Originally posted by DinoDoc
View Post
A more radical reform would, first, end both Medicare and Medicaid, at least for new entrants, and replace them by providing every family in the United States with catastrophic insurance (i.e., a major medical policy with a high deductible). Second, it would end tax exemption of employer-provided medical care. And, third, it would remove the restrictive regulations that are now imposed on medical insurance—hard to justify with universal catastrophic insurance.
Friedman also talks about how single payer is better than our mixed system because the government monopoly can hold prices down by rationing. That may be a more feasible way to remove employer provided health care - though the true costs would be hidden through taxation rather than employers paying most of the premiums, so the basic problem would still be there.
Comment