Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NRA announce that lead poisoning is an evil liberal myth

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I am having my house painted later this year; one of the fees is because of "lead paint remediation", because there is still paint containing lead on it.
    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
      Must be a lot of dead condors, then.
      Indeed. Lead shot was one of the prime problems which almost drove the California Condor into extinction.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #33
        Per above, I thought that was one of the reasons to (justifiably) switch to unleaded gasoline.
        No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View Post
          in this instance he has a better grasp of the concept of likely routes of entry into wildlife species than "OMFG 3000 tons of lead" Kentonio.
          How typically stupid of you. Yes we spent decades pouring lead into the atmosphere which did untold damage to basically every living thing on the planet, but eventually we came to the realization that 'duh, poisoning the air we all breathe probably isn't such a hot idea!'. It takes a special type of ****ing ****** to then argue that we should continue to pour completely unnecessary amounts of toxic metal into nature because it probably wont kill as much stuff as the original much bigger problem did and continues to do.

          Comment


          • #35
            adding an additional 3000 tons
            Assuming equal distribution across America,

            9,629,091 square kms.

            That's roughly 3.12 x 10^(-5) tons per square kilometre

            1 ton = .907 tonnes so that's 2.85 x 10^(-5) tonnes per square kilometre.

            Tonne = 1k kg = 2.85 x 10 ^(-2) Kg per square km., or 28.5 g per square km The average bullet is 115 g.

            So, on average you'd have 1/4th of a bullet per square kilometre. Or .636 bullets per square mile. Which equals a bullet every 1.26 square miles.
            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

            Comment


            • #36
              The US produces about 400k tons of lead every year, and has a 40+ year reserve, so we'd be looking at total proven reserves of 16 million tons of Lead. Given 300 vs 16 million, that gives us a ratio of 1.8 x 10^(-5) of proven existing lead reserves in the United States vs. Bullets.
              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                Assuming equal distribution across America,
                DERP
                Yes let's assume the bullets are equally distributed throughout the country from Alaska to California
                Incidentally I don't think Alaska is considering such legislation.

                9,629,091 square kms.

                That's roughly 3.12 x 10^(-5) tons per square kilometre
                3000/9629091 = 3.12*10^-4
                You're already off to a great start

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                  takes a special type of ****ing ****** to then argue that we should continue to pour completely unnecessary amounts of toxic metal into nature because it probably wont kill as much stuff as the original much bigger problem did and continues to do.
                  It takes a special kind of ****** not to realize that the 3000 tons of lead were in solid form in nature to begin with. Returning in solid form to nature with no readily viable pathway into the ingestion of the wildlife seems rather benign considering the more likely avenues of introduction into species.
                  Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe; August 6, 2013, 15:04.
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                    How typically stupid of you. Yes we spent decades pouring lead into the atmosphere which did untold damage to basically every living thing on the planet, but eventually we came to the realization that 'duh, poisoning the air we all breathe probably isn't such a hot idea!'. It takes a special type of ****ing ****** to then argue that we should continue to pour completely unnecessary amounts of toxic metal into nature because it probably wont kill as much stuff as the original much bigger problem did and continues to do.
                    You're actually retarded aren't you.

                    A bit of lead in a berm is vastly different from leaded gasoline. Location and vector are everything. The reason lead shot was a problem has nothing at all to do with poisoning of the water, or the ground, or anything, it's because birds actually ate the lead pellets. The lead getting into the environment or whatever is a complete non-issue. Before it got made into bullets it was sitting in the ground as big hunks of lead in the first place.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Well, galena, actually. :\
                      No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Yeah and unless you got some strong acids, it isn't readily going into solution in either form.


                        edit- which could have been a contributing cause to the presence of Pb in birds years back when acid rain was much more prevalent.
                        Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe; August 6, 2013, 15:25.
                        "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                        “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                          A bit of lead in a berm is vastly different from leaded gasoline. Location and vector are everything. The reason lead shot was a problem has nothing at all to do with poisoning of the water, or the ground, or anything, it's because birds actually ate the lead pellets. The lead getting into the environment or whatever is a complete non-issue. Before it got made into bullets it was sitting in the ground as big hunks of lead in the first place.
                          Of course its about working its way into the animals food chain you dip****, which happens with frequency when it ends up either being eaten directly or with fragments in animals that were shot but not outright killed then being eaten by predators, which happens a lot to weakened injured animals. The quantities being put out are relevant because they increase the likelihood of it entering the food system.

                          Stop with the gasoline strawman already, it was brought up by as strawman and has been nothing else since. It's a pathetic way to claim this isn't bad because it's not as bad.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                            Given 300 vs 16 million, that gives us a ratio of 1.8 x 10^(-5) of proven existing lead reserves in the United States vs. Bullets.
                            Setting aside the ridiculousness of what else you said (as Gribbler has already dealt with it nicely), how did you go from 3000 to 300?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                              The quantities being put out are relevant because they increase the likelihood of it entering the food system.
                              In fact they don't. That portion of ammunition used in hunting (that you make claim may if the situation is just right and the stars align enters the food chain) has been on the decline. Ammunition used in personal self defense a differing matter. Hunting activities for the longest period of time have been on the decline in the US. A recent uptick over the last few years but not nearly what it was in its hey day.
                              Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe; August 6, 2013, 16:09.
                              "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                              “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View Post
                                In fact they don't. Hunting activities for the longest period of time have been on the decline in the US. A recent uptick over the last few years but not nearly what it was in its hey day.
                                Because 20m dead animals a year isn't in any way significant, especially with species like the California Condor which have an estimated 226 animals left in the wild?

                                Same old crap, it's not as bad as it was so we should pretend its not bad at all.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X