[serious] Off Topic Moderation Input - Part 2

[Egbert]

its not that I'm entertained by ben/kid/gianfezlo ****posting. I'm not. I find it super frustrating, actually. But on the other hand, I'm super lazy.

Laziness is an excellent quality for a moderator.

[rah]

Yes, but just clicking on the reply count that lists each posters post count in the thread can be a great indicator of whether you should open a thread.

[Lorizael]

We're going to keep having ****posters so long as the mods are entertained by ****posting

There were always ****posters. But they used to be diluted by quality or at least generic posters.

[self biased]

its not that I'm entertained by ben/kid/gianfezlo ****posting. I'm not. I find it super frustrating, actually. But on the other hand, I'm super lazy.

[loinburger]

We're going to keep having ****posters so long as the mods are entertained by ****posting

[Elok]

No, Kid would still be here, and Fez too.

[giblets]

Ban him permanently and the mods can retire

[DaShi]

Not for those six glorious months.

[giblets]

Banning Ben for just six months has proved pointless.

[Elok]

I thought you said bans below six months or so were pointless?

[Lorizael]

Is it possible to put a thread on Ignore?

That's a feature of the poster, not the forum software.

[Kidlicious]

One week isn't long enough.

It was the poster formally known as fez.

[DaShi]

One week isn't long enough.

[Aeson]

For one week for advocating bounties to run down protesters.

[ZEE]

is Ben Kenobi banned?