Yay, GOP voter suppression is back!

[Kidlicious]

... first the men will piss all over the toilet seats in the unisex restrooms, then this will cause androcide and ...

JM

This

[loinburger]

1. Unisex restrooms. Not a sin. Nice strawman.
2. Voter disenfranchisement. Not a sin. The right to vote is not a God given right. You don't get to be an idiot and rule over others.
3. Women voicing opinions I disagree with. Only a sin depending on what they say. But probably sin.
4. Being Muslim. Seriously? Sin.
5. .... No comment.

If unisex restrooms aren't a sin then why are you up in arms about Houston having unisex restrooms?

And at your other answers

[Kidlicious]

If unisex restrooms aren't a sin then why are you up in arms about Houston having unisex restrooms?

And at your other answers

Because you are up in arms about your right to vote for this crap because you think men are oppressed for not being allowed to pee on the seat in the women's room.

[loinburger]

So you're secretly in favor of unisex restrooms, and have just been playing devil's advocate? I'm impressed, I honestly didn't think you were clever enough for that

[Kidlicious]

I've been to countries where that is part of their culture. I'm fine with that. It's not part of the liberal agenda.

[kentonio]

You are on good troll form today old man. I salute you.

[Kidlicious]

Wait until Wendy Davis gets rejected by the voters. Then you can say not enough people without drivers licenses got to vote.

[Sava]

With any luck I'll trigger the Apocalypse.

with any luck, you'll trigger some MRA's and they'll kill themselves

[Ben Kenobi]

What the hell are you talking about? Nobody gives a **** about some random mayor's antics unless they're at Rob Ford levels of awfulness and/or awesomeness

Actually, you're wrong here. Annise Parker has gone full Ford. You never go full Ford.

[Ben Kenobi]

We can't have such barriers for some (who already vote less than the average) and not such barriers for others.

The problem is, how do you prove that a person is who they say they are and that they are legally permitted to vote? This is important. In order to keep elections fair and free- people need to hold up their end of the bargain by providing sufficient photo identification.

If people are no longer required to provide identification then fraud is irresistible. It becomes possible for people to vote as many times as they are able and deprives others of the franchise.

You're concerned about people being turned away, sure, but what about the people who's votes are disenfranchised by someone who isn't eligible to vote?

[kentonio]

Except that it happens so rarely that it's statistically irrelevant. There have been countless Republican investigators who have tried to prove there's this mass fraud going on, and every single one has failed miserably. It's a myth that's used to try and justify disenfranchising millions of legitimate voters.

[Ben Kenobi]

Except that it happens so rarely that it's statistically irrelevant.

It's impossible to detect without sufficient countermeasures.

There have been countless Republican investigators who have tried to prove there's this mass fraud going on

The system as it is, with a secret ballot and no requirement for identification makes fraud impossible to prove.

It's a myth that's used to try and justify disenfranchising millions of legitimate voters.

How is requiring everyone to obtain photo identification disenfranchising them? Are you suggesting that people are too lazy to take a day to go and get it?

[Proteus_MST]

You wouldn´t have the problem with double registered voters, if you would introduce a mandatory national ID-card, as almost all other modern democracies have
(at least mandatory if you want to perform things like participate in elections, or for doing administrative formalities)

[Ben Kenobi]

You wouldn´t have the problem with double registered voters, if you would introduce a mandatory national ID-card, as almost all other modern democracies have

In the same countries that still don't require photo id for voting?

[loinburger]

You wouldn´t have the problem with double registered voters, if you would introduce a mandatory national ID-card, as almost all other modern democracies have
(at least mandatory if you want to perform things like participate in elections, or for doing administrative formalities)

A national ID card? I believe you mean The Mark Of The Beast™