, 22:35

I'm still having a hard time seperating the PC's from the Liberal party.

Guess I could tell if I had a microscope.

**TCO** · January 20, 2003, 22:36

Originally posted by Frogger
You read my summary, GP? It's a page ago or so...

Thanks. It was very well done. Just didn't anything to say in response. But it was educational.

**Willem** · January 20, 2003, 22:37

Originally posted by Asher
Who cares what that commie bastard did in the past under the PC banner?

If the voters in Canada weren't so stupid they'd realize he ****ed things up because he was left wing.

Hell, he's from Quebec, that's bad enough.

Left wing? You've obviously spent to much time in that Alberta sun lately. If you think that Mulroney was left wing, you must be bordering on Fascist. All the more reason why the CA should never, ever be allowed to rule this country.

As for your Quebec comment, I'm sure they feel the same way about Alberta. A lot of people here in Ontario certainly do. And you're certainly not going to gain any sympathy for your province with statements like that.

**TCO** · January 20, 2003, 22:41

Originally posted by Willem

Left wing? You've obviously spent to much time in that Alberta sun lately. If you think that Mulroney was left wing, you must be bordering on Fascist. All the more reason why the CA should never, ever be allowed to rule this country.

As for your Quebec comment, I'm sure they feel the same way about Alberta. A lot of people here in Ontario certainly do. And you're certainly not going to gain any sympathy for your province with statements like that.

Compare him to a US politician. Where would he fit in our spectrum?

**Willem** · January 20, 2003, 22:42

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Is that any worse than what the Liberals currently have going for them?

His administration was perhaps the most corrupt that Canada has ever seen. There was all sorts of backroom deals going on within his party, and his caucus. The incidents that have occured with the current Liberals are mild in comparison.

And a lot of people are still sore at him for bringing in the Free Trade Agreement, and the Goods and Services Tax.

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:43

GP

US rightist Democrat.

**Ben Kenobi** · January 20, 2003, 22:43

If the whole country hates Mulroney so much to reject the PC's, why do they get so many votes in Ontario?

If he's from Quebec, why don't Quebeckers vote PC?

The west wants a share of power, and I don't see the PC offering us anything.

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:44

Lieberman or similar.

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:45

Originally posted by obiwan18
If the whole country hates Mulroney so much to reject the PC's, why do they get so many votes in Ontario?

If he's from Quebec, why don't Quebeckers vote PC?

The west wants a share of power, and I don't see the PC offering us anything.

Quebecers did vote PC in the late 80s.

And Ontario the split is still 50-30 for the Liberals over the PC

**TCO** · January 20, 2003, 22:45

Re: GP

Originally posted by Frogger
US rightist Democrat.

Like Lieberman? And that's considered fascism?

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:45

Hah. Did you read my second post.

**KrazyHorse** · January 20, 2003, 22:46

Re: Re: GP

Originally posted by GP

Like Lieberman? And that's considered fascism?

He was also a bit of a demagogue. And corrupt as hell.

**TCO** · January 20, 2003, 22:46

Originally posted by Frogger
Hah. Did you read my second post.

No...that was kind of a psychic moment.

Announcement

10.5%

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment