Suck it, Ben.

[Asher]

Please feel free to pm him the pictures.

He's claiming to have pictures of the warning signs, I'm not sure why they're inappropriate?

Isn't the point of the warning signs to NOT be graphic? And further, any shots of the warning signs should NOT have any graphic content in them because they are WARNINGS for the graphic content which is AHEAD?

[Asher]

I was speaking of recruiting as in getting people to join the club, which is what the pornography GLASS distributed was doing.

They didn't distribute -- it was on a poster.
And it wasn't a Club day poster for club recruitment, it was posters for celebrating our diversity (eg, pushing an ideology).

Same ****ing situation, Ben.

[rah]

Agreed, if they are just warning signs with no inappropriate content, those may be posted here.

[Ben Kenobi]

Ok, I have pictures with the warning signs in with the display, which is why I can't post them.

But the latest one is just a close up of the warning sign in 2008.

[Asher]

Agreed, if they are just warning signs with no inappropriate content, those may be posted here.

Ben sent me links to two images. NEITHER OF WHICH SHOW THE SUPPOSED WARNING SIGNS.

The first one shows students protesting the GAP protest using their own signs to try to block the view of the signs (which are out of focus and in the back here, but still somewhat visible): http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/imag.../proaborts.jpg

The other picture is of the warning sign the UNIVERSITY posted this year which is why the students got served with trespass notice:


This is NOT the sign that the GAP people put up, because the GAP PEOPLE NEVER PUT UP WARNING SIGNS. The university ITSELF put this warning sign up IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY OTHER WARNING SIGNS, and it served only as a warning of TRESPASS so the GAP people could be charged with trespass.

You have again shown yourself to be a despicable liar, Ben.

[Ben Kenobi]

Here's another one, from 2006.

Now you are telling me you saw the signs without seeing the warning signs?

[Ben Kenobi]

Here's an image from Calgary in 2003, of a defaced sign, put up by the campus prolife.

[Asher]

Here's another one, from 2006.

Now you are telling me you saw the signs without seeing the warning signs?

This was put up by the SU. Again. I already discussed this.

There were no warning signs put up by the GAP, so the SU made their own.

[Asher]

Here's an image from Calgary in 2003, of a defaced sign, put up by the campus prolife.

Never seen that before in my life, and there's certainly no indication that's from Calgary -- where did you get it?

[Ben Kenobi]

From the CCBR report for Calgary going back through 2003.

[Asher]

From the CCBR report for Calgary going back through 2003.

Link?`

[Ben Kenobi]

That, sir you will have to pay for if you want to receive their newsletters.

I have lots of stuff that isn't publicly available.

[Cort Haus]

By posting a photo of a university sign and passing it off as the work of his pals, BK is proving, as if there was any doubt, that he is either (a) stupid, (b) a liar, (c) a wind-up, or (d) all of the above.

Take your pick. :shrug:

[Asher]

That, sir you will have to pay for if you want to receive their newsletters.

I have lots of stuff that isn't publicly available.

You are such a pathetic human being.

So your first two photos demonstrating the GAP putting up warning signs were warning signs put up by the University itself or put up by the Student Union itself. Then you post a third picture of a generic sign, with no possible way to determine where it was posted (and I've never seen it before, guarantee it was not in Calgary). Then when given an opportunity to prove it's from a reliable source, you reply with this garbage?

Pathetic.

Why would the university and the student unions need to put their own warning signs up if the GAP signs existed, Ben?

[Cort Haus]

Instead of banning Ben, can we abort him?

Making virtually the same joke twice in one thread should be a bannable offence imo.