Tweet
WMD or no WMD, it makes no difference. Saddam was/is a jackass, why do people insist on creating a pissing contest out of something that everyone in their right minds realize had to be done. It may have taken longer than it should have, but Saddam needed to go. Now, he's gone so let's quit *****ing, and move on with creating a new government for a new Iraq.
-
-
Saddam did nothing wrong (aside from tyring to assassinate presdient bush).Comment
-
Re: Eat this Saddam lovers
Originally posted by TCO
I know you wimps really wanted us to lose during the sandstorm and the "Stalingrad face-off".
A couple of points to this troll:
First, just because I am not a hyper-patriot does mean that I am a Saddam lover -- it just means that I am capable of objectively looking at my government's wartime policies.
Second, just because I can objectively look at my government's wartime policies, does not mean that I want my country to lose just to prove my point.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.Comment
-
some people just can't admit the war was handled badly.
Yes I know I supported the war. But that was on the assumption that Bush wouldn't **** things up as usual. I miscalculated Bush's ineptness.
Easily the worst president ever. He's not even a conservative! That dickhead wouldn't cut spending. What good is cutting taxes without cutting spending? ****ing *******.
We should have never attacked Iraq with Bush as president. Maybe another president could have done a better job. We should have waited a few years before attacking Iraq.Comment
-
Re: Re: Eat this Saddam lovers
I thought that was the definition of a saddam lover.Originally posted by MrFun
First, just because I am not a hyper-patriot does mean that I am a Saddam lover -- it just means that I am capable of objectively looking at my government's wartime policies.
Safer worlds through superior firepowerComment
-
NOTA lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.Comment
-
“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)Comment
-
just because I am not a hyper-patriot does mean that I am a Saddam lover
Comment
-
That's sig material, Berz.
Mr. Fun admitting that he is a Saddam Lover.
Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!Comment
-
What next, will Slow et. a. start gloating when it becomes clear that several of Saddam's soldiers may have been armed with guns? Does this newstory provide any surprising information whatsoever?Stop Quoting BenComment
-
Does the US Administration pay you to be their poster child Sloww or is this a free lance type thing?
Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
-Richard DawkinsComment
-
Are you implying those Iraqis should be allowed to shoot back with real ammo in combat? Shock!!!
BlahComment
-
Wrong. You said, how come we can't make every bomb hit a target since they are all space-age and stuff. I remember.Originally posted by Osweld
I wasn't amazed that it couldn't be done. I was amazed that you shrugged off blowing up hostpitals full of civilians and basically said "**** happens".
But I don't see what this has to do with anything, anyways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TCO
Wrong. You said, how come we can't make every bomb hit a target since they are all space-age and stuff. I remember.
Yes. The military talks about how precise they're bombs are. how all-knowing and infallible their intelligence is. How they can, as I said, see the logo on a golf ball from a satallite. But can still blow up a red cross hostpital and not give a damn.Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse
Do It OurselvesComment
-
Re: Re: Eat this Saddam lovers
I don't think you are. This is addressed more to Roland who showed his true cards when he said he wanted to eat chips while watching the muslims and US kill each other. Who said that we had a Stalingrad when we had a 3 day delay. Who was confident that WOMD would be fabricated by US forces (or found in actuality). Who obsesses about a country he has never visited. Who sees everything in a little-brother mindset of jealousy.Originally posted by MrFun
A couple of points to this troll:
First, just because I am not a hyper-patriot does mean that I am a Saddam lover -- it just means that I am capable of objectively looking at my government's wartime policies.
Second, just because I can objectively look at my government's wartime policies, does not mean that I want my country to lose just to prove my point.Comment
Comment