Originally posted by KrazyHorse
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are states' rights more important than human lives?
Collapse
X
-
Go read about the wonderful happy safe lives everyone used to live before the evil government started welfare programs.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostDid it? Who built all the schools, all the hospitals? Did the state just cobble them out of thin air? Did FDR build them all?
Maybe you should concentrate on your own life rather than trying to tell other people how to live theirs. Especially when it's a group who spent most of human history being treated like chattel, and have only recently reached a semblance of equality. It tends to make you look a bit of a ***** when you try and turn that clock back.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostTo save the lives of their little girls and boys.
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostSo I'm as with it as Darwin, Marx and Wilde? Cool.
Comment
-
No, I think you're trying to **** the poor, because every political position you've taken in the last year has involved trying to **** the poor.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostYou're an idiot, kentonio. You don't actually understand the meaning of "cost" and "benefit", which is why you believe that when I suggest we analyze the cost and benefit you think I am trying to **** the poor.
Comment
-
That's one element of how wrong the statement was...Originally posted by kentonio View PostI presume you're counting emergency room access as healthcare?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
-
That's also debatable. Health care pricing, especially by hospitals, is extremely opaque. Cost billed for emergency room visits may or may not have much to do with actual cost to the hospital of providing that service. Mostly this opacity is driven by the the interaction of insurance and government payment rules.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
I'm not talking about the direct costs, but rather a) the frequency of severe ailments that could have been cheaply avoided with preventative care and b) the knock on costs related to lost employment etc due to a).Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostThat's also debatable. Health care pricing, especially by hospitals, is extremely opaque. Cost billed for emergency room visits may or may not have much to do with actual cost to the hospital of providing that service. Mostly this opacity is driven by the the interaction of insurance and government payment rules.
Comment
-
I've heard this before, but I don't believe a pound of government prevention is worth an ounce of private sector cure.Originally posted by Krill View PostThough providing healthcare in the community is generally cheaper than providing it in hospital settings (ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure etc)
Comment
-
*shrug* It doesn't matter if it's government or private sector: getting healthcare when the person first becomes ill is generally cheaper than allowing the illness to progress and potentially requiring a hospital admission. Nor does it really matter what you believe, FWIW.You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.
Comment
-
In the zombie apocalypse, we won't be able to take chances.Originally posted by Dauphin View PostKilling a patient when they first become ill is cheaper still."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
){ :|:& };:
Comment