The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who do you tip to win the US presidential election
And as I've repeated over and over, that recommendation is based on a study in which patients were given lethal doses.
You haven't disputed that they were given lethal doses. You just keep appealing to authority.
No... I keep pointing out the SCIENTIFIC PROPERLY DONE STUDIES... ALL OF WHICH say it doesn't work.
You keep pointing out all the NON SCIENTIFIC and IMPROPERLY DONE STUDIES that say it work.
No... I keep pointing out the SCIENTIFIC PROPERLY DONE STUDIES... ALL OF WHICH say it doesn't work.
You keep pointing out all the NON SCIENTIFIC and IMPROPERLY DONE STUDIES that say it work.
No. You're a pitiful hack.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Gee... I'm not the one that keeps trying to make a point by posting non conclusive, poorly done, non-scientific studies as support.
Only hacks do that.
My site, My rules... deal with it or post your crap somewhere else.
It's that simple.
Yeah. I understand that you get to be Big Brother. Again, you don't address what I'm saying. Everyone that's read 1984 knows that Big Brother never won an argument and was nothing but a hack.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Gee... I'm not the one that keeps trying to make a point by posting non conclusive, poorly done, non-scientific studies as support.
Only hacks do that.
No. I said that the studies that you claim are conclusive aren't conclusive at all. You're making a debunked claim over and over.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Kamala Harris' Favorability Rating Higher Than Trump, Pence and Biden's
California Senator Kamala Harris has a higher net favorability rating than President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, according to a new poll.
According to the survey conducted by ABC News/Ipsos, Harris received a net favorability rating of positive four, as 35 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of her, compared with 31 percent that had an unfavorable one.
The poll shows Biden received a slightly lower net favorability rating of negative three: 40 percent favorable and 43 percent unfavorable.
In comparison, the poll found Trump and Pence received much lower net favorability ratings. Respondents gave Pence a negative 14 net favorability rating, as 31 percent said they had a favorable opinion of the vice president while 45 percent said the opposite.
The poll found Trump received the lowest net favorability rating, negative 23, as 58 percent said they had an unfavorable opinion and 35 percent said they had a favorable one.
The poll surveyed 1,044 U.S. adults from August 11 to 12 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.3 percentage points.
Yeah. I understand that you get to be Big Brother. Again, you don't address what I'm saying. Everyone that's read 1984 knows that Big Brother never won an argument and was nothing but a hack.
Oh... but I am addressing what you are saying. It was an obvious troll thread and a piece of crap. So I treated it like it deserved.
And I will continue to delete crap when I see. And as far as 1984, you are welcome to your opinion.
But in the end, my site and my rules. If you don't like it... TOUGH
You are free to post your crap at some other site.
No. I said that the studies that you claim are conclusive aren't conclusive at all. You're making a debunked claim over and over.
Gee... I post results from properly done scientific studies. And you post results from debunked not properly done non scientific studies.
And that is a fact. I'm not saying that they are "conclusive"... just results from actual REAL well done stories that support my opinion.
You on the other hand do just the opposite by finding debunked studies to support your opinion
I'll leave it to the posters to make up their own minds
And I said, over and over again, that they gave people lethal doses etc... You never address that, because you aren't really arguing. You're posting the same thing over and over.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Dude, the only thing out there is a frickin' Press Release from your buddies at AAPS. And even their own PR notes that the "lethal dose" was chloroquine, not hydrocholoroquine. And it was in Brazil. This is seriously the best you can do?
Again, why are "troll" threads deleted? Stupid lie, excuse for deleting. But noone will see the evidence. 1984.
Again, because it seems like you aren't understanding a basic fact here.
I own the site and can do as I wish.
When I see something that I think is total crap, I will delete it.
If you don't like it. Fine by me.
You are free to post that kind of crap at other sites.
And I said, over and over again, that they gave people lethal doses etc... You never address that, because you aren't really arguing. You're posting the same thing over and over.
The results of the PROPERLY DONE SCIENTIFIC studies conclude it doesn't work.
I'm stating a simple FACT.
You keep trying to bring up other debunked studies, and try to change the discussion.
But nothing you can say changes the fact that you have no scientific proof to support your POV
And your approach is... GEE somebody took it and they survived. That PROVES it works.
I prefer REAL, PROPERLY DONE, SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Tweet
Comment