The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Scouse Git (2)La Fayette Adam SmithSolomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Yeah I keep meaning to stop posting about you, but whenever I remember what a terrible, terrible knowledge of history you have, I just can't help commenting on it. I'm sure I'll grow out of it.
For someone who claims expertise in evaluating instructors, you sure are coy about your qualifications.
Scouse Git (2)La Fayette Adam SmithSolomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
For someone who claims expertise in evaluating instructors, you sure are coy about your qualifications.
Pretty much every statement you make is either wrong or untrue. You're also fundamentally dishonest. It doesn't require a particular branch of degree to tell that you shouldnt be allowed anywhere near the education of children.
Pretty much every statement you make is either wrong or untrue. You're also fundamentally dishonest. It doesn't require a particular branch of degree to tell that you shouldnt be allowed anywhere near the education of children.
Kentonio: you're not possessed of mind reading abilities. Stick with the tarot and astrology. These fantasies of yours are just pathetic.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
Kentonio: you're not possessed of mind reading abilities. Stick with the tarot and astrology. These fantasies of yours are just pathetic.
You think it takes a mind reader to know that Ben is fundamentally dishonest? You don't think his complete inability to tell the truth, even when he is repeatedly proven to be in the wrong might be a bit of an indicator?
You think it takes a mind reader to know that Ben is fundamentally dishonest? You don't think his complete inability to tell the truth, even when he is repeatedly proven to be in the wrong might be a bit of an indicator?
When people disagree with your politics and reasoning it is likely because they do not acknowledge it as being correct. BK's political views are completely unremarkable. Millions of people worldwide share some, or all of his views, for varying reasons. There is, in short, no reason to suppose that BK is dishonest merely because he disagrees with you and because his views irritate you. What's more, honesty is a personal quality. Such qualities are, I think, nigh impossible to judge from postings on political issues on an internet forum. So you make this judgement merely as a byproduct of your own views about his politics, not his personality. You've done the same to me.
Take the converse position: you've disagreed with my views and called me "fundamentally dishonest" for them. Do you really think I've concluded you're "fundamentally dishonest" because you've accused BK and myself of possessing that quality? Or for your politics? Of course not. The more likely explanations for your accusations are ignorance, naiveté, immaturity, foolishness, and perhaps most importantly, a Manichean worldview. You think yourself an agent of good; those who disagree with you are therefore agents of evil. So too, the likely explanation for your politics is simple: progressivism is a common political ideology, and you share in it. (No, progressives are not necessarily Manichaeans).
Well, so too with BK: social and political conservatism are quite common in American society and there is no reason to suppose that those who agree with those views are dishonest. Possibly you do not know many conservatives and this makes you more willing to caricature them. Possibly you're inclined to agree with caricatures because they help define your Manichean view of politics.
See? No psychoanalysis here: merely a judgement of your politics, based on the evidence.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
People don't call Ben dishonest because of his politics, it's because he lies. Seriously, how can you always write so much and say absolutely nothing?
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
When people disagree with your politics and reasoning it is likely because they do not acknowledge it as being correct. BK's political views are completely unremarkable. Millions of people worldwide share some, or all of his views, for varying reasons. There is, in short, no reason to suppose that BK is dishonest merely because he disagrees with you and because his views irritate you. What's more, honesty is a personal quality. Such qualities are, I think, nigh impossible to judge from postings on political issues on an internet forum. So you make this judgement merely as a byproduct of your own views about his politics, not his personality. You've done the same to me.
I call Ben a liar because he consistently lies. I've called you dishonest before, because on that occasion you were being dishonest. Funny how I don't call people like Sloww and HC dishonest isn't it. It's almost like maybe I can disagree with people without questioning their honesty isn't it.
When people disagree with your politics and reasoning it is likely because they do not acknowledge it as being correct. BK's political views are completely unremarkable. Millions of people worldwide share some, or all of his views, for varying reasons. There is, in short, no reason to suppose that BK is dishonest merely because he disagrees with you and because his views irritate you. What's more, honesty is a personal quality. Such qualities are, I think, nigh impossible to judge from postings on political issues on an internet forum. So you make this judgement merely as a byproduct of your own views about his politics, not his personality. You've done the same to me.
Take the converse position: you've disagreed with my views and called me "fundamentally dishonest" for them. Do you really think I've concluded you're "fundamentally dishonest" because you've accused BK and myself of possessing that quality? Or for your politics? Of course not. The more likely explanations for your accusations are ignorance, naiveté, immaturity, foolishness, and perhaps most importantly, a Manichean worldview. You think yourself an agent of good; those who disagree with you are therefore agents of evil. So too, the likely explanation for your politics is simple: progressivism is a common political ideology, and you share in it. (No, progressives are not necessarily Manichaeans).
Well, so too with BK: social and political conservatism are quite common in American society and there is no reason to suppose that those who agree with those views are dishonest. Possibly you do not know many conservatives and this makes you more willing to caricature them. Possibly you're inclined to agree with caricatures because they help define your Manichean view of politics.
See? No psychoanalysis here: merely a judgement of your politics, based on the evidence.
What Dashi said.
The guy lies about verifiable facts and then when called squirms.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Tweet
Comment