Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who do you tip to win the US presidential election

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Uncle Sparky View Post
    Trump loses his presidential immunity in 18 days. You think the Trump campaign has been launching a bunch of 'important' lawsuits?

    Just wait three weeks.
    You believe anything as long as there's no evidence. When there's evidence you don't believe it.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

      You believe anything as long as there's no evidence. When there's evidence you don't believe it.
      There has been lots of evidence for how criminal Donald T is ... just think about, how he deceived the students of Trump "university"

      There also has been lots of evidence brought forward by the Mueller investigation against people in Trumpsorbit.

      All ignored by you and all the other Trumpists
      Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
      Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

        There has been lots of evidence for how criminal Donald T is ... just think about, how he deceived the students of Trump "university"

        There also has been lots of evidence brought forward by the Mueller investigation against people in Trumpsorbit.

        All ignored by you and all the other Trumpists
        Mueller is a crooked bad federal cop that weaponized the government to protect other crooked FBI agents. These people are protecting the actual criminals (bad cops and crooked politicians). That's what's going on. You just keep getting fooled or something.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

          There has been lots of evidence for how criminal Donald T is ... just think about, how he deceived the students of Trump "university"

          There also has been lots of evidence brought forward by the Mueller investigation against people in Trumpsorbit.

          All ignored by you and all the other Trumpists
          What evidence of 'collusion'? Who was charged for conspiring with Russians to interfere in an election?

          Hey, wait a minute... Didn't Hillary pay foreigners to conspire with Russians? Why, yes she did. The Democrats accused Trump of doing what they did. Democrats impeached Trump for trying to investigate their corruption in Ukraine, but Democrat senators told Ukraine to help them investigate (bogus) charges against Trump. Hell, Ukrainians brought down Manafort and Democrats complained about foreigners interfering in our election?



          Comment


          • Berzerker
            Berzerker commented
            Editing a comment
            I'd probably vote for the Dems if they weren't such morally bankrupt war mongers. I almost voted for Obama while the rest of my family did, but after what he did to Libya, Syria and Yemen I'm glad I voted Libertarian. Granted he ran on an anti-war message while both his opponents supported invading Iraq.

          • Uncle Sparky
            Uncle Sparky commented
            Editing a comment
            Ha! Hahaha!!! Morally bankrupt Dems! Fvcking hypocrite! No one is as pure and good as Godhead Donald Trump. You have just taken a huge lead in the 'I am an asshat, 2021' award. If only you posted this gem four days ago...

          • Berzerker
            Berzerker commented
            Editing a comment
            I didn't vote for Trump

        • A foreign government has HRCs emails so the Democrats and crooked cops gave people like Uncle Sparky Trump Derangement Syndrome so that if that government every releases those emails they can all say its Russian disinformation. They have been using that play book for years now and they don't get it because they got messed up.
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • Yeah, so., a recording of Trump trying to blackmail the georgia sec of state was just released....
            "

            Comment


            • You know, just undeniable proof that Trump is trying to overthrow our democracy. No big deal.
              "

              Comment


              • Originally posted by EPW View Post
                Yeah, so., a recording of Trump trying to blackmail the georgia sec of state was just released....
                You can only blackmail guilty people.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • EPW
                  EPW commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Key word is "trying".

              • If Joe was innocent people could still use his loved ones against him.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                  If Joe was innocent people could still use his loved ones against him.
                  Like Director Wray?
                  I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                  - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                  Comment


                  • Just wait for the fun to begin when Trump loses the protection of the office....
                    But I'm sure Kid will call it all fake... and still claim that Biden is an even bigger crook.
                    Keep on Civin'
                    RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                    Comment


                    • Kid is right. You can (usually) only blackmail guilty people (or otherwise don't want true things to be made public). Trump was wasn't blackmailing, he was extorting or racketeering.
                      Last edited by Dauphin; January 3, 2021, 21:41.
                      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                      Comment


                      • He was just trying to get him to appoint independent investigators, which Trump is owed.
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment


                        • -Jrabbit
                          -Jrabbit commented
                          Editing a comment
                          Dude, that's just a lie. Among many his debunked claims and outright lies, he was brazenly asking for Raffensperger to change the results, then say just they had "recalculated." Making that request is against the law.
                          It's against the law.

                        • Kidlicious
                          Kidlicious commented
                          Editing a comment
                          cHaNgE tHe ReSuLtS

                        • Berzerker
                          Berzerker commented
                          Editing a comment
                          if that was true he wouldn't have spent most of his call trying to convince the secyofstate to investigate allegations of fraud

                      • A lot of people bit down hard on the fake news again.

                        "Trump Call Actually Reveals A President Deep Into Detail, With Establishment Republicans Dismissive, Unwilling, And Rejecting Transparency“I don’t know about that… I don’t have it in front of me… we’re looking into that…”


                        These weren’t the vague, non-committal words of the President of the United States on the phone call leaked by theWashington Post newspaper – which has recently taken millions of dollars from the Chinese Communist Party – this Sunday. They were the statements of the establishment Republicans on the call: Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Ryan Germany, and Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs on the January 2nd call.

                        Despite the partisan framing from the Washington Post – that the call somehow reflected Trump making demands for votes from his Republican colleagues – the President actually does no such thing. Throughout the call, the President makes clear that his calls are for election transparency, full and transparent audits, and public access. At no point does the President imply he wants votes invented or confected, as the establishment media is portraying. He even offers to recuse himself from parts of the conversation and ends by asking for “the truth… it’s just that simple.”

                        You can read the entire transcript and listen to the entire call below this article.

                        In fact the President begins the call by ripping through specifics that are never addressed by their opponents on the call: the establishment Republicans. Trump states:
                        • “We have at least 2 or 3 — anywhere from 250 to 300,000 ballots were dropped mysteriously into the rolls. Much of that had to do with Fulton County, which hasn’t been checked. We think that if you check the signatures — a real check of the signatures going back in Fulton County — you’ll find at least a couple of hundred thousand of forged signatures of people who have been forged.”
                        • He continues: “We had, I believe it’s about 4,502 voters who voted but who weren’t on the voter registration list, so it’s 4,502 who voted, but they weren’t on the voter registration roll, which they had to be. You had 18,325 vacant address voters. The address was vacant, and they’re not allowed to be counted. That’s 18,325.”
                        • And the President went on: “You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia, but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that’s 2,326.”

                        The level of granularity was actually remarkable, especially for a President that the media continues to allege is not concerned with details.

                        And the pushback from Raffensberger’s team wasn’t even particularly punchy, which is presumably why they leaked the call instead of pressing ahead with the details discussed and requested. There are several key points in the call that reflect the bad faith of Georgia’s Republican establishment leaders:
                        1. Fulton County


                        The President and his team repeatedly raise alleged violations in Fulton County, specifically charging Raffensberger and team with pivoting to Cobb County without addressing the more densely populated Fulton.

                        President Trump says here: “You sent us into Cobb County, which we didn’t want to go into. And you said it would be open to the public. So we had our experts there, they weren’t allowed into the room. But we didn’t want Cobb County. We wanted Fulton County. And you wouldn’t give it to us. Now, why aren’t we doing signature — and why can’t it be open to the public?”

                        In response, lawyer Ryan Germany simply replies: “We chose Cobb County because that was the only county where there’s been any evidence submitted that the signature verification was not properly done.”

                        Not just an admission of wrongdoing in the state, but also an admission of selectively apply rigorous standards and refusing to allow the President’s team into the most populated county in the state.
                        2. The ‘Consent Decree’


                        This has to do with the agreement signed by Republicans and Democrats in advance of the election, and why President Trump said far-left Georgia activist Stacey Abrams had “outplayed” Republicans by getting them to sign an unconstitutional agreement. The agreement itself is a word salad (read it for yourself) about what constitutes signature matching on ballots. If no side intended to defraud the election, one might argue no such “agreement” would have been required.

                        Instead of addressing this directly, Raffensberger and Germany set out to nitpick over the term “consent decree” which has been used repeatedly across national, state, and local media to describe the agreement. Even lawyers in opposition to Trump have used the term.

                        Raffensberger simply states, during the whole exchange: “It’s a settlement agreement.” His colleague Ryan Germany skirts the crux of the matter, too: “I don’t. I don’t. I don’t believe [it’s a consent decree], but I don’t have it in front of me.”
                        3. GA Lawyers Refusing Further Transparency.


                        Toward the end of the call Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is heard to say: “It sounds like we’ve got two different sides agreeing that we can look at those areas, and I assume that we can do that within the next 24 to 48 hours, to go ahead and get that reconciled so that we can look at the two claims and making sure that we get the access to the secretary of state’s data to either validate or invalidate the claims that have been made. Is that correct?”

                        Germany quips back immediately: “No, that’s not what I said,” and attempts to shut down the idea of further enquiries into the Georgia vote totals.

                        When a lawyer for the President, Kurt Hilbert, suggests, “the secretary of state could deputize the lawyers for the president so that we could access that information and private information without you having any kind of violation?” the President rightly excuses himself from knowing more, stating: “I don’t want to know who it is. You guys can do it very confidentially. You can sign a confidentiality agreement. That’s okay. I don’t need to know names.”
                        4. Ruby Freeman.


                        Not a fault of the Raffensberger team, perhaps, but the Washington Post audio originally left in references to Georgia voter counter and left-wing activist Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss. While The National Pulse makes no claims of the pair, it is bemusing that the Washington Post would redact the names, especially given how well known they have become on the internet.

                        The names were redacted a total of 18 times by the Washington Post.
                        5. ‘We Just Want The Truth.’


                        At the end of the call President Trump remarks, repeatedly: “we just want the truth.”

                        Far from being a “pressure”-filled call as the Washington Post reports it, the President went out of his way over 62 mins to go through details, obstruction, and continuously be sure that he was looking for accuracy, transparency, and public access.

                        Attorney Cleta Mitchell probably states it best during the call where she says: “…you can keep telling us and making public statement that you investigated this and nothing to see here. But we don’t know about that. All we know is what you tell us. What I don’t understand is why wouldn’t it be in everyone’s best interest to try to get to the bottom, compare the numbers, you know, if you say, because… to try to be able to get to the truth because we don’t have any way of confirming what you’re telling us. You tell us that you had an investigation at the State Farm Arena. I don’t have any report. I’ve never seen a report of investigation. I don’t know that is. I’ve been pretty involved in this, and I don’t know. And that’s just one of 25 categories.”

                        For Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to be calling for another impeachment effort over this call is both predictable and disgusting. The likelihood is “AOC” hadn’t even heard the call before responding to media requests for comment.

                        But that’s where politics and media is today – in a consistent frenzy to diminish constitutional norms while pointing the fingers in the other direction.

                        Anyone who actually listens to the call will hear President Trump being detailed and forthright. Understandably frustrated, Trump of course employs some of his characteristic New York businessman bluster. But more importantly: he speaks in a manner of someone who wants openness and transparency. And the other side simply does not.

                        That tells us all we need to know."
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment


                        • Thousands of Americans dying every day and the US pres is obsessing over an election he lost two months ago.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X