It was obvious that Brady was VERY RUSTY after missing 52 weeks of football. For the first 2 and half quarters, he looked like a guy who hadn't played in a while. But when the chips were down, he started getting into the swing of things and started looking like Brady of old. I don't see the "serious problem", I see a QB who is only going to play more consistently in the future.
And you can harp all you want about the fumble... and use it as "proof", but only a moron would do so. First, it was an excellent strip play by NE. The guy just didn't drop the ball, it was knocked out by a good play... something they practice all the time. But more importantly, turnovers, kick off returns, bad calls by the officials, missed calls by the officials, defensive lapses, stupid decisions, and whatever are all part of the game, and whether they happen early or late, THEY HAPPEN.
What is important is the score at the end of the game... period! Brady led the team to two touchdowns when the chips were down... For you to say he doesn't deserve credit because they needed a fumble to get the ball again is moronic at best.
While the rest of the world gives credit where credit is due to Brady... only an idiot would ignore his excellent play in the closing drives
Comment