Russia's being accused of blowing up a dam that will result in crop failures in territory they control, so why wouldn't Russia blow the dams under Ukrainian control? 
							
						
					Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
There were reports of Russia packing that dam with explosives last august.I am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
That was 3 months before Russia retreated from Kherson and started building a new fortified front on the east side of the river. Maybe the dam was a back up plan if Ukraine attacked east from Kherson. Thats about the only motive I can see but it fails too, there was no Ukrainian advance to flood.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Only if they forcibly take them back to Russia.Originally posted by Berzerker View Postif Russia rescued flood victims they'd be accused of a war crime
They could also stop trying to shell rescue efforts if they are that worried about being accused of war crimes
							
						Indifference is Bliss
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Uhhhhh... where is the Donbas... oh, that's right, it's in UKRAINEOriginally posted by Berzerker View Post
Nazis invaded the Donbas for 8 years with US support and Russia defended the victims
Once again, if Texans treat Mexicans in Texas bad, does that give Mexico the right to INVADE Texas?
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Putin knows he is likely to lose that occupied territory so he is wrecking it to make things more difficult for Ukraine.Originally posted by Berzerker View PostRussia's being accused of blowing up a dam that will result in crop failures in territory they control, so why wouldn't Russia blow the dams under Ukrainian control?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Yeah, there was a Russian video that showed up ~2 days ago.Originally posted by BeBMan View PostAcc. to the Oryx website Russian tank losses have crossed the 2000er mark. Otoh there's also now one entry for a Leopard 2A4 loss on the Ukrainian side.
Incidentally, amazing op-sec on Ukraine's side for this counterattack. So far, pretty much everything combat-related is from Russian sources, and in a couple of cases even led to Ukrainian strikes since the videos' locations could be readily identified.Indifference is Bliss
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
They are not being accused of using Ukrainian crop failures as a motive for blowing up the dam.Originally posted by Berzerker View PostRussia's being accused of blowing up a dam that will result in crop failures in territory they control, so why wouldn't Russia blow the dams under Ukrainian control?
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Where are they supposed to take them? Thats where the safety and resources are, Russia already took in hundreds of thousands of refugees from our proxy war. I believe about 3 million people fled the region and most went east to Russia or north/south within eastern Ukraine. This war is happening in a region largely populated by ethnic Russians, ask them if Azov is their friend.Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
Only if they forcibly take them back to Russia.
They could also stop trying to shell rescue efforts if they are that worried about being accused of war crimes
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I dont want my taxes and govt arming Nazis to kill people in Ukraine, I dont care what side of a line the victims are on. If there was an anti-Mexican coup in Washington and they sent a right wing army to kill Mexican-Americans in the SW Mexico would have the right to defend the victims.Originally posted by Ming View Post
Uhhhhh... where is the Donbas... oh, that's right, it's in UKRAINE
Once again, if Texans treat Mexicans in Texas bad, does that give Mexico the right to INVADE Texas?
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Crimea will be hardest hit by the loss of water and Russia wont be losing that part of the country, Kherson will be taken in spite of the delay caused by the flood.Originally posted by Dinner View Post
Putin knows he is likely to lose that occupied territory so he is wrecking it to make things more difficult for Ukraine.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Russia is supposed to leave Ukraine and let the people go where they want. Perhaps, even rebuild their homes.Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
Where are they supposed to take them? Thats where the safety and resources are, Russia already took in hundreds of thousands of refugees from our proxy war. I believe about 3 million people fled the region and most went east to Russia or north/south within eastern Ukraine. This war is happening in a region largely populated by ethnic Russians, ask them if Azov is their friend.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
- Likes 1
 
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I'd say that the flooded area was the hardest hit... After all Crimea managed fine both before the canal was built and after it was shut off once Russia illegally annexed Crimea.Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
Crimea will be hardest hit by the loss of water and Russia wont be losing that part of the country, Kherson will be taken in spite of the delay caused by the flood.
Or would you rather have your house flooded than your tap water turned off?Indifference is Bliss
Comment
 
Comment