Originally posted by Aeson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
was corbyn really against the remain?
Collapse
X
-
none of that bizarre nonsense even comes close to addressing my points. i would ask you to try again, but in fact it is a timely reminder of how pointless debate is with you."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
-
No, it's a feedback loop. Both the leaders and those who allow themselves to be lead down that path are to blame. The racist/xenophobic tendencies give politicians easy means to pit groups against each other.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostWait.
You mean that the purposfully dismantling of the public and social provisions fill the working class (and not only) with hate?
Well of course it does. It's only human
Comment
-
Actually, since in the US congress decides the presidential election if no one has greater than 50% of the electoral votes, having more than 2 parties if there are not already more than 2 strong parties in congress, is heavily discouraged. See Bloomberg's reasoning.Originally posted by Aeson View PostTrump is there only because Trump supporters chose him out of a large field. Hillary is there because her supporters chose her over Bernie and a couple others. And the D and R choice is because D votes D and R votes R. No one is forced to be D or R, they choose to be. If so many didn't choose to be, then there would be more options.
Everyone is responsible for their own vote. And anyone who supports a fascist with that vote is to blame for supporting fascists. You want to apologize for fascist supporters rather than accept that obvious reality.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
Your point is to hold fascists blameless for being fascist. The reality is there is no good reason to ever support fascists. So of course there's no point in your attempt to convince me it's ok to be fascist.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postnone of that bizarre nonsense even comes close to addressing my points. i would ask you to try again, but in fact it is a timely reminder of how pointless debate is with you.
Comment
-
cockney is not holding the people blameless for voting fascists.
There is a whole system behind this mechanism.
IF there is no other alternative, yes they will vote for them.
It would mean less work if the propaganda machine blew off some steam and made that other alternative present, that's all.
It's a matter of convinience
Comment
-
We vote for congress as well. But more importantly, D and R aren't necessarily the two parties and their platforms aren't necessary.Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostActually, since in the US congress decides the presidential election if no one has greater than 50% of the electoral votes, having more than 2 parties if there are not already more than 2 strong parties in congress, is heavily discouraged. See Bloomberg's reasoning.
JM
I've argued against our voting system many times, but pretending the only choice was to vote Trump or Hillary is wrong. There were plenty of other choices that simply weren't as popular.
In no case is someone blameless for how they vote (or not).
Comment
-
when you learn to read properly and debate honestly, then perhaps we can have a discussion. until then, i shan't bother.Originally posted by Aeson View PostYour point is to hold fascists blameless for being fascist. The reality is there is no good reason to ever support fascists. So of course there's no point in your attempt to convince me it's ok to be fascist."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
At this time, there is only Hillary and Trump.
The problem is that for there to be more options, people would have had to vote for their to be more options in the past. Maybe at some point people will do so, but it will have to be with the realisation that they will fail the first time but are enabling the possibility of success in 4-8 years.
That makes it really really unlikely.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
You said "who can blame them"... I pointed out they are culpable for thei choices, and you had a hissy fit then ran away.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postwhen you learn to read properly and debate honestly, then perhaps we can have a discussion. until then, i shan't bother.
All you have to do is admit people are to blame for their own choices, that fascist are to blame for being fascist, and there's no problem.
Comment
-
nope, sorry. you had your chance and i'm just not interested."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
There is not voting, there is Lib. There were plenty of other options beside Trump. There are some other parties in some states. No one is forced to vote D or R.Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostAt this time, there is only Hillary and Trump.
The problem is that for there to be more options, people would have had to vote for their to be more options in the past. Maybe at some point people will do so, but it will have to be with the realisation that they will fail the first time but are enabling the possibility of success in 4-8 years.
That makes it really really unlikely.
JM
I agree the system promotes two choices, but only because of (general) human nature. The people in the system are ensuring the system continues, and have to accept responsibility for their part in it. (I accept my part of it as well.)
Comment
Comment