Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Sonderweg or "special path".
Up until 1945, Germany's entire experience with democracy lasted from 1919 to 1933. That's 14 years of democracy.
Add to that the very recent unification, as compared to Britain and France, and you've got an explosive mixture.
Sonderweg or "special path".
Up until 1945, Germany's entire experience with democracy lasted from 1919 to 1933. That's 14 years of democracy.
Add to that the very recent unification, as compared to Britain and France, and you've got an explosive mixture.
India is prosperous, as a result of the Raj.
Britain improved the infrastructure in India
and brought about a workable system for national unity.
If that were so, we would have seen a rebellion sweep across Africa demanding independence. That was not the case. Instead we saw Britain and France relinquish all of their colonial appanages within the span of 10 years between 1955 and 1965, leading to massive regional upheaval.
India was much more managed. They had reliable and effective leadership in place.
Democracy can be sustained if derived from the desire of the people, but I don't see a significant outcry in the form of rebellion from the people of africa, who for the most part have been betrayed by their leadership.
I see no reason why democracy cannot be successful in Africa, but I don't feel that the sudden independence was helpful to them acquiring the experience necessary for a successful democracy.
Democracy can be sustained if derived from the desire of the people, but I don't see a significant outcry in the form of rebellion from the people of africa, who for the most part have been betrayed by their leadership.
I see no reason why democracy cannot be successful in Africa, but I don't feel that the sudden independence was helpful to them acquiring the experience necessary for a successful democracy.
-Arrian
Comment