Tweet
Women are the ones who would traditionally end up with children. It makes sense that they would be more discriminating about sex.
JM
JM
-
Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment. -
The assumption behind this thread -- that the genders can be generalized, as opposed to treating people as the individuals they are -- is invalid.Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-ArmsComment
-
Same girls for me really. I don't understand why you'd keep two categories. The girls I find attractive are both relationship material and sexy.And let's be honest here. As men, there are women you just want to screw and women you want to have a relationship with. Women who are promiscuous gain the reputation as a "woman you just want to screw". So they have to protect their reputation so that they are seen as relationship material.
Like Nikolai I want to get married first.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!Comment
-
Obviously teher are differenmt attitudes, by why put that on women rather than on received cultural notions? Men and women get their sense of sexuality through the process of socialization; neither develops it in a vacuum or has it genetically encoded. So teh real question is, how does society teach us to behave with regard to sex?
Here's one simple marker: English has a long standing word with positive connotations for a man who has many sexual partners -- "stud." There is no long-standing female equivalent of that term. English also has a long-standing term with negative connotations for a woman who has many sexual partners -- "slut." There is no long-standing male equivalent of that term.
Our ability to understand our own circumstances is greatly constrained by the language in which we must come to that understanding. Constrained by a language in which the same behavior makes men "studs" but women "sluts," what conclusions would you expect men and women to come to about their respective sexualities?"I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George CarlinComment
-
There are male "sluts" and female "players" nowadays as well.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
Match made in heaven...or hell.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Same girls for me really. I don't understand why you'd keep two categories. The girls I find attractive are both relationship material and sexy.
Like Nikolai"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
That's why I said "long-standing." If those new terms ever gain general cultural currency (i.e., are used widely by adults), it'll mark a shift in cultural attitudes. That will be interesting to see.Originally posted by Colonâ„¢
There are male "sluts" and female "players" nowadays as well."I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George CarlinComment
-
QFTOriginally posted by -Jrabbit
The assumption behind this thread -- that the genders can be generalized, as opposed to treating people as the individuals they are -- is invalid.THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
-
So sociology and anthropology -- and for that matter zoology -- are invalid disciplines?Originally posted by -Jrabbit
The assumption behind this thread -- that the genders can be generalized, as opposed to treating people as the individuals they are -- is invalid."I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George CarlinComment
-
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
Ok, just wanted to know what game we're playing...Originally posted by Asher
"I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George CarlinComment
-
Yep. I was right. Guys at Poly are even more clueless about women than they are about everythings else.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Are you married right now Kid?Originally posted by Kidicious
Yep. I was right. Guys at Poly are even more clueless about women than they are about everythings else.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
nopeOriginally posted by Asher
Are you married right now Kid?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Just checking."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
Comment