Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
what happened to the großrossiya thread
Collapse
X
-
-
I am talking about defeating the Axis as a whole. Not just the Nazis.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
No question the Nazi invasion of USSR developed into such a dire situation that had USSR been under just a bit more pressure or had a bit less assistance it would become easy to imagine scenarios where the USSR might have been overrun by the fascists. This does not mean the USSR did not inflict most of the casualties and most of the strategic losses that the Nazis took in ww2. The USSR did most of the work of defeating the Nazis even if, perhaps, it did not quite do most of the work of winning ww2 overall. It's hard to find a measure of overall progress in the Nazi defeat where the soviets do not deserve most of the credit.Originally posted by giblets View PostThe Soviets would have had more problems if the Japanese hadn't been tied up in China and the Pacific
Comment
-
You probably can get away with arguing that perhaps the soviets did not do most of the work of defeating the entire axis by various measures. However, the only post serb made that you might appear to be responding to does not seem to be speaking of the axis of a whole but rather the Wehrmacht, which certainly cannot somehow be construed to encompass even the Italians, let alone the Japanese.Originally posted by Dinner View PostI am talking about defeating the Axis as a whole. Not just the Nazis.
For the record, the Wehrmacht was in critical danger of collapse in January 1942. The 1941 soviet winter counteroffensive was devastating to the Wehrmacht and had the severe cold weather not abated in time, it might well have collapsed.Originally posted by Serb View PostIn your wet dreams - perhaps. I can feel your butthurt, dude. But the truth is - the Wehrmacht was on a brink of collapse in January 1942 - after the Soviet counter-offensive at Moscow - long before the Western aid appeared in quantities (not to mention that whole Lend-Lease was about just 5% of Soviet war effort and not to mention that it wasn't a humanitarian aid - we have paid for it with gold and the last Lend-Lease debts the Soviet Union have repaid only in 1970's if I remember correctly).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostIt was a collective effort and everyone fought valiantly
although I have a question: how the hell the germans were allowed to become so powerful?
Again, Serb never claimed that only the Soviets fought well or valiantly. He only claimed that by 1942 the Wehrmacht was on the brink of collapse. A reasonable position.
The Germans were allowed to become so powerful, because they had a proficient professional military and a strong economy to back it up and nobody had the will to oppose them militarily until it was almost too late and when they finally did move to stop the Germans militarily, they screwed up tactically and strategically and the Soviets waited until the Western front had collapsed (and they in turn were invaded) to lift a finger to stop Hitler.
That, in a nutshell, is how the Germans were allowed to become so powerful.
Comment
-
-
Good economic fundamentals apparently. It happened again after their defeat, ditto for the Japanese. I think the question of why a particular economy performs so well always invites a great deal of speculation but the economic theories used to construct such explanations have such a lousy track record at predicting future results that I don't place much faith in them. I regard the field of macro-economics as a very frustrating set of problems to solve and difficult systems to adequately model.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostAlthough,
how did the germans had a strong economy?
I thought that the versailles treaty was devasting to them and that's why hitler came to power.
Comment
-
Oh I don't think that's such a big mystery.Originally posted by Geronimo View PostGood economic fundamentals apparently. It happened again after their defeat, ditto for the Japanese. I think the question of why a particular economy performs so well always invites a great deal of speculation but the economic theories used to construct such explanations have such a lousy track record at predicting future results that I don't place much faith in them. I regard the field of macro-economics as a very frustrating set of problems to solve and difficult systems to adequately model.
The anwer is simple: discipline.
I say jump you say how high?
I say kill the jew/chinese you say yes
etc etc
Discipline is what makes economies flourish and what creates monsters
(btw this extrapolates to nearly everyone)
Comment
Comment