Canada's Ruling Liberals Fall in Polls, MP Quits
Tue Feb 17, 2:42 PM ET
By David Ljunggren
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's ruling Liberals suffered more aftershocks from a financial scandal on Tuesday when a poll showed their public support had sunk to a 12-year low and a veteran legislator quit the party, saying he had lost confidence in Prime Minister Paul Martin.
Ottawa has been in turmoil since a report last week showed C$100 million ($76 million) in funds designed to promote national unity in French-speaking Quebec had gone instead to advertising firms with close Liberal ties, prompting questions about who knew what and who should take the blame.
The Ipsos-Reid poll for the Globe and Mail newspaper and CTV Television showed support for Liberals fell to 35 percent, down from 39 percent just after the report was released last Tuesday and 48 percent in January.
The last time the Liberals recorded 35 percent public support was in January 1992, when they were in opposition.
Support for the opposition Conservatives rose to 27 percent from 24 percent last week and 19 percent last month. Backing for the left-leaning New Democrats fell to 17 percent from 18 percent last week, compared with 16 percent last month.
Martin, who took power last December, has so far declined to say whether he will put off an election, which aides had earlier tipped for May 10.
The new poll indicates that if the Liberals went for a May vote, they would be returned with a minority government.
Martin has called an inquiry into the scandal, which took place from 1997 to 2001 when he was finance minister under former prime minister and arch-rival Jean Chretien. He has promised to quit if the inquiry shows he was implicated.
The Liberals suffered another blow when legislator John Bryden said he had quit the party and was considering whether to join the Conservatives.
Bryden, 60, said he was not sure the public felt it could trust the Liberals any more and said Martin had badly mishandled the scandal by trying to blame Chretien.
"I have lost confidence in Mr. Martin because he has caused problems inside the Liberal Party," he told a news conference, saying morale in the party was low.
A senior aide to Martin said the prime minister had to balance the need for Canadians to learn more about the scandal with the need to seek a new mandate from the voters.
"If we get it right, the results will speak for themselves. If we get it wrong, the results will still speak for themselves," the aide told Reuters.
The poll showed that 65 percent of voters felt the election should not be held until the inquiry was complete.
"When you get down in the territory of 35 percent, you don't win majorities," Ipsos-Reid president Darrell Bricker told the Globe and Mail.
"I don't think there is anybody now who would be seriously advising (Martin) to go to the polls on this basis, unless he just wants to completely roll the dice."
There are no fixed election dates in Canada and Martin can call a vote when the chances of victory look good. The last possible date for a vote is November 2005.
The Ipsos-Reid poll surveyed 1,055 Canadians from Wednesday to Sunday and is considered accurate to within 3.1 percentage points 19 times out of 20.
.................................................. .....................................
That's an 8 point gap between the Martinite Liberals and a Conservative party without a leader.
Concievably, that gap could be as little as 5 points.
What could change between then and May?
Tue Feb 17, 2:42 PM ET
By David Ljunggren
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's ruling Liberals suffered more aftershocks from a financial scandal on Tuesday when a poll showed their public support had sunk to a 12-year low and a veteran legislator quit the party, saying he had lost confidence in Prime Minister Paul Martin.
Ottawa has been in turmoil since a report last week showed C$100 million ($76 million) in funds designed to promote national unity in French-speaking Quebec had gone instead to advertising firms with close Liberal ties, prompting questions about who knew what and who should take the blame.
The Ipsos-Reid poll for the Globe and Mail newspaper and CTV Television showed support for Liberals fell to 35 percent, down from 39 percent just after the report was released last Tuesday and 48 percent in January.
The last time the Liberals recorded 35 percent public support was in January 1992, when they were in opposition.
Support for the opposition Conservatives rose to 27 percent from 24 percent last week and 19 percent last month. Backing for the left-leaning New Democrats fell to 17 percent from 18 percent last week, compared with 16 percent last month.
Martin, who took power last December, has so far declined to say whether he will put off an election, which aides had earlier tipped for May 10.
The new poll indicates that if the Liberals went for a May vote, they would be returned with a minority government.
Martin has called an inquiry into the scandal, which took place from 1997 to 2001 when he was finance minister under former prime minister and arch-rival Jean Chretien. He has promised to quit if the inquiry shows he was implicated.
The Liberals suffered another blow when legislator John Bryden said he had quit the party and was considering whether to join the Conservatives.
Bryden, 60, said he was not sure the public felt it could trust the Liberals any more and said Martin had badly mishandled the scandal by trying to blame Chretien.
"I have lost confidence in Mr. Martin because he has caused problems inside the Liberal Party," he told a news conference, saying morale in the party was low.
A senior aide to Martin said the prime minister had to balance the need for Canadians to learn more about the scandal with the need to seek a new mandate from the voters.
"If we get it right, the results will speak for themselves. If we get it wrong, the results will still speak for themselves," the aide told Reuters.
The poll showed that 65 percent of voters felt the election should not be held until the inquiry was complete.
"When you get down in the territory of 35 percent, you don't win majorities," Ipsos-Reid president Darrell Bricker told the Globe and Mail.
"I don't think there is anybody now who would be seriously advising (Martin) to go to the polls on this basis, unless he just wants to completely roll the dice."
There are no fixed election dates in Canada and Martin can call a vote when the chances of victory look good. The last possible date for a vote is November 2005.
The Ipsos-Reid poll surveyed 1,055 Canadians from Wednesday to Sunday and is considered accurate to within 3.1 percentage points 19 times out of 20.
.................................................. .....................................
That's an 8 point gap between the Martinite Liberals and a Conservative party without a leader.
Concievably, that gap could be as little as 5 points.
What could change between then and May?
Comment