Couple quick points to rebut:
1. You may have killed Christ, but Christ defeated death by rising from the dead.
So what have you accomplished, except for establishing the righteousness of all those who believe in Christ?
Secondly we refer to God the Father to distiguish from the person of Jesus, begotton of the Father before all worlds. This represents the relationship between the Father, God, and the Son Jesus, though both are still God.
St. Leo, God occupies the Universe, though he can also exist outside of his creation. Therefore, no house can ever completely encompass God. A better figure of speech may be that God gets to do what he wants with what he makes.
Menlas
Good point. However, the interpretation of the hebrew word day used in the passage alluded to may also pertain to eon rather than a single day. Therefore, the fault lies not in scripture, but in the interpretation of scripture.
Are there anymore gross inaccuracies in the Bible?
1. You may have killed Christ, but Christ defeated death by rising from the dead.
So what have you accomplished, except for establishing the righteousness of all those who believe in Christ?

Secondly we refer to God the Father to distiguish from the person of Jesus, begotton of the Father before all worlds. This represents the relationship between the Father, God, and the Son Jesus, though both are still God.
Whose house does God occupy? UberGod's? Whose house does UberGod occupy?
Menlas
In fact, I'd rather say that the Bible is a proof of the christian God's non-existence, because we know that some facts in it are not correct (Man wasn't created in 1 day, except for some american fanatics ).
How could the Bible be wrong if it represents God's words ?
How could the Bible be wrong if it represents God's words ?
Are there anymore gross inaccuracies in the Bible?
Comment