what happened to the großrossiya thread

[giblets]

[Serb]

!!!
I've seen that sh!t already. Thank you!

[Serb]

That's how the western brainwashing machine works - post a single explosion (that's not even a missile, me thinks) and you can claim that four hospitals were destroyed. The idiots will buy the sh!t anyway. What is the place on that video and who/what caused that explosion - who cares? You have a picture - let the bullsh!t flows!!!

[giblets]

Did the hospital bomb itself?

[Serb]

Where is the hospital?

And why the f*ck Russians are always responsible for any explosion?

[Serb]

Black is white, lie is truth, war is peace.
Well done, Orwell

[giblets]

Orwell based his book off of your country

[Serb]

That is a common misconception. He wrote his book about the future Britain.

[giblets]

The premise of the book is that future Britain has a stalinist political system.

[Geronimo]

The complete dehumanization is that scenario. And it is already going. A World of masters and slaves, in a way we have never seen before. A World based on lies.

Ok. Is there any place in the world as it is now where we might find an example of people forced to live in the kind of master slave relationship you see as ubiquitous in world Russia's enemies want to drag us into?

Would it fall under one of the classes of modern slavery defined here:

http://www.antislavery.org/english/slavery_today/what_is_modern_slavery.aspx

including:

Bonded labour
Child slavery
Early and forced marriage
Forced labour
Descent-based slavery
Trafficking

-or do you mean 'slavery' in some sort of figurative sense? If so can you describe the "slavery" in literal terms?

-or some sort of shadowy "slavery" where the slaves might not even know who their masters are and there is nobody in the system who openly acknowledges that they are slaves?

-or not individual slavery but some sort of "collective" slavery where not individuals but organizations of individuals (such as their nation sates) are "enslaved" by some outside individual or groups of individuals?


Do you mean some combination of these ideas?

It seems to me that most, if not all, of the enemies of Russia that you identify are overtly opposed in policy, execution of policy, and in their ideologies to any of these forms of "slavery" with the possible exception of the figurative versions or "enslavement" of organizations by outsiders (which is pretty much most federations to some degree).

Of all the things you take time to post here, I would think this would be the area you would want to devote the most time to clarifying and expanding on as it's clearly the outcome you most passionately oppose.

[Dinner]

Where is the hospital?

And why the f*ck Russians are always responsible for any explosion?

It was a dumb bomb (I.E. not a smart bomb with a guidance system) and Russia is the only country using those in Syria plus they are the only ones bombing the Moderate Opposition (you guys have barely bombed any ISIS targets at all preferring to attack moderates as they are the real threat to the survival of the dictatorship).

[Geronimo]

It was a dumb bomb (I.E. not a smart bomb with a guidance system) and Russia is the only country using those in Syria plus they are the only ones bombing the Moderate Opposition (you guys have barely bombed any ISIS targets at all preferring to attack moderates as they are the real threat to the survival of the dictatorship).

As we already know Turkey has at least occasionally bombed the armed Kurdish forces in Syria, why are you so convinced that nobody apart from Russia is bombing the "Moderate Opposition"? Surely you agree that Assad, at least, has never completely ceased launching air strikes on the "moderate opposition"?

[Proteus_MST]

As we already know Turkey has at least occasionally bombed the armed Kurdish forces in Syria, why are you so convinced that nobody apart from Russia is bombing the "Moderate Opposition"? Surely you agree that Assad, at least, has never completely ceased launching air strikes on the "moderate opposition"?

Aren´t the Turks not only enemies of the Kurds but also enemies of Assad?
In this case it wouldn´t make sense to bomb the moderate opposition of Assad.
(I guess the hospital/s bombed weren´t near the Kurd territory (i.e. far to the north) so any mistaking them for any kurdish installations wouldn´t be possible ... isn´t it?)

[Dinner]

Ok, I was specifically talking about the FSA (which Turkey has not bonbed) though I suppose you are right that the Kurds could also be called part of the moderate opposition.

[Bereta_Eder]

Aren´t the Turks not only enemies of the Kurds but also enemies of Assad?

Turkey has ammassed so many enemies she doesn't know which way the sun shines anymore.

Its primary concer is the kurds though, that's why it has systematically bombed them and supplied ISIS.

Russia creating a defacto no fly zone in northern Syria (except for russian planes) is heaven's sent for the kurds. (which is very probable they are endlessly supplied by amicable countries)