[serious] Off Topic Moderation Input - Part 2

[Kidlicious]

no i called you illiterate, JR merely agreed with me.

This is why people call you stupid.

[ZEE]

Kidicious is about to kick some ass and take some names... oh yeah!

:Popcorn:

[Kidlicious]

You and kentonio need to be banned. You're both immoral spiteful ****s.

[C0ckney]

no i called you illiterate, JR merely agreed with me.

[Kidlicious]

I have been trying very hard to avoid engaging Kid and Ben since their returns. And every time I slip in my resolve, almost unfailingly, in his own special way, each demonstrates how right my instinct is. The only downside is that I can't post in very many OT threads. Not a big loss for Poly, I grant you.

Do I think threadjacking is a serious problem here? Yes.
Do I think Ben and Kid are being treated poorly, including unwarranted personal attacks? Yes.
So, do I think we need to change the rules? No.


This is SO not the core issue.

First, most everyone here knows your opinion on every topic that's important to you. Relentless repetition does that.
Second, it's your intellectual dishonesty and twisting of arguments, not your actual opinions, that no one wants to deal with.
Third, your self-aggrandizing persecution complex grows ever more tiresome. Get off the pity pot.

n.b. -- Ben, if a self-imposed "I don't start political threads" policy is your excuse for jacking off all over any thread that, in your personal opinion and however tangentially, might touch on your current set of religious and/or political beliefs, PLEASE, for the love of all that is good and right in this world, go back to starting political threads.

[/soapbox]

Good luck, Aeson.

You mean when you called me an illiterate?

[C0ckney]

I've never said anything vile about women you damn liar

from like two minutes ago:

[it's] stupid to date women who claim to have been raped.

[I AM MOBIUS]

Indeed. However I would be the first to say that there should be a clear set of forum rules, as I think there already are, and if these two are not breaking them, they have the freedom to say these things - as we have the freedom to respond, or not, as the case may be...

[Kidlicious]

Nice spin doctoring. What actually happens is you say something vile about women, or Ben says something vile about.. well anything really. Other posters are then disgusted by what they've just read and call whoever wrote it a sick bigoted ****-puppet. You two then cry foul about how people are being nasty to you.

It really doesn't take a genius to see where the poison is coming from.

I've never said anything vile about women you damn liar. You are the real problem on this site you lying *******.

[kentonio]

IMO allowing posters to say horrible, uncivilized things about each other poisoned the environment. There's no sense in trying to make any real improvements unless this is changed.

Nice spin doctoring. What actually happens is you say something vile about women, or Ben says something vile about.. well anything really. Other posters are then disgusted by what they've just read and call whoever wrote it a sick bigoted ****-puppet. You two then cry foul about how people are being nasty to you.

It really doesn't take a genius to see where the poison is coming from.

[I AM MOBIUS]

I think the real solution instead of an imposed one is to simple *ask* that poster X not post in your thread, rather than some heavy handed moderation solution. It's a social problem with a social solution.

I've mostly abided by my personal rule of not posting my own political threads. I'm willing to abide with the "do not post in my threads" with one exception - anything concerning the Catholic church. Given that it's my faith I think it should be fair game. I think both of these is a good compromise. People get some of what they want, I get some of what I want. I've already sort of done that by signaling what threads I won't post in, "ie, threads with ****" in the title. That seemed to be working well.

Also - the whole, 'post is boring, let's ban, seems to me an even WORSE idea. Who defines 'boring'?

Also, I'd like to see a return of the rule of deleting threads attacking posters. We had that before. Posters right now feel that they are free to say whatever they like without repercussions. That's not really helping things. Poster A says that Poster B is the devil, and then goes around attacking poster B for 'making arguments he doesn't like. The inmates run the asylum now, Aeson.

But I'm not sure any of this will resolve the core issue, of people not wanting to read opinions that they disagree with being contrary to what's in the best interest of Poly. I think, really, the best solution is to just tell the folks who are complaining about views they don't like to just live with it. The more they feel that their views ought to be catered to in moderation, the demands will continue. If they feel that by complaining enough they will get what they will want - you've established a reward cycle.

I really suggest, for once, not rewarding them.

Never in my life have I seen a more finely worded tour-de-force in hypocrisy! Well done, Ben!

[Ben Kenobi]

Do I think threadjacking is a serious problem here? Yes.
Do I think Ben and Kid are being treated poorly, including unwarranted personal attacks? Yes.
So, do I think we need to change the rules? No.

Then we're in agreement here, JR. I don't think the rules need to be changed either.

The only downside is that I can't post in very many OT threads

There are currently 35 poly OT threads that I've not posted in. 35/50. You can post in the vast majority of Poly OT threads and never spot a single BK post.

[loinburger]

Because every one of us hates Catholicism, you see.

[giblets]

n.b. -- Ben, if a self-imposed "I don't start political threads" policy is your excuse for jacking off all over any thread that, in your personal opinion and however tangentially, might touch on your current set of religious and/or political beliefs, PLEASE, for the love of all that is good and right in this world, go back to starting political threads.

He won't do this since he knows most people would ignore his political threads.

[-Jrabbit]

I have been trying very hard to avoid engaging Kid and Ben since their returns. And every time I slip in my resolve, almost unfailingly, in his own special way, each demonstrates how right my instinct is. The only downside is that I can't post in very many OT threads. Not a big loss for Poly, I grant you.

Do I think threadjacking is a serious problem here? Yes.
Do I think Ben and Kid are being treated poorly, including unwarranted personal attacks? Yes.
So, do I think we need to change the rules? No.

...the core issue, of people not wanting to read opinions that they disagree with...

This is SO not the core issue.

First, most everyone here knows your opinion on every topic that's important to you. Relentless repetition does that.
Second, it's your intellectual dishonesty and twisting of arguments, not your actual opinions, that no one wants to deal with.
Third, your self-aggrandizing persecution complex grows ever more tiresome. Get off the pity pot.

n.b. -- Ben, if a self-imposed "I don't start political threads" policy is your excuse for jacking off all over any thread that, in your personal opinion and however tangentially, might touch on your current set of religious and/or political beliefs, PLEASE, for the love of all that is good and right in this world, go back to starting political threads.

[/soapbox]

Good luck, Aeson.

[Kidlicious]

This coming from a guy who simply insults people or tells them to shut up. Yeah if rules are going to be enforced, you probably won't like what happens to you

When are you going to stop acting like an amateur?