GF says you need to get a better source than peerage.com, which is where she suspects you got the original reference from? She recommends you visit a proper library? She also wonders if you really are a historian?
Now that I know that the link is a giant steaming turd, that's exactly what I needed to know. I'm not going to truncate information unless I have confirmation that the link is bogus. Now I do, so I can proceed.
ACK!
I matrculated by in 2007.
One of my fellow master students is doing a historical research on Palestinian nation building in the 90s and 00s. That is history. Why then wouldn't research into the 60s be historical research? Just because it is contemporary history doesn't make it less history.
Comment