Yeah. Dang, I thought that was it. This goes on too long, getting tired of it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who do you tip to win the US presidential election
Collapse
X
-
A judge blocked the release of the results of a forensic audit of voting machines in MI. There's only one reason they would do that because you don't block results that show that there was no fraud.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Melania Trump 'just wants to go home'
Trump is now focused on Mar-a-Lago, a source said, ensuring a smooth transition out of Washington for herself and her 14-year-old-son, Barron, who one source confirms will finish his school year in Florida and not at the posh suburban Maryland private school he has attended for the last three years. While Trump has yet to concede, Melania Trump is already overseeing shipments of personal items to Mar-a-Lago from both the White House and her Trump Tower penthouse in New York City, a source at the resort confirms to CNN.In mid-November, as President Donald Trump railed against the election results, his wife, first lady Melania Trump publicly agreed with his sentiments. But privately, a handful of days after the final state tally, the first lady tasked an emissary with discreetly finding out what was available to her in terms of budget and staff allocation for post-White House life.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostA judge blocked the release of the results of a forensic audit of voting machines in MI. There's only one reason they would do that because you don't block results that show that there was no fraud.Judge denies request for restraining order to block destruction of Michigan election data
Plaintiffs to a lawsuit filed Sunday in Michigan asked a federal judge to block a request issued by Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office telling county clerks to destroy certain election data and software by Dec. 7.
U.S. District Judge Robert J. Jonker quickly denied the request for a restraining order Monday, citing a lack of timeliness, and failure to outline a clear complaint or properly certify some of the arguments made by plaintiffs who submitted affidavits with the lawsuit.
Michigan’s 2020 general election was certified Nov. 23 with one subsequent recount requested in an Eaton County state House race. The deadline to challenge election results and request a recount expired on Nov. 30.
With the election certification process nearly completed, the state Bureau of Election on Dec. 1 issued a customary letter to clerks in each of Michigan’s 83 counties ordering them to delete electronic election files and related software, including electronic poll book data, by Dec. 7.
“The (electronic pollbook) software and associated files must be deleted from all devices by the seventh calendar day following the final canvass and certification of the election (November 30, 2020), unless a petition for recount has been filed and the recount has not been completed, a post-election audit is planned but not yet been completed, or the deletion of the data has been stayed by an order of the court or Secretary of State,” the Dec. 1 memo to Michigan clerks said.
The SOS has for years sent similar instructions following elections.
Judge Parker first questioned whether the lawsuit and request for a restraining order to halt the SOS request even constituted a formal legal complaint.
First, this is standard operating procedure and has been for years... They are just following NORMAL RULES, not engaging in some cover up
Second, the original complaint was LATE and was badly put together
So there were multiple reasons the judge ruled PROPERLY in this case.
Try again Kid.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View Post
So Kid's "OPINION" is totally incorrect as usual
First, this is standard operating procedure and has been for years... They are just following NORMAL RULES, not engaging in some cover up
Second, the original complaint was LATE and was badly put together
So there were multiple reasons the judge ruled PROPERLY in this case.
Try again Kid.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
"Logic from Pennsylvania: our laws guaranteeing right to observe elections doesn't actually mean a right to "meaningfully" observe & our laws requiring a signature doesn't actually mean a signature that matches. And they wonder why they are being sued?"
- Robert BarnesI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
No there isn't. An audit was performed and they are keeping the results from the public. This is a bull**** excuse.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
Comment