Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Christianity ruins families.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1. first: proven; second: not
    2. you wouldn't think of banning smoking everywhere

    SUMMARY : again you are proven to be a lying scumbag.
    "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

    Comment


    • I guess the answer to my question is NO. As expected.
      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • 1. first: proven; second: not
        Not the question.

        How is one intolerant but the other is not? They are both factual arguments.

        to be a lying scumbag.
        So I'm a scumbag for saying that having sex with other men is bad for you, but I'm not a scumbag for saying that smoking is also bad for you?

        I would be wrong, if that were the case. Scumbag wouldn't enter the picture.
        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

        Comment


        • I guess the answer to my question is NO. As expected.
          I'm trying to understand what you regard as intolerant. That's why I asked you the question.

          What is the difference between the two positions?
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • You really don't understand. It's almost sad.
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • No I don't.

              Which is why I also asked Elok the question. How would I express my opinion in a manner that would be considered tolerant to you?

              This is a honest question, to both you and Elok.

              You both seem to say that it is how I'm expressing myself that makes the difference.

              So, show me. What should I be saying in order to be considered tolerant?
              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

              Comment


              • There is no way that you can say things like gays shouldn't be treated like everyone else without sounding intolerant. Hence you will never be considered tolerant. That's your right, but don't expect people here to praise you or agree with you.
                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                Comment


                • There is no way that you can say things like gays shouldn't be treated like everyone else without sounding intolerant. Hence you will never be considered tolerant. That's your right, but don't expect people here to praise you or agree with you.
                  Ok, not quite there yet, rah.

                  You're still criticising what I say, without providing a positive answer to my question.

                  Are you saying that I should say that we should treat gay people exactly the same as everyone else?

                  Why don't you spit out what this means wrt policy?
                  Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                  "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                  2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                    Fun's equating his current situation with the holocaust. Par for the course.
                    Distorting a person's argument once again. It comes naturally for you.
                    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                    Comment


                    • Arguing the exact wording is one of the reasons you come off as a bigoted ass.
                      You asked, I answered. You're allowed your opinion. Everyone else here is allowed also.
                      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • Mr. Fun:

                        You've Godwined the thread. Expect criticisms for hyperbole when you do that.
                        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                        Comment


                        • Arguing the exact wording is one of the reasons you come off as a bigoted ass.
                          So asking for clarification of your position makes me come off like an ass?

                          I don't think it's a distortion for me to say that you believe that everyone should be treated equally, including gay people.

                          Correct?

                          You believe that gay people should be allowed to marry and that they should be allowed to adopt, because to do so otherwise would be discrimination, correct?

                          You believe that everyone who says that they should not be permitted to marry and should not be allowed to adopt is intolerant?

                          Your rationale is because you believe that in order for people to be truly equal, people should be able to marry whomever they love.

                          Is all this correct?
                          Last edited by Ben Kenobi; June 28, 2010, 12:37.
                          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                          Comment


                          • BK, if you said that you thought male homosexuality was bad once a year, or once a month, a lot less people would be considering you intolerant.

                            There are people who are not in favor of gay marriage and aren't intolerant (I think the tolerance argument for gay marriage is terrible).

                            JM
                            Jon Miller-
                            I AM.CANADIAN
                            GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                            Comment


                            • if you said that you thought male homosexuality was bad once a year, or once a month, a lot less people would be considering you intolerant.
                              So if I sat down and stayed quiet in the corner and kept my mouth shut it would make a difference?

                              Have I understood you correctly?
                              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                              Comment


                              • I don't care about "tolerant," that's Rah's bag. I'm dismayed by the lack of intellectual honesty. You give obviously false, outdated or biased sources to back up your claims and even then fib about what they establish, make extravagant and often-ludicrous claims about all sorts of topics, ignore arguments to the contrary (sometimes digging through 500-word post for a few lines you can respond to), repeat arguments debunked in previous threads, distort your opponents' positions without shame, and play martyr when called out on any of it.

                                Which is why I generally don't bother arguing with you any more.
                                1011 1100
                                Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X