Originally posted by MrFun
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Supreme Court rules in favor of public legislative prayers
Collapse
X
-
This is also illegal - which was Felch's point. People do illegal things sometimes.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
-
Good job.Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostHigher body count thus far.
But the similarities or parallel I was referring to, was ideological temperament with the purpose of forcing everyone to live according to their religious belief; not body counts.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
So.... you have no real point?Originally posted by MrFun View PostGee, ya think?“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
My point is that Felch is downplaying societal pressure and pressure of conformity too much. With regard to public prayer, yes, people are protected to an extent by law against compulsion to pray in contradiction to their own belief, and so on. But only to an extent.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostSo.... you have no real point?
Felch seems to be okay with public prayer in government setting, based on the fact that it's illegal to compel or pressure others to violate their own belief. He's not considering the factor of informal social pressure, fear, and so on.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Informal social pressure, fear, etc. are not things that the Constitution concerns itself with.... which, btw is Felch's point in its entirety.Originally posted by MrFun View PostMy point is that Felch is downplaying societal pressure and pressure of conformity too much. With regard to public prayer, yes, people are protected to an extent by law against compulsion to pray in contradiction to their own belief, and so on. But only to an extent.
Felch seems to be okay with public prayer in government setting, based on the fact that it's illegal to compel or pressure others to violate their own belief. He's not considering the factor of informal social pressure, fear, and so on.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Which is why you stood up for Mozilla's CEO?purpose of forcing everyone to live according to their religious beliefScouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
-
Ok, this makes you sound even more silly...Originally posted by MrFun View PostIt was a slip-up. I should have said Tealiban Christians to specify, rather than all Christians.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Strongly disagree.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostInformal social pressure, fear, etc. are not things that the Constitution concerns itself with....
Comment
Comment