Code:
53 47 CA 32 32 TX 29 25 NY 25 24 FL 19 16 IL 19 16 PA 18 15 OH 15 13 MI 13 13 GA 13 12 NC 13 11 NJ 11 10 VA 9 8 WA 8 8 AZ 10 8 MA 9 8 IN 9 8 TN 9 8 MO 8 7 MD 8 7 WI 8 7 MN 7 6 CT 7 6 AL 6 6 SC 7 6 LA 6 5 KY 5 5 OR 5 5 OK 5 4 CT 5 4 IA 4 4 MS 4 4 AR 4 4 KA 3 3 UT 3 3 NV 3 3 NM 3 2 WV 3 2 NB 2 2 ID 2 2 NH 2 2 ME 2 2 HI 2 1 RI 1 1 MT 1 1 DA 1 1 SD 1 1 AK 1 1 ND 1 1 VT 1 1 DC 1 1 WY 17 ONT 10 QBC 6 BRC 5 ALB 1 MAN 1 SAK 1 NVS 1 NBK 1 NFD 1 PEI 0 NWT 0 YKT 0 NUV 44
Canada would have 44 representatives and 20 senators, under the 10 state solution. Under the 5 state solution, they would have 44 reps and 10 senators, with one seat moving from eastern canada, to western canada.
To give you a better idea, they would have the same clout as new england plus New York, New Jersey and Delaware under the 10 state solution.
In the 5 state solution, they would have as much clout as New England minus Connecticut.
There's one seat that would be uncertain.
New Mexico could lose a seat to either Manitoba or Utah.
Comment