Eat this Saddam lovers

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by Berzerker
Second, I've heard the explanation that the Iraqis didn't want neighbors like Iran to know if they had weapons for fear of an invasion, so, they had a "beware of dog" sign left on the fence but no dog to back it up.

Sorry, it doesnt hold water. Iraq's arsenal of wmd (as well as his heavy combat units) were considerably reduced after GW1. The wmd he had left (or was preparing to make) were not enough to bluff the Iranians if they decided to re-take Basra.

Time will tell if they have WMD buried somewhere, but I'd think we'd have gotten someone to talk by now...

We still await sadies capture despite a $25M bounty.

[MrFun]

Re: Re: Re: Eat this Saddam lovers

Originally posted by TCO


I don't think you are. This is addressed more to Roland who showed his true cards when he said he wanted to eat chips while watching the muslims and US kill each other. Who said that we had a Stalingrad when we had a 3 day delay. Who was confident that WOMD would be fabricated by US forces (or found in actuality). Who obsesses about a country he has never visited. Who sees everything in a little-brother mindset of jealousy.

How did this thread jump to four more pages in 12 hours??


Anyway, if Roland really was serious when he said he would take pleasure in US soldiers getting killed over there . . . well, we have words to describe people who think like that.

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by GePap

The claim is for creating hydrogen to fill artillery spotter balloons. Iraq bought such systems from the Brits during the Iraq-Iran war.

Actually the bio-reactors were mobile ice cream makers.

[GePap]

Hardy har..NOT

Keep up with the news. The sole piece of "evidence" the admin. could claim and even that fell apart. How pityfull.

[centrifuge]

Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat


What's unbelievable? Diss's troll, or someone falling for it?

Okay, I'm a sucker.

The unbelievable part is that there are some people around here that actually represent their views in this fashion.


My fear is that some people may actually believe that sort of $%&*. Certainly, everything that the media reports should be viewed with some cynicism.

...and indeed it is healthy to question the actions of the government.

...but to suggest that Saddam didn't have it coming is absurd.

[Proteus_MST]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


Actually, I meant "here" as my physical location in the gunshot capital of the US.

Ah, is there also such a clear difference between pre/during war and now?
No wonder

But you´ve got to admit, that there is also a difference here in Apolyton between Pre/during War and now (although maybe not as big as in Washington)

[HershOstropoler]

Originally posted by TCO
Becuase the chickenhawks were right and Roland was wrong?

Because both were wrong. But I have no interest in talking to you. It's your usual twisting of words, and then talking about the correction as evasion etc all over this thread. Have fun making an idiot of yourself.

[HershOstropoler]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Eat this Saddam lovers

Originally posted by MrFun

Anyway, if Roland really was serious when he said he would take pleasure in US soldiers getting killed over there . . . well, we have words to describe people who
think like that.

Don't believe what he pulls out of his ass.

I've been against this war because I was 99 % sure that the Bushies would mess it up, and they have. End of story.

[Dis]

all I can say is it is dangerous to support the U.S. no matter what it does.

I made that mistake. I believed the lies about supporting the U.S. during wartime.

Never again.

It is clear we shouldn't have attacked Iraq with this president.

Maybe if we had a president who knew what he was doing, then yes- we should have attacked Iraq.

[SlowwHand]

Good. Join the peckerhead crowd over there on the Extreme Left side of the room.

[Berzerker]

Oh geez, not this BS about Saddam invading Saudi Arabia again. Several months after Gulf War I, a Florida paper exposed the lie, yes, another lie from a Bush, that satellite photographs revealed Saddam's tanks had rolled into NE Saudi Arabia - the photos were bogus! They were used to convince the Saudis to let us "save" them and along with God only knows what bribes, helped do the trick.

Use a little logic, Saddam didn't invade Kuwait until after meeting with the US ambassador and getting what in effect was a green light. Saddam was told the US had no treaty with Kuwait and had no desire to get involved in an existing dispute between the 2 countries (Kuwait may have been side-drilling into Iraqi territory - stealing oil).

Hell, I'm shedding no tears over Saddam's predicament and I'm quite happy the Iraqi people are free of him, but that doesn't mean I'm somehow obliged to condone the lies and falsehoods told by the people running the US government. Just tell us the truth...

[Berzerker]

Slow

[Dis]

I'm not a peacknik!

I support war in most circumstances. I am after all, a warmonger and a whoremonger.

But I just can't shake the feeling that Bush is the most horrible president this country has ever had. Another president could have took down Iraq successfully.

[SlowwHand]

Oh bull****, Dissident.
Do you pay a speck of attention?

Hussein places armament among civilians, and does he catch hell from these people at ACS?
HELL, no. It's Bush's fault.
JUST a for instance.

[Dis]

The U.S. would do the same thing if we were in his position.

Do you expect Saddam to do things that will put him at a disadvantage against a superior force?