Suck it, Ben.

[Ben Kenobi]

More prove that you don't care about warning people because that detracts from the shock value.

If we didn't care why would we go out of our way to put up a sign?

You feel the signage is insufficient, not that we didn't put one up at all. That's an issue of personal opinion. We can't please everyone, and no matter what we put up, it will get defaced, etc.

But on the positive side, it's the militant (in your face) side of your crusade that has turned me from pro-life to pro-choice. So hurrah for you. I wonder if you turn more people against you or to you with this type of activities.

My experience is the opposite. I was pro choice, but the vandalism was a real turn-off for me. If you don't like ideas, debate them. Don't try to put bedsheets over the signs.

[Asher]

You didn't put one up at all at the UofC, Ben. You say they did, but they didn't.

People weren't putting bedsheets over the ideas, they were putting them over the decapitated child corpses.

The other pro-life groups with more mature, reasonable signage don't have any of these problems that the radical GAP group does.

[rah]

No, you don't want to debate the issue, you want to shock people. If you wanted an open debate you wouldn't feel the need to post the pictures. The warning sign are only necessary because you don't want to debate.
The only thing you're debating is your right to post the pictures and what's on the warning signs.

What a joke you are.

[Ben Kenobi]

You didn't put one up at all at the UofC, Ben. You say they did, but they didn't.

No, I never said I did.

They did put up warning signs there.

People weren't putting bedsheets over the ideas, they were putting them over the decapitated child corpses.

It's not their decision to make. If people want to see the display, then they ought to be permitted to see the display. I don't care what side you are on.

If there was a pro choice rally, you'd not see me there putting sheets over their signs. It's their right to protest and have their voice heard.

The other pro-life groups with more mature, reasonable signage don't have any of these problems that the radical GAP group does.

That's like blaming the wife for getting beaten by her husband. The immature folks are the counter-protesters who commit vandalism, destroy signs, bring bullhorns and sheets.

There is no reason for any of that. I have no issue with counter protesters, but to be honest, I wish they would extend the same respect and courtesy that we have to them.

[Ben Kenobi]

No, you don't want to debate the issue, you want to shock people.

As I said earlier, GAP is just one part of everything. I believe debates are important too, and the pro choice side for years refused to debate, because as they said "there is nothing to debate, the issue is settled."

If you wanted an open debate you wouldn't feel the need to post the pictures.

False dilemma. Why not do both?

The warning sign are only necessary because you don't want to debate.

How would you get from point A to point B? I've not said anything about holding debates, and yet you assume that GAP is the only thing I support?

The only thing you're debating is your right to post the pictures and what's on the warning signs.

That is the topic of the thread, no? I've said already GAP is a part of things, not the be all and end all.

[Asher]

No, I never said I did.

They did put up warning signs there.

No, they didn't, and you haven't proven they did.

It's not their decision to make. If people want to see the display, then they ought to be permitted to see the display. I don't care what side you are on.

What the **** are you even arguing? The University was more than happy to let them have their display if only the people who wanted to see the display got to see the display. The problem is, your comrades in the GAP thought this was unacceptable.

I wish they would extend the same respect and courtesy that we have to them.

Respect and courtesy does not involve exploiting the holocaust and Rwandan genocide for shock value.

[rah]

Why do i doubt that it was only the vandalism that convinced you to join the abortion doctor killer crowd.

[Thoth]

Instead of banning Ben, can we abort him?

Retroactive abortions.


Asher: Best troll thread in months.

[Nikolai]

I see Asher is still going strong with his wild running bigotry and hate speech. Which is pretty ironic giving his current avatar. And guys, if Poly banned Ben, most of us would have to go. He's far from the worst poster here, behaviourwise. A banning is something you get for breaking posting rules and insulting other posters. So far in this thread, most posters have fullfilled that requirement.

[Dr Strangelove]

Campus Pro-Life and university administrators have been locked in an ongoing dispute over a controversial anti-abortion display called the Genocide Awareness Project, which puts images of dead fetuses next to Holocaust or Rwanda genocide victims.

They put images of dead fetuses next to the victims? Those d**ned Ghouls! Did they go all the way to Poland and Africa, dig up the bodies, and haul the remains back to Canada to make their fiendish displays? No one likes a grave robber. I say lock them up and throw away the key!

[Barnabas]

I would rather call it Human Sacrifice Awareness

Show the picture of a woman getting an abortion, and a painting of some punic woman sacrificing her baby for Baal

[Elok]

I like how Ben supported his point by posting a sign that was quite plainly put up by the campus itself.

[Krill]

I see Asher is still going strong with his wild running bigotry and hate speech. Which is pretty ironic giving his current avatar. And guys, if Poly banned Ben, most of us would have to go. He's far from the worst poster here, behaviourwise. A banning is something you get for breaking posting rules and insulting other posters. So far in this thread, most posters have fullfilled that requirement.

The difference between an insult and the truth is quite important. Ben is a liar, as demonstrated by many threads. Calling him a liar is like calling the Bible unsubstantiated.

[Nikolai]

He's a liar because he has different beliefs and views than most on this forum, and not always can link to some online source? Being factual wrong does not equal being a liar, not being able to prove his claims doesnæt either and having different beliefs/views does certainly not equal it.

[Cort Haus]

Ben's been proved a liar on this thread. Either that or a fool.