WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Day Before 9-11
Collapse
X
-
Why, WHY, would they do it in the first place? This is one of those instances where if someone was as powerful as would be required to pull this off, they would have no reason to have to."The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patroklos View PostWHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
Ming's point has been subtly ignored by our pet troll however. Why wouldn't the government destroy a building in a safe Democrat state, without a major role in the nation's economy, in order to scare their opponents into voting for their defence of America, and American values? Although given the last election results, it doesn't look like they got what they wanted by using planes against New York, did they?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patroklos View Post
Why, WHY, would they do it in the first place? This is one of those instances where if someone was as powerful as would be required to pull this off, they would have no reason to have to.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
-
Damn. Every thread I open has you saying something utterly retarded. You must be trying to do it.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostAnd that's the nail in the coffin, HL. Your conspiracy theory is so utterly loony that even Berz doesn't believe it.
Oh yeah, I dont believe in the lone gunman theory But thats because of Jack Ruby's involvement. Okay, thats one conspiracy I'll buy into.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duke o' york View PostMing's point has been subtly ignored by our pet troll however. Why wouldn't the government destroy a building in a safe Democrat state, without a major role in the nation's economy, in order to scare their opponents into voting for their defence of America, and American values?
So they won't bother trying to address it... because it blow's their "theory" out the window.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by HalfLotus View PostThe problem with the 'pancake' theory is it doesn't explain the free-fall collapse.
On the CCTW fire, the building was engineered to withstand earthquakes and, unlike WTC7, did not suffer major structural damage from a falling building before catching fire. Neither was its insulation blown off by an explosion.
As we can see, there is a significant amount of corner missing from WTC7.
However, the unprotected steel of an LA bridge did collapse after being subjected to a gasoline fueled fire. http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Tanker_t...akland_FreewayLast edited by chequita guevara; October 6, 2009, 19:42.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
I'm not surprised that you don't understand me. Anyone as caught up in a fantasy world as you would struggle.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by SlowwHand View PostI'm not surprised that you don't understand me. Anyone as caught up in a fantasy world as you would struggle.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
-
Originally posted by HalfLotus View PostFair enough, but the load bearing capacities of the middle and lower floors of WTC 1 & 2 are extremely high; buildings are always "over-engineered" in case of partial structural failure. They do not simply 'give way' when upper floors collapse - they do provide resistance - and are designed to carry those loads.
And as you can see in some videos, the collapse of the upper floors was not symmetrical. You see them totter to the side (likely due to the airplane impact taking out structural columns on some floors), yet the failure of everything below was symmetrical. Another unexplained anomaly.
I dont even see the point. Intel found out crazy Muslims were gonna fly planes into the buildings so they planted explosives to increase the damage so Americans would be mad enough to invade Iraq? The planes served that purpose...
Comment
-
I'll see what I can do to speed up the process to the point there are no pieces left.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by SlowwHand View PostI'll see what I can do to speed up the process to the point there are no pieces left.
Go post some more retarded Texan garbage. That stuff is awesome.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
Comment