Tweet
Come up with a statistical anomaly in Trump’s favor. You can't. You can't just come up with statistical anomalies. You are making things up again.
-
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
A statistical anomaly is not proof of anything.
You are the one making things up if you think that is actually PROOF of anything.
And please let know when you actually find some real proof.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
It's not ONE stat an. It's many.Originally posted by Ming View Post
Again, it shows that the reasonable belief is that Biden lost. The absurd believe is that Biden won. All of you people claiming that Biden won are absurd math deniers.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
One more time for the simple minded... It isn't PROOF OF ANYTHING.
Maybe you should go back to school and learn some more math.
Again, please let us know when you find any actual proof... Statistics prove nothing.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Most statistical anomalies are in Trump's favor. Otherwise Biden would have won Florida and probably North Carolina. Look at the statistical studies done by the Economist/etc.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
What a ****show.Comment
-
And that is not even surprising.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Trumps presidency motivated huge numbers of Democrats (and independents), even in states that seemed to be firm in the grup of the GOP,
to actually go voting instead of (as in the years before) just let their fate get dictated by the GOP voters in their state.
You saw it, for example, in the huge numbers of early voters that, in most counties, were never experienced before
(which can also be considered a statistical anomaly if compared with the presidential elections in the years before).
So I am sure that you will find lots of things that can be interpreted as statistical anomalies in Bidens favor.
(I am sure that you will even find a lot of moderate Republicans who voted in favor of heir GOP representative and senator,
but chose to vote for Joe Biden als PotUS (or maker no cross for a PotUS at all), also crating data that can be interpreted as statistical anomalies)
Insofar, I guess, Trumps presidency itself is an anomaly, as in the elections 2020 it motivated huge numbers of people on both sides of the party borders,
to not give their vote for a PotUS they liked, but rather against a PotUS they strongly disliked (or even abhorred)
(at the same time however you had fanatical Trumpists in other counties which created statistical anomalies in favor of Trump)Last edited by Proteus_MST; January 1, 2021, 14:24.Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"Comment
-
It seems that it's difficult for some people to understand what a statistical anomaly is. Trump winning Florida is not a statistical anomaly (JM), because Trump had a significant chance to win Florida. Biden getting many votes (Proteus), is not a statistical anomaly, because Biden had a good chance to get more votes. These are strawman arguments. A statistical anomaly is things like batches of ballots that are over 90% for Biden, because the chance of that happening is extremely low. And there are many statistical anomalies in Bidens favor, but none in Trump’s favor.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
True dat... it's an anomaly, and proof of NOTHING.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post It seems that it's difficult for some people to understand what a statistical anomaly is.
Try again Kid when you find some actual proof.
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Yes, how could a batch of votes from a mostly African-American neighborhood come out 90% Biden?
Comment
-
iI's an ANOMALYOriginally posted by giblets View PostYes, how could a batch of votes from a mostly African-American neighborhood come out 90% Biden?
FRAUD... we don't need any real proof, just an ANOMALY so it must be fraud
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
The actual number is 96% for Biden. They are mail-in votes so they didn't come just from one neighborhood.Originally posted by giblets View PostYes, how could a batch of votes from a mostly African-American neighborhood come out 90% Biden?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
If you go to line 8832 you can see a huge batch counted in WI. That's the point that Biden pulls ahead. It's one of the points they are talking about. It's a 168k batch so maybe rounding doesn't matter. I don't really know. I'm getting tired so maybe I'll look at it tomorrow.
Thanks for digging it up. Very interesting -
I don't think they are just from Milwaukee because mail-in votes don't come in from just one place. The most suspicious thing is that it's so much more in favor of Biden than any of the other batches that are also in favor of Biden. The next batch most in favor of Biden is 57% in favor of Biden. And this batch coincides with batch bumps in the early morning hours at other counting centers in swing states that Biden won. All of the dumps put Biden over the top.
That said, all these numbers have to be checked obviously.
-
-
It still isn't PROOF OF ANYTHING...
So until you do actually find some proof, you got nothing.
Thanks for playing.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Ha-ha! Pence is part of the Deep State and/or CCP now.
Originally posted by BBCI am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!Comment
-
But...what about the other 50(?)something lawsuits. Ooopsi.
And...the Kraken. Hrmpf.
The Supreme Court will...arrgh no.
Martial law?! Errm...only fridays.
BlahComment
Comment