Tweet
The Pentagon will likely filibuster the transfer of bunkerbusters unless no robuster solution can be found.
-
" -
They haven't received the jets yet. I am sure the next stuff will be munitions for the jets but it doesn't seem Russia will do much. There are good reasons for that.Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Interesting word replacement happening there.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Interesting video
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
That could so easily be an advert for the next Call of Duty: Modern Warfare.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
Russia has already defeated any possible Ukrainian offensive:Originally posted by BlackCat View PostInteresting video
Also in the article:
Probably doesn't want to admit that Ukraine will collapse in 3 days now.Ukraine’s defence minister, Oleksiy Reznikov, posted a message on Twitter on Sunday, quoting from the Depeche Mode song Enjoy the Silence. “Words are very unnecessary They can only do harm,” the tweet said.
BlahComment
-
It looks like APN has been busy - 2 videos in ten days
Well, he claims that Comical Ali has evolved into Comical Russia (and a couple of other funnies) here :
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Is he a debuster?
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
I hope that the Ukrainian counteroffensive goes gangbusters.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
I skipped ahead a few times and watched the last ~25 minutes. He insists Russia keeps backing down from red lines. Doesn't this war prove otherwise? The guy wants to escalate the war enough to get Russia to give up or something. I didn't watch it all so I dont know who will be the foot soldiers for this escalation or how he defines victory. Does it mean militarily taking Crimea and the Donbas? I think the people living there should decide their future, not the people attacking them for 8 years.Originally posted by Dinner View Post
That would indeed be a strategic defeat for Russia, but it aint gonna happen. Russia will take more of the Donbas and perhaps Odesa and a land bridge eastward. When Ukraine's military runs low on bodies for the meat grinder Russia will take even more ground followed by regime change. No way will Putin let Nato stay in control to continue proxy wars.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ah, so you agree that the ukrainians should have the right to return to Ukraine instead of being occupied by russian forces.Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
So by this definition you would have supported the Confederacy in the US Civil war?Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
What does sovereignty mean to you? Do borders matter?
Is their a purpose to any international rules?
What exactly does your thought process mean?
Do you support Taiwan unilaterally declaring independence?
What about Quebec?
Where exactly do you draw a line?
Or, do you?"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
They wont be returning to Ukraine, Kiev torched that bridge in 2014. But yes, if they wanted that it should be up to them.Originally posted by BlackCat View PostComment
-
My 'definition' is about the victims of an 8 year war getting to vote for their freedom and you're comparing them to slave owners? Slavery was not self determination so no, I wouldn't support the south. Your analogy would be better if northern states seceded rather than help perpetuate slavery and they got attacked by the south. That would at least compare the slave owners to the puppet masters feeding Ukrainians to the war machine.Originally posted by PLATO View Post
The individual is sovereign and we all have borders. I'm American, the only international rule we have is do what we say. In that phone call with Pyatt and Nuland before the coup when she chose Ukraine's next leader she said f the EU or something to that effect. What international rule says the USA can pick Ukraine's next leader? Or invade Iraq over phony WMD. What international rule says massacring cops and protesters to get rid of sitting leaders has the world's approval? My thought process: the people of the Donbas did not attack Kiev, they protested the coup and Kiev attacked them. Yes and yes... and Tibet. I draw lines where I see right and wrong.Comment
Comment