Tweet
Originally posted by Lancer
View Post
-
Scotus prepared to get this case? I saw this but don't really understand what it means exactly.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
Blah blah blah... deep state... blah blah blah.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
The lawyers haven't brought up ANYTHING in court, and that's the whole point. They got nothing.
And more than just one judge has tossed the many Trump fake cases...
Kid dictionary... Activist Judge - Any judge that disagrees with Kids conspiracy theories...
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
That guys kind of boring, but this is the article about the math expert that analyzed the PA count.Originally posted by Lancer View Post
"In sworn statement, prominent mathematician flags up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots
Federal Elections Commission Chairman Trey Trainor says new analysis by professor Steven Miller "adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year's election."
0:57By Daniel Payne and John Solomon
Updated: November 19, 2020 - 11:56pm
In a sworn declaration, a respected mathematician says his analysis of election data and phone interviews with Pennsylvania voters raises questions about as many as 100,000 absentee ballots requested in the key battleground state where President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by just about 82,000 votes.
Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data collected by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard as well as 2,684 voter interviews conducted by a phone bank and found two concerning patterns. One involved possible votes that were not counted, the other ballots that appeared to be requested by someone other than a registered voter.
"I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801," Miller said in the sworn statement provided to Just the News.
File
Miller_DeclarationAndAnalyisPA_GOP_BallotRequestD ata_2020_Final.pdf
According to Pennsylvania state data for early and absentee ballot requests, there are roughly 165,000 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that had not been counted as of Nov. 16.
Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor told Just the News that Miller's analysis provides fresh evidence of potential voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
"This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year's election," Trainor said.
"Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters."
The Pennsylvania Department of State's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday evening.
In addition to his two base estimates, Miller also offered two estimates with broader ranges and higher confidence intervals. "Almost surely, the number of ballots requested by someone other than the registered Republican is between 37,001 and 58,914," Miller writes. "Almost surely the number of ballots requested by registered Republicans and returned but not counted is in the range from 38,910 to 56,483."
Matt Braynard, the director of the Voter Integrity Project, which conducted the survey, said Miller's conclusions are "indicative of a kind of problem that we're seeing not just in Pennsylvania but in many of the other states that are determining the outcome of this election."
"We're sharing our data for the other states so that Professor Miller can conduct a similar analysis on them," he told Just the News on Thursday. "I look forward to seeing the results."
Miller's analysis comes after numerous Pennsylvania voters have described what appear to be widespread irregularities in the voting process there.
Voters in that state described to Just the News receiving absentee ballots in spite of having not requested them; when they showed up at their polling place, they were required to vote with provisional ballots.
In some cases, mail-in ballots that went unmailed were still listed as "pending" on the state's ballot tracking website as of this week.
A record number of Americans voted by mail in the 2020 election, driven by concerns that crowded polling places could become superspreader events for COVID-19.
Major get-out-the-vote campaigns sought to familiarize voters with the mail-in process for both the primary and general elections, though numerous issues were reported over the course of the year, including multiple absentee ballots mailed to individual voters, ballots being mailed to dead voters, and votes appearing to go uncounted well after Election Day. "I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Again, a lot of words but no actual proof. Just a lot of innuendos, theory, but yet again, no real proof. Just one man's "opinion"Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
It appears to be that each SCOTUS justice gets a few states, and will rule on those states. If the election is totally fooked to the point where neither candidate can get 270 (each now has zero) then SCOTUS can send it to the states. Not sure precisely how that works, but each state legislature gets 1 vote. The Republicans have 31 and the Dems 19. So, Trump wins.Originally posted by Kidicious View PostLong time member @ Apolyton
Civilization player since the dawn of timeComment
-
SCOTUS can rule that the election isn't legitimate. I guess that they can rule on the legitimacy in each state. I just don't know why justices are assigned to specific states.Originally posted by Lancer View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
No Ming. It's an expert opinion. It's math.Originally posted by Ming View Post
Again, a lot of words but no actual proof. Just a lot of innuendos, theory, but yet again, no real proof. Just one man's "opinion"I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Expert opinion is evidence in court. Maybe he's Trump's expert witness. So no. It's not just an opinion.Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
No... it's just another opinion...
The Trump administration’s own top cybersecurity official, election officials from both parties in all 50 states and international observers have affirmed that the Nov. 3 contest was secure and not hampered by widespread irregularities or fraud.
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Which is nothing but a bunch of liars. Trump will present evidence then what do you think is going to happen, a bunch of fake news liars are going to tell them that's not evidence?Originally posted by Ming View Post
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Gee, Trump, the most lying president in modern history.
And remember, it's not the fake media questioning Trumps BS evidence, it's judges.
Again... The Trump administration’s own top cybersecurity official, election officials from both parties in all 50 states and international observers have affirmed that the Nov. 3 contest was secure and not hampered by widespread irregularities or fraud.
All Trump has is some conspiracy math theories and opinions...
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
I don't know if it's that many people or not. Maybe it's more. But the election was not safe and secure. That's a lie. The system was designed for fraud, not for security. And there is mathematical evidence of fraud. You can check his math, or find someone else to. But if you think Biden’s lawyers can just go into the Supreme Court and say a bunch of people say the election was secure then you are in for the shock of your life.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
I'd like to thank my boy Rudy G for captaining this one up and being Trump's stooge / fall guy. It's better to have a dumbass in charge, makes them easier to defeat. Sort of like keeping Hitler alive to bring the Nazis to complete capitulation faster.
What a clown show LOL
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham LincolnComment
-
Why did they only interview registered Republicans?Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data collected by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard as well as 2,684 voter interviews conducted by a phone bank and found two concerning patterns. One involved possible votes that were not counted, the other ballots that appeared to be requested by someone other than a registered voter.
"I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801," Miller said in the sworn statement provided to Just the News.Comment
Comment