what happened to the großrossiya thread

[Serb]

That's a typical example of Western ignorance/result of western propaganda.

p.s. Yeah, keep laughing!

[Aeson]

Yes, both Nazism and Communism are bull**** ideologies, thanks for pointing out that similarity.

[Serb]

Keep lying and double talking!

All what Communism and Nazism have in common is... zero... nothing!
They are the opposite ideologies. And claiming them to be the same, you are just showing yourself a moron, who doesn't give a clue about the topic = moron.
Have a nice day, anyway. I'm out.

[Aeson]

Communism and Nazism are both authoritarian. How can something be the opposite when they share a common factor?

[Serb]

Because their goals are opposite!

[Serb]

Secondly - that is bull**** that Communism is authoritarian. You are not talking about ideologies, you are talking about your American dogmas. That is silly, really!

[Serb]

Whatever!/Лови!

[Aeson]

Both Communism and Nazism are authoritarian forms of government. All your weeping and gnashing of teeth isn't going to change that.

[Serb]

1) Communism is not an authoritarian form of government.
If you are meaning by communism "USSR" - then you are God damn wrong .Calling Communism authoritarian, that's like calling USA a democracy!
2) Nazism, as a form of fascism - IS authoritarian.
3) The Communism is based on science - you like it or not, you capitalist pigs (smile), but we will pwn you in the end, if not us, then our successors. That is just pure f*cking science!
4) Nazism is based on hatred and nothing else. It's based on assumption that one nation is superior/exceptional.
The Communism is about the opposite - it's about internationalism, that all people are equal.

[Serb]

Out

[Aeson]

Communism is necessarily authoritarian.

You can have forms of socialism which fall on the libertarian side if the spectrum, but big C Communism must be authoritarian to force people to go against their nature. The USSR was authoritarian.

[Serb]

Communism is necessarily authoritarian.

Pure bullsh!t

You can have forms of socialism which fall on the libertarian side if the spectrum, but big C Communism must be authoritarian to force people to go against their nature.

Pure bull**** - the nature of the people is to be COMMUNAL, not INDIVIDUAL. That's how we have achieve things. We progress only when we join our efforts - when we form a collective. One of such collective is called a Nation for example.

The USSR was authoritarian.

Sure it was, but how the f*ck it's about Communism?
USSR was an authoritarian country with a SOCIALISM regime.
Just like USA is a country with a socialism regime.
You like it or not, but' it's true.

[giblets]

Stalinism is a lot like Nazism. I guess some theoretical communism that has never existed in a modern country could be described as totally different from Nazism.

[Bereta_Eder]

Maybe stalinism can be compared to america only stalinism is better?

If we take as an example the starvation in Ukraine and miracoulously tie it with stalinism, that indirectly led to the deaths of many.
US invasions, destabilizations etc led to an equivalent amount of deaths.

However stalinism is superior to america since what it did, it mostly did to its own people.

Moving on to the schizophreny of capitalism. It takes for granted that man is a greedy, selfish being.

So far, ok. Bunch of degenerates thinking up ideas.

The really funny part comes from saying that greedy, selfish beings work best for humanity and the common good, which is apart from a logical lapse, evidently wrong.


And finally nazism doesn't even compare. In its brutality and evil.

Fascism isn't icompatible with capitalism either. It seems one needs the other throughout history.

[Bereta_Eder]

I feel a bit sad for americans though (and I'm being totally honest)

As ideological oponnents to communism they have been conditioned, it seems, to try to put on the same negative pedestral nazism and communism.

OTOH, not

It's funny