You've Been Invited to Her Place...

[notyoueither]

Why would being unionized prevent them from being suspended pending the case?

I'm thinking that would be a harder case since wrokers in unions are better protected. In most of the US and Canada you can be dismissed for very little reason.

If a unionised worker could not be suspended or fired for simple allegations, then I would have a harder time seeing students suspended or expelled from publicly funded universities.

[notyoueither]

I don't give a **** what you think. You're obviously the angry one since you have been ****ing with me for some time. All I said was eat ****. So start eating mother ****er.

Yes, we know you're angry and have issues controlling it. You're still setting your cause back by being an extremely vocal idiot.

[Kidlicious]

Yes, we know you're angry and have issues controlling it. You're still setting your cause back by being an extremely vocal idiot.

Idiots repeat themselves. Say it again, idiot.

[notyoueither]

Idiots repeat themselves. Say it again, idiot.

[Kidlicious]

Oh **** I can't say the same thing for the forth time because it's making me look like an idiot so what do I do?

[notyoueither]

You're. Really. Not. Helping. kid.

Most men don't care about the **** shows that some men go through in divorce courts, child custody, employment prospects, criminal justice. Why? They're comfortable. They haven't experienced it and the only people who have must be losers. You reinforce that view, because you post and argue your points... not well.

Seriously. The only thing you are accomplishing is to reinforce a kneejerk response among the people who read what you say. That response is, he's a loser. It's a cause for losers. Why should I care?

[notyoueither]

When they hear about it in their community, they think of you. They think another loser is whining.

Just. Stop.

[C0ckney]

How is a university disciplinary hearing about sexual misconduct different from a criminal court case trial for sexual assault? Very different. In the latter the accused has protection from false allegations, and greater evidentiary standards need to be met in order to secure convictions. In the former, allegations without proof are sufficient to establish charges.

why don't you read the thread you simpleton.

post 254:

a student may face a disciplinary hearing, and face criminal prosecution, over the same incident. in the same way that a person may be sacked for stealing from his employer and also face a criminal prosecution.

[C0ckney]

Let me reiterate. COckney, you said that you doubt that women make false allegations of rape. I told you that your feelings are no basis for kicking college kids out of school. The discussion then turned to the way these courts opperate. Are you not saying that these men get a fair trial?

you simply need to do some research and think about this a little. all you've done is demonstrated your ignorance of the issues, your inability to read, or to follow an argument, and posted a load of frankly ridiculous bull****. a typical display from you, sadly.

[Kidlicious]

you simply need to do some research and think about this a little. all you've done is demonstrated your ignorance of the issues, your inability to read, or to follow an argument, and posted a load of frankly ridiculous bull****. a typical display from you, sadly.

Ok, you are obviously just being very rude and playing some stupid childish game.

No, they are not given a fair trial. They are not presumed innocent. They can't even question the accuser.

[Kidlicious]

When they hear about it in their community, they think of you. They think another loser is whining.

Just. Stop.

I will, but you need to tell me more times.

[C0ckney]

Ok, you are obviously just being very rude and playing some stupid childish game.

No, they are not given a fair trial. They are not presumed innocent. They can't even question the accuser.

as i have already said several times, a disciplinary hearing is not a trial. someone accused of rape has exactly the same rights as someone accused of cheating on an exam or any other infraction of university rules, at a disciplinary hearing. where someone is accused of a crime (such as rape), there may also be a criminal prosecution, in which the accused will enjoy the same rights as any other defendant. we've been over this. it's not a difficult concept.

[Kidlicious]

as i have already said several times, a disciplinary hearing is not a trial. someone accused of rape has exactly the same rights as someone accused of cheating on an exam or any other infraction of university rules, at a disciplinary hearing. where someone is accused of a crime (such as rape), there may also be a criminal prosecution, in which the accused will enjoy the same rights as any other defendant. we've been over this. it's not a difficult concept.

1) Someone who cheats is presumed innocent and has the right to question his accuser. Already told you that *******. Wtf is wrong with you?

2) The whole thing started with my statement that your feelings are no basis for kicking people out of college, which makes everything you've said after that make you look like an ass.

[molly bloom]

Do you ever stop with this worthless crap?

You first. You have so much more to dam up.

[molly bloom]

Eat ****.

Erm, which book of the Old Testament is that from, Mr. Christian Person ?