Tweet
Originally posted by Jon Miller
View Post
-
No one is lying except the media, saying there is no evidence.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
Benford's law is used to look for fraud in election data.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
Instead of using charts and graphs, why don't do you try to find actual proof... because so far, Trump and his minions haven't done a very good job of that yet.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Benford’s law has serious limitations (It has nearly no predictive power) when applied to electoral data. This has been known for a very long time.Originally posted by Kidicious View PostOne day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
Again with this logical fallacy (unless you have proof you don't have evidence).Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Well I'd like to see some evidence to show that it's not predictive, like daya from other elections that also don't follow Bedford's law.Originally posted by Dauphin View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
Imagine if Trump declared the Earth is flat... how much "evidence" would start circulating on the internet proving that there is a globalist conspiracy to make people think the Earth is round
Comment
-
Benford's law is used by election commissions to determine fraud.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Originally posted by giblets View PostImagine if Trump declared the Earth is flat... how much "evidence" would start circulating on the internet proving that there is a globalist conspiracy to make people think the Earth is round
whistleblowers aren't conspiracy theories.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
The mathematics of Benford’s law do not apply in scenarios where numbers are constrained by limits (E.g a minimum or aximum value) and do not extend over orders of magnitude. Voting wards have a fixed upper and potentially lower limit (wards are limited by the population) and votes for a party generally don’t stretch across more than one order of magnitude for any given ward size.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
Ladies and gentlemen, we have our first documented case of election fraud.
COMMITTED BY A TRUMP VOTER
Throw out the results for Trump, all electoral votes to Biden (based on the logic being thrown around by Trump apologists).
https://fox8.com/news/luzerne-county...ceased-mother/
Actually it appears this happened all the way back in October during early voting ! lol
Last edited by Ted Striker; November 11, 2020, 18:27.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
Naturally we should estimate how many Trump voters have a dead mother and throw out all of their votes
Comment
-
Now I've consulted Moore's Law and the vote ratio should be exponential based on how many mothers and in-laws he has. The coefficient rule means an inverse setting of 10/1 in favor of Trump. I know because Alex Jones told me and I didn't bother to check his work, I just ran with it and shared it on Facebook.
-
-
It's still a tool that is used, although it's problematic when used to determining election fraud.Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
" It is not simply that the Law occasionally judges
a fraudulent election fair or a fair election fraudulent. Its ‘‘success rate’’ either way is essentially equivalent to
a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst."
- Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud
Joseph Deckert, Mikhail Myagkov, and Peter C. Ordeshook
University of Oregon 97403 and California Institute of Technology 91124
e-mail: ordeshook@hss.caltech.edu (corresponding authorI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Think it through carefully Kid. If 1 in 100 cases is actually a fraud, the coin flip is telling you that half of the cases are fraud... it's pretty ****ing useless. If 50 of 100 cases are actually a fraud and the coin flip is misdiagnosing half of the frauduent ones as genuine and misdiagnosing half the genuine ones as fraud.....it's still pretty ****ing useless.
-
Comment