Two and only two points in your parse and twist drivel.
Let's see if I can explain the concept, in a way simple enough for you. In case you weren't aware, this is an off-topic forum, within a gaming forum, within a gaming site, where people generally come to relax and have fun. It is not an academic journal, it is not a workplace.
You're the one who got bent out of shape over a single less than ten word post, then you start whining "It's my field." "It's my field." "I have a degree" like some pathetic brat. Just because you want to stand in front of a mirror in the locker room with ruler in hand doesn't mean anyone else has to play. Nor does it mean you gain credibility.
You can presume whatever you want. I don't care.
Yep, rather than address the point that Hus was excommunicated by the Council of Constance (another damned historical fact!), you resort to personal attacks and emotional appeals (and non-sequitors).
I gave specific dates. locations, the name of the archbishop and the basis for the excommunication of Hus years earlier. All of which are undisputed, available in multiple catholic and non-catholic sources. No absolution was ever granted. All conveniently ignored by you in your obsessive focus on proving a missed point. It doesn't matter what the Council of Constanz did wrt excommunication of Hus - he had already been excommunicated for over three years and the prior excommunication was in effect. All the pronouncement at the council did was restate what was already in effect and published years prior, as a pro forma part of sentencing Hus to be burnt.
This is a perfect encapsulation of your intellectual limits, dishonesty and trolling games. In short, why you're a complete ass worth no further acknowledgement or response.
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
View Post
You're the one who got bent out of shape over a single less than ten word post, then you start whining "It's my field." "It's my field." "I have a degree" like some pathetic brat. Just because you want to stand in front of a mirror in the locker room with ruler in hand doesn't mean anyone else has to play. Nor does it mean you gain credibility.
You can presume whatever you want. I don't care.
Yep, rather than address the point that Hus was excommunicated by the Council of Constance (another damned historical fact!), you resort to personal attacks and emotional appeals (and non-sequitors).
I gave specific dates. locations, the name of the archbishop and the basis for the excommunication of Hus years earlier. All of which are undisputed, available in multiple catholic and non-catholic sources. No absolution was ever granted. All conveniently ignored by you in your obsessive focus on proving a missed point. It doesn't matter what the Council of Constanz did wrt excommunication of Hus - he had already been excommunicated for over three years and the prior excommunication was in effect. All the pronouncement at the council did was restate what was already in effect and published years prior, as a pro forma part of sentencing Hus to be burnt.
This is a perfect encapsulation of your intellectual limits, dishonesty and trolling games. In short, why you're a complete ass worth no further acknowledgement or response.
Comment