Who do you tip to win the US presidential election

[Lancer]

Lets say you have arbitrarily a hundred thou people in a district, but that district gives 200,000 votes to a candidate. A mathematician says that's a tad odd. I tend to agree. The difference between myself and one hell of a lot of Dems is, I agree no matter which candidate. Call me a sucker. Not these #s but supposedly there are places with more ballots than voters. Go figure.

[-Jrabbit]

That hasn't actually happened, Lancer. Debunked.

[Lancer]

I'd like to thank my boy Rudy G for captaining this one up and being Trump's stooge / fall guy. It's better to have a dumbass in charge, makes them easier to defeat. Sort of like keeping Hitler alive to bring the Nazis to complete capitulation faster.

What a clown show LOL

Something about the look of the chick over his left shoulder gives me the creeps.

[Ted Striker]

HAHA I noticed her too

[giblets]

Lets say you have arbitrarily a hundred thou people in a district, but that district gives 200,000 votes to a candidate. A mathematician says that's a tad odd. I tend to agree. The difference between myself and one hell of a lot of Dems is, I agree no matter which candidate. Call me a sucker. Not these #s but supposedly there are places with more ballots than voters. Go figure.

Great, can you name these places?

[Ming]

I don't know if it's that many people or not. Maybe it's more. But the election was not safe and secure. That's a lie. The system was designed for fraud, not for security. And there is mathematical evidence of fraud. You can check his math, or find someone else to. But if you think Biden’s lawyers can just go into the Supreme Court and say a bunch of people say the election was secure then you are in for the shock of your life.

Please point out ANYWHERE where I suggested or implied that Biden's Lawyers would go to the Supreme Court


Your claiming the elections were not safe and that's it's a lie they weren't is just an opinion.
They system was NOT DESIGNED for fraud. The fact that there hasn't EVER been any proof of massive election fraud or that mail in ballots lead to fraud sums it up. NO FACTS to support your claims.

[Kidlicious]

Why did they only interview registered Republicans?

Because it's up to the Democrats to prove fraud against themselves? There wasn't any. But if you want to spend time and money finding that out that's your dime.

[Dauphin]

Why did they only interview registered Republicans?

That sworn statement is hilarious. It effectively says “I studied data given to me by the Trump Campaign. I did no verification of its accuracy. This is my analysis of the data provided”.

I’ve worked on many expert witness statements. This is garbage in, garbage out analysis.

[Lancer]

Kid, think on this. Odds before the election had Trump victory at 10%. Currently those odds are 15%.

[Kidlicious]

That sworn statement is hilarious. It effectively says “I studied data given to me by the Trump Campaign. I did no verification of its accuracy. This is my analysis of the data provided”.

I’ve worked on many expert witness statements. This is garbage in, garbage out analysis.

There's no garbage in. You made that up. Nice conspiracy theory.

[Kidlicious]

Kid, think on this. Odds before the election had Trump victory at 10%. Currently those odds are 15%.

I think they were down to 6% at one point. Did you put money down?

[Lancer]

Nah........

[Dauphin]

The data is from the trump campaign. It has no credibility.

[giblets]

Because it's up to the Democrats to prove fraud against themselves? There wasn't any. But if you want to spend time and money finding that out that's your dime.

Surely you would have a stronger case if you could show that there aren't as many registered Democrats whose ballots are unaccounted for as there are registered Republicans?

[Kidlicious]

The data is from the trump campaign. It has no credibility.

It does with the FEC. Nice try.

[Dauphin]

You mean Trey Trainor. A Republican lawyer, Trump advisor since 2016, and Trump appointee as of this year.

[Kidlicious]

Surely you would have a stronger case if you could show that there aren't as many registered Democrats whose ballots are unaccounted for as there are registered Republicans?

It's not necessary. You only have to show that fraud was likely and that your candidate lost.

[Kidlicious]

There is an audit now in PA.

https://www.newsweek.com/pennsylvania-governor-confident-biden-win-house-republicans-call-election-audit-1549184

[Ted Striker]

I thought that was on your fake news list? Make up your mind.

[Ted Striker]