Brett Kavanaugh, great justice or greatest justice?

[Proteus_MST]

Well I hope you are never in charge of hiring anyone because some poor guy that has been the victim of false accusations of rape (proven fact) will apply and you will persecute him for political reasons. You suck. Bad!

Who accused Kavanaugh of rape?
Neither Ford did (attempted rape != rape) nor AFAIK the client of Arvenatti (she didn't claim that Kavanaugh took part in the gang rapes she witnessed)

[Kidlicious]

Who accused Kavanaugh of rape?
Neither Ford did (attempted rape != rape) nor AFAIK the client of Arvenatti (she didn't claim that Kavanaugh took part in the gang rapes she witnessed)

Creepy Porn Lawyer and all of his co-conspirators. Don't be disgusting.

[Proteus_MST]

Creepy Porn Lawyer and all of his co-conspirators. Don't be disgusting.

Co-conspirators?
Did Breitbart tell you this? Or Sean Hannity?

[rah]

Yet when reports are fabricated that Mueller was inappropriate Kid will believe them. We can all count on it.

[Kidlicious]

Co-conspirators?
Did Breitbart tell you this? Or Sean Hannity?

You're a ****ing creep.

[rah]

So Breitbart it is.

[Ming]

You're a ****ing creep.

Again Kid, be civil or go away

[Broken_Erika]

You're a ****ing creep.

Leave Radiohead out of this!

[Aeson]

For Trump supporters, wonton belligerence and partisanship is a feature, not a bug.

[ZEE]

Aren't they wonderful!

Sent from my HTC Desire 626 using Tapatalk

[Kidlicious]

Citing judicial ethics concerns, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh declined more than $600,000 that was donated to aid his family during the firestorm over sexual misconduct allegations that plagued his confirmation. The judge’s decision was announced on Tuesday in a message posted on the online fundraising page that gathered the funds.

[Kidlicious]

For Trump supporters, wonton belligerence and partisanship is a feature, not a bug.

And for you smears and false accusations are a daily feature. Wonder what tomorrow will bring.

[Aeson]

I certainly am not advocating for someone who smears and falsely accuses others to be on SCOTUS.

[Aeson]

You on the other hand love Kavanaugh for his baseless conspiracy theory he proffered in his opening statement.

[Berzerker]

Looks like Ben wont be telling us where Ford advocated smearing Gorsuch with false accusations, he's too busy smearing Ford with false accusations.

You'd call her a tobacco lobbyist if she did the same for studies on tobacco. Same here. She's very well connected with the abortion industry. Kavanaugh means an end to that gravy train if the pill manufacturer loses it's largest market.

Lobbyists are not researchers. How is she connected to the abortion industry? She did medical research on a drug used to treat Cushing's Disease, right? Thats your smoking gun? Does she make money from the sale of drugs she has researched? Looks to me like she's been spending her time at universities teaching and researching her field and was 'farmed' out for a few years to do research for a drug company.

Years after? BS. It started at the same time she went public to smear Kavanaugh. Also I thought her lawyers were working pro bono? Or was this another lie?

She told her husband Kavanaugh's name years ago.

She has significant incentives to both.

Repeating that doesn't make it true, I'd love to hear what incentive she had to put her family at risk. She studied a drug. So what? Does she make money from it? You're not answering that.

There's a lot of money tied up in the abortion industry.

So where is your proof she's making money off abortion.

From Senate Democrats?

Easy. CNN quotes them in September saying this: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/09/polit...ber/index.html

The title of your link says: "This is the narrow path to a Democratic Senate"

How does that mean the Dems were favored to take the Senate? And I dont see any quotes of Senate Democrats.

And that doesn't strike you as significant?

NO! I already told you, I've been to many parties I cant remember. If I was under oath and asked if I remember a party on July 1st 1982 I'd say no. If I was asked if I deny being at that party, I'd say no. I cant remember. That doesn't mean I wasn't at a party on that day.

It's been eyeopening how much you've been attacking Kavanaugh for drinking alcohol.

I dont care if he drank alcohol, its what he did while drinking thats the issue. We wouldn't be having this discussion if all Ford did was tell us Kavanaugh liked to drink. But you decided that makes me a prohibitionist?

So why make an overly transparent lie in an attempt to delay the proceedings further?

Why is it a lie? The delay is irrelevant, the GOP has until January at the very least to get a judge on the court. The delay was caused by Ford's reluctance to go public, she wanted to remain anonymous.