The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
HalfLotus, you should read the latest Repairman Jack novel by Wilson. "Ground Zero"
The plot centers around the 9-11 conspiracy and provide some interesting theories.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Like I said, I've made one thread. And looks like, what, maybe 2 posts per year average re: the Fed?
A) FFS, those links were only to threads in which you posted multiple times, not to each such post, and moreover they only spanned a time period from October 2008 to the present, not anytime prior (don't insult my intelligence by skewing the "average" with the seven years you spent almost entirely in on-topic forums). Try more like two dozen posts in the last year alone. (link)
B) In any event it's not about frequency of posts on the topic, or thread OP's for that matter; it's about the proportion of all OTF posts on the topic. If someone only posted 30 times a year, but devoted 90% of those rare posts to the topic of UFOs, would it not be accurate to say that such a person is unusually fixated on UFOs?
HalfLotus, you should read the latest Repairman Jack novel by Wilson. "Ground Zero"
The plot centers around the 9-11 conspiracy and provide some interesting theories.
"less than satisfying"
-Publisher's Weekly
If the straight-shooters at PW weren't intrigued, a certified nutcase like me would be bored to death.
I read that review myself but have to admit that I, as a big RJ fan, found it quite satisfying since it answers some long outstanding questions.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
I read that review myself but have to admit that I, as a big RJ fan, found it quite satisfying since it answers some long outstanding questions.
Such as?
A) FFS, those links were only to threads in which you posted multiple times, not to each such post, and moreover they only spanned a time period from October 2008 to the present, not anytime prior (don't insult my intelligence by skewing the "average" with the seven years you spent almost entirely in on-topic forums). Try more like two dozen posts in the last year alone. (link)
B) In any event it's not about frequency of posts on the topic, or thread OP's for that matter; it's about the proportion of all OTF posts on the topic. If someone only posted 30 times a year, but devoted 90% of those rare posts to the topic of UFOs, would it not be accurate to say that such a person is unusually fixated on UFOs?
Darius, your self-spun arguments are agonizingly petty and boring. We're trying to put on a good show here for JRabbit and Co.
Stop shooting spitballs from the back row and giggling like a school girl. Take your skirt off, man up, and post something worth ****ing reading.
It filled in a lot of details about the old woman and her dog. And through the use of a childhood friend it tied together some early details in Jack's life to the current over plot.
The book was obviously a setup for the overall plot instead of focused on a non related "repair"
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Although, for some reason, I immediately related your mention of it to Joe the Plumber, and thought you were 2 in 1'ing me with conservative kook insults. Turns out you just like bad books.
Calling a book you haven't read bad, speaks really bad for your credibility on anything you debate. Calling it bad based on someone else's opinion is even worse.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Calling a book you haven't read bad, speaks really bad for your credibility on anything you debate. Calling it bad based on someone else's opinion is even worse.
Calling one person speaking his mind and other people calling him names a debate speaks "really bad (sic)" to your intelligence.
Apparently the debate starts when KH shows up; I'm trifling with you peons until then.
Calling one person speaking his mind and other people calling him names a debate speaks "really bad (sic)" to your intelligence.
Apparently the debate starts when KH shows up; I'm trifling with you peons until then.
Hey, not once did I call you a name until you dissed a book you hadn't read and I was just speaking my mind also.
So I guess that makes you a dickhead. And most of the peons that I know are really good hearted people. Something you couldn't even aspire too.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Tweet
I think it would be excellent if other people were to continue arguing with HalfLotus.
Comment