The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Because they are public property, and won't be renewed. It therefore makes sense to maximise the return to the public from them, without actually driving away those who want to extract them.
And that's why the rights to them are auctioned. So why do you want the tax, again?
I took no offense and make no apologies for the industry I am in. Personally however about 90% of my time is related to natural gas projects. While not impact fee, they have lesser emissions and "spills" (for most) are impossible.
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
The Mazda 3 is actually a nice little car but it's biggest problem is it has a gutless motor. I imagine it makes a nice daily commuter though.
Gutless motor? WTF?
It's a 160hp engine and only 2600lbs.
It's also got a perfect power curve, unlike the Matrix/Vibe and Civic.
Stupid Oerdin.
What do you drive, Oerdin?
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Because they are public property, and won't be renewed. It therefore makes sense to maximise the return to the public from them, without actually driving away those who want to extract them.
All countries around the world adopt this approach with non-renewables.
Governments charge royalties which is the "economic rent" for the use of a government owned resource. These are usual but I took your earlier post to be advocavting some additional tax for non-renewability?
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Governments charge royalties which is the "economic rent" for the use of a government owned resource. These are usual but I took your earlier post to be advocavting some additional tax for non-renewability?
Yes, royalties are what I'm talking about, but I'm using the blanket term tax. (Australia is in the middle of a heated debate about a proposal to replace royalties with a "resource super profits tax".)
And that's why the rights to them are auctioned. So why do you want the tax, again?
We don't auction them here (at least I've never heard of such a process here) and we would be mad to given that the life of a mine can be decades long. Unless the rights were auctioned in terms of a percentage cut. Is that the way they're auctioned in the US?
Comment