Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are states' rights more important than human lives?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ben, you realize your post #267 has almost comical errors in detailing a) what Milton Friedman (and the Monetarist school) believes and b) what Postivism is; to the point where you just about ascribe the exact opposite of their beliefs to them.
    Sigh.

    I understand better than you. I believe in Natural Law. I believe that laws can be intrinsically good and bad, and that laws that are intrinsically bad ought to be repealed.

    Positivism comes from Bentham and utilitarianism. Positivism denies that laws can be intrinsically good or bad - they merely 'are'. A system is a system, we cannot assess whether the system is good or bad in all cases - because that it meaningless. We can only take things case by case. A law which is good in one instance may be bad in another.

    Positivists believe that law is a construct of human society, and that law can only be a law within that society - change the society and the laws must change to reflect that society.

    Natural Law (per Aquinas), is very different. It believes there exists a universal norm and that all societies are bound to their universal norm, and that this is both knowable (by most people), and that a law can be assessed based on whether it conforms with natural law.

    And I never attributed any statement to Friedman. All I said is that it doesn't matter who is calling for perpetual government spending beyond the means of the state - they are wrong. It will not lead to prosperity - it will lead to ruin.
    Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
    "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
    2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
      Plenty of people ask this quite often actually . Economists have shown themselves to be very bad at prediction. Its more like making educated guesses, but the world economy is not so easy to tame. I've come to see it as more akin to philosphy than biology.
      Duh, how is a predictable business cycle even possible?

      Comment


      • The leaps in logic BK makes are astounding.
        To us, it is the BEAST.

        Comment


        • Thanks, I was taught all this by a lawyer friend of mine, many years ago.
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
            Positivism denies that laws can be intrinsically good or bad - they merely 'are'. A system is a system, we cannot assess whether the system is good or bad in all cases - because that it meaningless. We can only take things case by case. A law which is good in one instance may be bad in another.

            Positivists believe that law is a construct of human society, and that law can only be a law within that society - change the society and the laws must change to reflect that society.
            Um... Legal Positivism is not the same as Philosophical Positivism.


            Positivism assumes that there is valid knowledge (truth) only in scientific knowledge.[2] Obtaining and verifying data that can be received from the senses is known as empirical evidence.[1] This view holds that society operates according to general laws like the physical world. Introspective and intuitional attempts to gain knowledge are rejected.
            Basically: you understand nothing, Ben Snow.

            And I never attributed any statement to Friedman.
            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
            Friedman can spend into oblivion
            That's back to back posts, btw. Why exactly would Friedman spend anything?
            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

            Comment


            • Um... Legal Positivism is not the same as Philosophical Positivism.
              So, it's just a 'coincidence' that the two share the same name?

              No, it's not a coincidence. But you know that, which is why you're making this argument.

              One, Positivism has nothing to do with empiricism. Empiricism explicitly states that it can only apply to things that can be measured. Empiricism explicitly states that it is only partial understanding of the world - and not the complete understanding of the world.

              Basically, empiricism is a tool - it helps you get to where you are going. Positivism reverses this, the tool becomes the goal - what you use to measure then becomes the truth that you find. If you choose not to find something, or choose not to see it, then it no longer exists.

              Positivism fits in well with Marxism because both are materialist philosophies, and both deny the existence of absolute truth. Empiricism, on the other hand explicitly argues that it is limited - one cannot gain the whole sum of knowledge through it - even as it's principles are useful for obtaining reliable evidence.

              When you're done citing wikipedia as evidence of the breadth of your education, maybe we can get onto a serious discussion?
              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

              Comment


              • You know who else was an Austrian? HITLER. Coincidence? I think not.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                  Plenty of people ask this quite often actually . Economists have shown themselves to be very bad at prediction. Its more like making educated guesses, but the world economy is not so easy to tame. I've come to see it as more akin to philosphy than biology.
                  Dude, economics, particularly microeconomics, makes TONS of predictions. It can't predict the stock market or business cycle, because if it could, then they would cease to be useful or exist, respectively. But it can predict stuff like demand curves. I have no idea what you're on about. If it didn't predict anything at all, it would be like religion: Unfalsifiable and useless.
                  If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                  ){ :|:& };:

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                    So, it's just a 'coincidence' that the two share the same name?
                    You are hopeless.

                    Do you also believe that the economic term of 'rational' is the exact same as the the philosophical term and therefore someone who is mentally ill, but wants more of a good rather than less, should be considered rational?

                    When you're done citing wikipedia as evidence of the breadth of your education, maybe we can get onto a serious discussion?
                    I am sorry that your views are so dramatically at odds with the collected knowledge (which is what wikipedia is). That is how we define terms, by the vast majority agreeing on their definition. Must be hard to know you fall on the side of falsity.
                    Last edited by Imran Siddiqui; January 4, 2013, 16:50.
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment


                    • it would be like religion: Unfalsifiable and useless.
                      Like I said, to them it's Margaritaville.

                      Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                      "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                      2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                      Comment


                      • Do you also believe that the economic term of 'rational' is the exact same as the the philosophical term and therefore someone who is mentally ill, but wants more of a good rather than less, should be considered rational?
                        Do I believe that there is a rationale for irrational people to demonstrate rationality in a ratio according to their mental stability? Yes.

                        I am sorry that your views are so dramatically at odds with the collected knowledge (which is what wikipedia is).
                        It's also not a reliable source.

                        Hey look, the article says that Positivism was invented by Jesus.
                        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                        Comment


                        • Far more reliable than you.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • Far more reliable than you
                            Wow, I didn't know I was the standard for assessing document reliability.
                            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                              Wow, I didn't know I was the standard for assessing document reliability.

                              Lets say it this way - you make the Protocols of Zion sound almost sane.
                              With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                              Steven Weinberg

                              Comment


                              • Lets say it this way - you make the Protocols of Zion sound almost sane.
                                Sorry, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It's not even a particularly good one. Maybe in another 10 years it will start getting good. It needs lots and lots of work.
                                Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                                "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                                2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X