Kennedy's seat to turn Republican

[MrFun]

It never ceases to amaze just how good the Democrats are at absolutely blowing themselves up the second they gain even the slightest of advantages.

Because Republicans have never, ever made mistakes of their own that have cost their party, right?

Oh wait - the presidential election result of 2008 in reaction to the deplorable record of the Bush administration.

[rah]

That he won a second term is the Dems fault. That anyone thought that a rep would even have a chance in 2008 is the Dems fault. Yes both parties screw things up, but the dems seem to have a special knack for it. You would think that that deplorable record of the Bush administration could have been used to the Dems advantage for more than just two years.

[Imran Siddiqui]

This makes me

Something like that make me wonder if Coakley is really just a Republican plant.

[Ben Kenobi]

Because Dims can't suck on their own?

[Bosh]

Heavy turnout reported, this one will get interesting. As I previously stated, heavy turnout is a very good sign for the dems, we'll see if it out-weighs Coakley's idiocy...

[Patroklos]

That could also be a sign of pissed off voters too.

[Bosh]

*shrugs*

It also means a lot of the polls go out the window since pretty much all of them were based around there being less turnout than we're seeing.

[Drake Tungsten]

I told ya'll Coakley would win.

[Theben]

mixxnews is saying precincts are mostly reporting "low" voter turnout, but still close.

[Berzerker]

she's a terrible candidate, some people get close to 50 and their brains just dont click as well

I know

[DinoDoc]

http://twitter.com/Dave_Wasserman/statuses/7968896134

Cook Report does NOT officially call races, but if I were working for a network I would have enough #s to project: Brown Wins

[Berzerker]

by 55k or 5.5%

[OzzyKP]

Hehe, its great that the libertarians found a guy with a last name of Kennedy to run for the seat.

[DaShi]

Sigh. I'm always right.

[Darius871]

dp