Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Which is why we should compensate them based on demand, not on what the government can afford to pay them. Not only is it hard to become a doc, but it's hard to retain one, when they can make more money elsewhere.
Which is why we should compensate them based on demand, not on what the government can afford to pay them. Not only is it hard to become a doc, but it's hard to retain one, when they can make more money elsewhere.
It would reduce frivolous visits.
I'm not asking for pure supply and demand, just that privatisation would be better then the system in Canada. I'm aware that hospitals do need to ensure that everyone is treated, but not every hospital needs to do the same thing. It would be more efficient for the hospitals to specialise.
If they can get in, sure.
No, personally, my grandmother just broke her hip. She's getting treatment in 3 weeks, despite it being an emergency.
In the states she wouldn't wait 3 days. That's a huge difference.
In the states she wouldn't wait 3 days. That's a huge difference.
It's my business. I charge what they are able to pay, no more, no less. If it's not enough for health insurance then I have to take another job or find more clients.
What makes you think that? No, people don't pay an infinite amount to stay healthy. If it costs, they will determine whether they need the surgery now, or put it off.
It's not a zero sum game. If you charge a profit on elective surgeries, you can funnel that profit into the emergency services.
Comment