[serious] Off Topic Moderation Input - Part 2

[Wezil]

What did DFG do to earn 6 months?

How can we argue appropriateness without full disclosure?

[rah]

If there could only be such quick action on BAD copycat threads. It's out of control and making things difficult. I've wasted a lot of time clicking on them thinking I was checking in on the original.
It wouldn't bother me as much if they were funny, but most are just lame. Granted I know it means extra work, but not that much.

[loinburger]

****ing animal

[Jon Miller]

Docfeelgood banned for 6 months.

JM

[Kidlicious]

You're worse than Ben.

[loinburger]

That's incorrect, there have been laws that stipulate that Christians be thrown to the lions. By your own admission, you would have followed these laws. Just like, by your own admission, you would have helped to enforce the Jim Crow laws.

[Kidlicious]

following the law /= throwing people to the lions

[loinburger]

Yes, that's why the brackets are there. Similar to how you've changed Dashi's quote in your signature (except you incorrectly used parentheses). What is the difference between a just law and an unjust law?

[Kidlicious]

You remove words and added some of your own ass.

[loinburger]

loinburger, I ignore your bull**** most of the time. That doesn't give you a lisence to lie about what I said.

What is the difference between a just law and an unjust law?

You said that "following the law" is Christian, full stop. I don't see how you can complain when I merely expand upon what you've said.

[Kidlicious]

So if purposefully aggravating people = Bad M'kay, why do you keep defending Ben who said he was laughing his ass off at people being aggravated by his behavior?

I'm not defending Ben. I'm saying he was treated unjustly.

[Kidlicious]

loinburger, I ignore your bull**** most of the time. That doesn't give you a lisence to lie about what I said.

[loinburger]

Don't you look at people's signitures?

I asked you to explain the difference between a just law and an unjust law, but you couldn't. The conclusion is that you would have had no reason to oppose the illegality of Christianity in the time of the early Roman empire, nor would you have a reason to oppose the illegality of Christianity in a modern nation. If you can explain the difference between a just law an and unjust law, then go ahead and do so and I'll revise my signature accordingly.

Even if he were honest, it wouldn't matter, purposefully aggravating is insidious regardless.

Then why do you want Ben unbanned?

Also, you aggravate me whenever you post something stupid. Stop being insidious.

[kentonio]

So if purposefully aggravating people = Bad M'kay, why do you keep defending Ben who said he was laughing his ass off at people being aggravated by his behavior?

[Kidlicious]

Loin deliberately aggravates people all the time. He is not, AFAICT, deliberately dishonest.

Don't you look at people's signitures?

Even if he were honest, it wouldn't matter, purposefully aggravating is insidious regardless.