I wouldn't GM someone to be psychologically "normal." Your suggestion that we screen people for "ungoodthink" is dystopian.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
17 year old girls murder friend to find out what it is like
Collapse
X
-
The "psychopath" part is certainly part of what I'm suggesting. (Sociopath may or may not have genetic links. Again, why study is a good thing.) The "mentally retarded" I threw in there as another "psychological" defect since you said you wouldn't GM someone to be psychologically "normal".
Comment
-
You DanS'd me... so to your second sentence:
It has everything to do with our discussion, and especially your name calling. If you want to try to portray my position as "x"ist or whatever, I just want to see whether you're intellectually honest enough to put yourself in the same (poorly labelled) category if you support similar actions.
Comment
-
Aeson, you should know that Kuci is a kind-of atheist to and just said burn in hell just for the fun of it... He acts right wing because it would be boring for him to act left-wing on these forums because the left always "wins"....
It because there is more left people here. To be fair om forums where there is some-what more right-wing people the right wing always "wins" to. The only time this does not happend is if the OP is over the top or something...
It totally sucks what happened.However, it is a drop in a bucket and should not change our minds about making poltical chocies...
What does DanS'd mean?“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
Comment
-
There might be some bioethic issues around this but the techonlogy is just not there yet for it to be relevant for today. Kuci is talking about today. Socity as we have it today can not go on. It will change massively one way or another in 200 or so years.“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson
Then why is he always trying to convert me to some whacko-christian sect?
This is wrong.“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson
Sure, just so long as you also allow for a hypothetical perfectly secure and efficient prison, perfectly accurate psychological diagnosis/rehabilitation, and/or perfect medical research facilities/funding/staff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
kind-of?
/not atheist
Aeson is not being stupied. He just did not know about you because he does not come here a lot.
Also, Join the Civ4 demo game. w00t!“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson
It has everything to do with our discussion, and especially your name calling.
name calling? Wow, you have a thin skin if a negative characterization of your position counts as "name calling." Commie.
If you want to try to portray my position as "x"ist or whatever, I just want to see whether you're intellectually honest enough to put yourself in the same (poorly labelled) category if you support similar actions.
I certainly don't support screening people for ungoodthink.
Comment
Comment