Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[MOBIUS]

exactly. They had decades of "neutrality" behind them as precedent and they went out of their way to willfully throw that away and lobby and struggle to join NATO. How do you explain that motivation?

​​​​​
Their neutrality prevented them from being absorbed into the Soviet sphere.

'Finlandization'

Look it up. They were ridiculed for it in the West. What is this toxic masculine need avoid losing face by standing up and fighting an obviously losing fight - instead of walking away and preserving your life...!?

How many people here would stand up to a bully, knowing that if you did you'd be beaten so badly you might even be killed, or just walk away...? We all know the answer. Not me and none of you...🤷

The Soviets wouldn't have allowed Finland to join NATO then, hence why they stayed neutral and maintained their overall independence.

You failed your homework assignment. D-👎

[Dinner]

Same with Sweden.

[Geronimo]

Um. You have no grasp of history, do you? 🙄

What did Finland do between the end of WWII and the end of the Soviet Union and why?

That is your homework, genius.

exactly. They had decades of "neutrality" behind them as precedent and they went out of their way to willfully throw that away and lobby and struggle to join NATO. How do you explain that motivation?

[MOBIUS]

Hey geniuses, where are the Ukrainian reserves to arrest the rapid disintegration of their lines in the Donbas?

Oh wait, they were squandered in Kursk...!

The Russians are engaged in multiple encircling manoeuvres that probably wouldn't be possible if Ukraine had strong strategic reserves on that front.

As I warned about and predicted.🙄

[MOBIUS]

Finland also did "what the US wanted it to do". What did Russia do in response? I mean, it is RIGHT THERE. If it wanted to, it could easily reach out and touch someone in, say, St Petersburg or Moscow. Its joining NATO is a much larger threat.

Could it be that the Winter War has not been forgotten?

That, like the mangy, lice infested lone wolf it is, Russia is only picking on prey it believes are much weaker than it is, and is counting on its growls and hackles to intimidate others away from assisting?

...

Well, that's worked out, hasn't it?

Um. You have no grasp of history, do you? 🙄

What did Finland do between the end of WWII and the end of the Soviet Union and why?

That is your homework, genius.

[The Mad Monk]

It's a bit **** when one's main ally (the US), is principally motivated by occupying the territory of, subjugating, and enfeebling its supposed 'friends' (prime example in this case, Germany. But also UK, Japan, South Korea etc.)...

What's more ****ed up is that their friends gleefully accept this maltreatment!

Ukraine maintaining its independence by joining (actually, worse, never being able to actually join) NATO!? 🤣🤣🤣

More like doing a deal with the devil!

Ukraine LOST its independence by doing what the US wanted it to do. True independence is neutrality in this situation, IMO.

Finland also did "what the US wanted it to do". What did Russia do in response? I mean, it is RIGHT THERE. If it wanted to, it could easily reach out and touch someone in, say, St Petersburg or Moscow. Its joining NATO is a much larger threat.

Could it be that the Winter War has not been forgotten?

That, like the mangy, lice infested lone wolf it is, Russia is only picking on prey it believes are much weaker than it is, and is counting on its growls and hackles to intimidate others away from assisting?

...

Well, that's worked out, hasn't it?

[BeBMan]

Can't say the Russian Army is exclusively relying on prisoners, or peole awaiting trial of course:

Last week, the Indian government announced that Russia had discharged dozens of the 91 Indians who were duped into fighting for Russian forces in the country's war with Ukraine. Several of them have since returned home, while the process to bring others back is under way. The BBC's Neyaz Farooquee spoke to some of the men about their struggles.​

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly6ve2x72xo

[Geronimo]

Is Putin running out of convicted criminals? No worries, he just expanded the recruiting to those which are not convicted yet:



snipsnapped from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrjrp7625mo

I suppose every non-premeditated murderer that failed to conceal their capital crime will now go straight to the nearest recruitment center. The murderers who successfully concealed their guilt on the other hand not only won't sign up, but also presumably, if they are charged anyway they'd probably still like their odds better in court.

[Dinner]

Didn't you read a book "Russia's Twilight War" or something like that which predicted the invasion even before Western satellites started noting the build up? Is everything you said here consistent with that author's take on the situation?

Yes, I have liked Peter Zeihan for years

[BeBMan]

Is Putin running out of convicted criminals? No worries, he just expanded the recruiting to those which are not convicted yet:

It’s no secret that prisoners have been recruited to fight in Ukraine, but BBC analysis can reveal how the initial focus on convicted criminals has shifted to include people yet to face trial.

The latest laws mean that both prosecution and defence lawyers are now legally obliged to inform people who are charged with most crimes that they have the option to go to war instead of court.

The legislation, passed in March 2024, means that if they sign up, the prosecution and any investigation will be stopped. Their cases will generally be closed completely at the end of the war.
​

snipsnapped from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrjrp7625mo

[Geronimo]

Putin is simply upset that NATO membership would prevent him from rebuilding the Soviet/Russian Empire. Remember that, agriculturally and climatically Ukraine is the best and most productive part of the former Soviet Union. Putin desperately wants it for that reason plus demographically he desperately needs the population as Russia's demographics are collapsing. I don't see that ever working out due to the current war and the feelings that has created among the Ukrainian population.

That doesn't change Putin's desperate desires for empire though.

Didn't you read a book "Russia's Twilight War" or something like that which predicted the invasion even before Western satellites started noting the build up? Is everything you said here consistent with that author's take on the situation?

[Dinner]

so you're saying NATO is intrinsically hostile to the Russian Federation? how is that? Since when? what other states can it be regarded as intrinsically "hostile" to?

Putin is simply upset that NATO membership would prevent him from rebuilding the Soviet/Russian Empire. Remember that, agriculturally and climatically Ukraine is the best and most productive part of the former Soviet Union. Putin desperately wants it for that reason plus demographically he desperately needs the population as Russia's demographics are collapsing. I don't see that ever working out due to the current war and the feelings that has created among the Ukrainian population.

That doesn't change Putin's desperate desires for empire though.

[Geronimo]

It's a bit **** when one's main ally (the US), is principally motivated by occupying the territory of, subjugating, and enfeebling its supposed 'friends' (prime example in this case, Germany. But also UK, Japan, South Korea etc.)...

What's more ****ed up is that their friends gleefully accept this maltreatment!

Ukraine maintaining its independence by joining (actually, worse, never being able to actually join) NATO!? 🤣🤣🤣

More like doing a deal with the devil!

Ukraine LOST its independence by doing what the US wanted it to do. True independence is neutrality in this situation, IMO.

Do you think the Finns and the Swedes hate true independence and that's why they worked so hard to throw away their neutrality to join NATO?

[Geronimo]

Ukraine dropping their ambition to join NATO (and thus take sides) would have dispelled Putin's motive to attack.

If Putin attacked then, world opinion would have been completely different (not just the US and its vassal states) and he would have had zero support from the likes of China, for example. Putin's interest after the toppling of the Ukraine govt in 2014 was in maintaining Russia's Black Sea port in the face of a now hostile nation on its borders.

With Ukraine declaring neutrality, it could have still strengthened its military/ties with the EU etc. Perhaps even upheld its side of the Minsk bargain etc.

Yours is the fantasy, not the other way around. 🙄

so you're saying NATO is intrinsically hostile to the Russian Federation? how is that? Since when? what other states can it be regarded as intrinsically "hostile" to?

[Dinner]

After the war is settled it will join NATO as you well know.