Who do you tip to win the US presidential election

[Lancer]

So please post where any real legitimate source is claiming that Penn will assign it's own electors and ignore the vote.

A new algorithm, you have received and upgrade! Congrats. As an answer, any that you consider "legitimate", I would consider fake news. Any that I post, you would consider not legit. So, decline.

[-Jrabbit]

Seriously, you won't provide a web link to your source? This is not helping your credibility.

[Lancer]

What credibility?

[Lancer]

A single Republican state senator in PA said on Twitter that he wants the state legislature to appoint electors. This would be contrary to current state law, which says that the governor appoints electors, in accordance with the state's popular vote.

Its a start, keep digging.

[Lancer]

A single Republican state senator in PA said on Twitter that he wants the state legislature to appoint electors. This would be contrary to current state law, which says that the governor appoints electors, in accordance with the state's popular vote.

So far so good. Give a little hint. What does the Constitution say on that?

[Ming]

Keep dreaming...

[Ming]

NOBODY has come up and delivered ANY PROOF of the massive fraud that the Trump camp keeps claiming.
So keep posting the fantasy tale that he won.
Posting actual fact isn't being a bot.... posting the drivel coming from the Trump camp.. now that's being a bot

[Lancer]

If you want to know, ya gotta do some leg work.

[Ming]

They have done the leg work and have come up with NADA... There just isn't any out there. He lost, pure and simple

[BeBMan]

Gotta wonder why those Dems allowed for presidents like Reagan, Bush, and Trump at all when they're capable to steal elections at will...

[giblets]

So far so good. Give a little hint. What does the Constitution say on that?

The Constitution says that the states will choose their electors on a date determined by Congress, which has already passed (November 3rd).

[Jon Miller]

And the constitution says that the electors must be chosen in a democratic fashion. Changing the rules after the election, or even right before the election, is not choosing things in a democratic fashion. It is the exact opposite.

One of the most concerning points is that such a large portion of Americans have no desire to live in a Democracy/Republic/Nation of Laws. I understand that in the past this was true towards many minorities, women and the poor. But this is now by the minority which represents 1/3 of the wealth of the US (or less) against the majority based on beliefs and not class, sex or race.

JM

[Uncle Sparky]

Lisa Simpson was right.

[Lancer]

They have done the leg work and have come up with NADA...

Not much legwork really. They just pulled those easy answers on the Constitution out of their sizable posteriors. No correct answers yet, and no extra points for BS political commentary. Focus on the question if you truly seek an answer.

[Lancer]

There is one other path to an outcome which makes every vote, not every ballot, count (besides the one you are completely missing) which nobody is talking about. In 2018 there was passed a law giving extensive powers to the president should there be election issues. A president can choose to bring this to pass and from it gain what I've heard referred to as "extensive powers". That's all I've got on that, haven't looked into it yet. This election happens to have epic issues, whether you think so or not.

[Jon Miller]

When did you become so authoritarian? Allowing presidents to invalidate or cancel presidential elections is obviously unacceptable in any nation that is even just pretending to not be a dictatorship.

JM

[Lancer]

Your assumption is incorrect, Trump won. What you are seeing is an effort to overthrow him through corrupting the election and the media. You are supporting authoritarianism and you don't even have the first clue. You are ignorant.

[Uncle Sparky]

Wow. You are an idiot. Loser. Trump is a grifter, and you are a chump.

[Ming]

And you are lacking actual facts...